1. Patterns in Evolution I. Phylogenetic II. Morphological III. Historical (later) IV. Biogeographical

2. Patterns in Evolution II. Morphological A. Patterns 1. Homology - similar due to inheritance from immediate ancestor similar in relationship of parts similar in developmental origin similar in genetic regulation

3. Patterns in Evolution II. Morphological A. Patterns 1. Homology - similar due to inheritance from immediate ancestor 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) similar in function

4. convergent evolution: composed of different body parts, or in different arrangement, or different developmental origins (eyes, wings, etc.) Cacti - Western Hemisphere Euphorbs - Eastern Hemisphere

5. 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) convergent evolution: composed of different body parts, or in different arrangement, or different developmental origins (eyes, wings, etc.) Ocotillo - Western HemisphereAllauidia - Eastern Hemisphere

6. 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) convergent evolution: composed of different body parts, or in different arrangement, or different developmental origins (eyes, wings, etc.)

7. 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) convergent evolution: composed of different body parts, or in different arrangement, or different developmental origins (eyes, wings, etc.)

8. 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) parallel evolution: similar (but independent) developmental origin

9. 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) parallel evolution: similar (but independent) developmental origin

10. 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) Batesian Mimicry: toxic model, non-toxic mimic toxic models Female of Papilio dardanus mimicking different species Male of Papilio dardanus

11. 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) Batesian Mimicry: dangerous model, vulnerable mimic

12. 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) Mullerian Mimicry: two toxic species gain an advantage by looking like one another

13. 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) reversals - creates similarities between 'ancestral' and a derived group - often the reversion is due to genetic regulation

14. 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) reversals - creates similarities between 'ancestral' and a derived group - often the reversion is due to genetic regulation

15. 2. Homoplasy - (analogies) reversals - creates similarities between 'ancestral' and a derived group - often the reversion is due to genetic regulation

16. Patterns in Evolution II. Morphological A. Patterns B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns 2. Individualization Evolution by duplication - individualization - specialization - reduction Duplication - Specialization - Reduction.... and individualization at the duplication stage allows for separate evolutionary pressures to act on these replicated parts.

17. B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns 3. Heterochrony evolutionary change due to a change in the timing of developmental events...two classic examples are: Paedomorphosis - either a reduction of development rate, or a shorter absolute development time; either way resulting in the attainment of reproductive adulthood while juvenile characteristics are still present Axolotl

18. B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns 3. Heterochrony evolutionary change due to a change in the timing of developmental events...two classic examples are: Peramorphosis - delayed maturity; reproduction at a disproportionately large size

19. Patterns in Evolution II. Morphological A. Patterns B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns 4. Allometry Differential rates of growth of different body parts. This is a very important mechanism of evolutionary change, because often homologous traits simply differ in the relative size of their parts (bat wing, hand). Often, body size, itself, is used as the standard against which allometric increases in specific body parts are measured... y = bx^a. If a = 1, the body dimensions change at the same rate (no allometry). if a > 1, then y changes faster than x (positive allometry - leg length), and if a < 1, then there is negative allometry. Obviously, allometric differences become more pronounced as the organism increases in size... so large organisms and small often have the most extreme proportions (Irish Elk). Got another example?

20. B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns 4. Allometry

21. Patterns in Evolution II. Morphological A. Patterns B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns 5. Results: Evolutionary Trends Developmental changes can be rather "easy" - these are tweaks to a system. Allometric differences, alone, can occur solely in response to selection for different body sizes. This can produce a very regular and progressive trend in morphology over time, and within a group of closely related organisms. This can occur in an Adaptive Radiation - and these changes in morphology, though slight, may have dramatic changes in the ecology of the organism and may result in niche partitioning among many similar species - like Darwin's Finches, and the Cichlid fishes of lakes in Africa (Malawi, Victoria, Tanganyika). Variant trait can be used for a new purpose…

22. Patterns in Evolution I. Phylogenetic II. Morphological III. Historical (later) IV. Biogeographical

23. Patterns in Evolution IV. Biogeographical A. Darwin's Points 1. The similarity and dissimilarity of faunas can't be completely explained by correlations with environment. For instance, although the faunas of the pampas and Australian grasslands are convergent in response to the similar environment, they are composed of radically different organisms - placentals vs. marsupials.

24. Patterns in Evolution IV. Biogeographical A. Darwin's Points 2. Barriers to migration are critical to maintaining these different communities.

25. Patterns in Evolution IV. Biogeographical A. Darwin's Points 2. Barriers to migration are critical to maintaining these different communities. (Pliocene = 5-1.75 mya) - Great Faunal Exchange

26. Patterns in Evolution IV. Biogeographical A. Darwin's Points 3. Species on a continent are more closely related than those from different continents, on average. Wallace's biogeographical realms

27. Patterns in Evolution IV. Biogeographical A. Darwin's Points B. Alfred Russel Wallace. 1855. On the law that has regulated the introduction of new species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 1. Large groups, such as classes and orders, are generally spread over the whole earth, while smaller ones, such as families and genera, are frequently confined to one portion, often to a very limited district. Class: Aves Family: Trochilidae (Hummingbirds) Archilochus spp. Selasphorus spp.

28. B. Mechanisms 1. Dispersal: both range expansion over contiguous habitat, and 'jump' dispersal across a barrier, or a 'stepping stone' model across an archipelago

29. B. Mechanisms 2. Vicariance: a range is divided by separation of the habitat - tectonic plate separation, new river, etc. A BC

30. C. Patterns 1. Vicariance: phylogeny correlates with the division of land masses (or other geographic or historical patterns) LAND PHYLOGENY

31. C. Patterns 1. Vicariance: monophyletic groups correlate with the division of land masses (or other geographic or historical patterns) Nelsen and Platnick, 1981

32. C. Patterns 1. Vicariance: monophyletic groups correlate with the division of land masses (or other geographic or historical patterns) Nelsen and Platnick, 1981 Vicariance doesn't explain all patterns, but it accounts for the basic pattern.

33. C. Patterns 2. Dispersal: Actually, you can't really falsify dispersal... because some particular dispersal sequence could fit a phylogeny. So, you need to falsify vicariance... and then assume dispersal.

34. C. Patterns 2. Dispersal: Actually, you can't really falsify dispersal... because some particular dispersal sequence could fit a phylogeny. So, you need to falsify vicariance... and then assume dispersal. BUT... dispersal can also correlate with geographical history... in volcanic archipelagoes that "produce" new islands over hotspots... phylogenies that correlate with island age imply dispersal and speciation: Island Age Phylogeny

35. C. Patterns 2. Dispersal: Actually, you can't really falsify dispersal... because some particular dispersal sequence could fit a phylogeny. So, you need to falsify vicariance... and then assume dispersal. BUT... dispersal can also correlate with geographical history... in volcanic archipelagoes that "produce" new islands over hotspots... phylogenies that correlate with island age imply dispersal and speciation. ALSO... unbalanced communities are suggestive of dispersal; the differential dispersal ability of different organisms creates "unbalanced" communities. 1. Marine Archipelagoes lack frogs and large mammals. 2. Islands forms are often giant or dwarf species.