1. Gate Security System for ArcelorMittal Team 7 Trevor Emerick | Bingyang Wu | Lauren Poole Jazmine Gaymon

2. Overview ▪Background ▪Problem ▪Customer Needs ▪Current System ▪Conceptual Design ▪Proposed Design ▪Risk ▪Budget

3. ArcelorMittal  Largest Steel Producer in the World (Formerly Mittal Steel)  93.6 million tons of Crude Steel (in 2012)  38% of America’s Steel  46% of Europe’s Steel  16% of Other regions Steel  Focus Points  Recycling Most of their product comes from metal that was purchased as scrap and melted down  Safety On and off the job (i.e. texting and driving) End every meeting addressing some sort of safety concern

4. Executive Summary  Problem: The current problem ArcelorMittal has been faced with is the lack of security at the front gate. They currently experience large traffic jams, on the main road, during peak hours of operation.  Solution: Develop a gate security system that provides not only security, but safety for their employees, visitors, contractors and truck drivers. This system will be efficient and provide a way for the safety engineers to verify who is on site if a dangerous situation occurs.

5. Current Traffic Flow Rates  Semi Trucks  Steel Purchasers: 45 trucks (6am - 1pm)  Scrap Drop Offs: 70 trucks (7am - 2:30pm)  Raw Material & Parts Service: 45 trucks (6am - 2pm)  Employees  58 Full Time Salaried Employees (7am - 4pm)  292 Steel Mill Workers (12am-12am) *Average amount of gate traffic per day.

7. Customer Needs  New gate design to replace current aging design  Current design is unsafe and unreliable  Camera to take pictures of employees when entering  Know what the employee looks like in case of emergency  QR Code system for contractors, visitors, truckers  Currently takes 5-10 minutes when these outside employees visit  QR codes can drop this time tremendously.

8. Current System  Very outdated  Truck drivers have to exit trucks to obtain tickets to pick up shipment  Only two guards on duty  One that directs traffic and one that checks in drivers  This can get very hectic, very quick  No database of employees, visitors, contractors or truckers on site in case of emergency

9. Proposed Design Solution

10. Design Ranking  Arduino Yun Microcontroller  Efficient  Easier to create scripts and small apps  Communicates with Web Services through existing APIs  Raspberry Pi Microcontroller  Faster Arm Processor and GPU  In-home entertainment  Cheaper

11. Risk Analysis RiskEventPerformanceCostSchedule HighGives access to unauthorized people Jeopardizing company information and employee safety Potentially highAt least delay of a week MediumMalfunction on the program or motor system Employees’ late to work Limited cost due to loss in working hours Delay of a few hours/ or a few days LowFailures on camera system or small damages on device Fail to capture picture Small due to low device cost Delay for a few days for ordering parts

12. Design Day Budget (Small Scale) ComponentsEstimate Cost Arduino Yun$75.95 Servo Motor$13.99 Logitech HC Webcam C310$32.12 Total:$122.06

13. Questions?