1. Laws in physics have to be accepted
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
Vortex Physics
Laws in physics have to be accepted
19th NPA Conference, Albuquerque Friday July 27, 2012, 2:15 PM, 1h
Vortex Physics and its consequences like:
* basic forces,
* derivation of the gravitational force,
* extended field theory,
* big bang nonsense,
* calculation of all particles and atomic cores

2. The law of “inverse square“ of distance
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: about vortex physics
Spherical Symmetry
The law of “inverse square“ of distance
field source (E or H):
projection screen = x L²
L = distance to the source 2

3. The law of “inverse square“ of distance
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: about vortex physics
Spherical Symmetry
The law of “inverse square“ of distance
field source (E or H):
projection screen = x L² surface of a sphere = 4r²
L = distance to the source r = radius of the sphere
E  1/r²
H  1/r² 3

4. conclusion: about the speed of light
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
conclusion:
about the speed of light
from E, H  1/r and r  c follows:
     the field determines the length measures (what is 1 m) 
     the field determines the velocities v (in m/s) 
     the field determines the speed of light c [m/s] 
     Measurement of the speed of light is made with itself
measured is a constant of measurement c = km/s 
 the speed of light c is not a constant of nature! 4

5. about the Big Bang Theory
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physics
about the Big Bang Theory
the Doppler-effect is based on the addition theorem of velocities
v c - v: c c + v
problem solving 5

6. Big Bang contradicting laws of physics
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physics
Big Bang contradicting laws of physics
fixed stars are without any blue shift?
because the galaxies are contracting slowly
other galaxies outside our galaxy have to show a red shift?
even if they don’t move
the red shift increases with an accelerated contraction (Nobelprize Perlmutter, Schmidt und Riess)
problem solving 6

7. About the light carrying aether
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physics
About the light carrying aether
What determines the speed of light?
If electro-magnetic waves would be bonded to a stationary aether, we should measure the proper motion of earth and sun as a wind of the aether
wind of the aether
earth
sun 7

8. Michelson Interferometer
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: Wirbelphysik
Potsdam 1881
Michelson Interferometer 8

9. field-dependent length contraction
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physics
field-dependent length contraction
statement of the law in physics
field source
scale of length L
E  1/L²
H  1/L² 9

10. Observation of an action of force
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
Observation of an action of force
one body is in the field of another
from follows:
E, H  1/L2
 the distance is getting smaller
 the bodies are attracting each other 10

11. curvature of space E, H  1/r2
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
curvature of space
the earth in the gravitational field of the sun
E, H  1/r2
 Orbital curvature depending on the field
R.J. Boscovich: the earth is respiring unobservable! De spatio et tempore, ut a nobis cognoscuntur, 1755.

12. Ruder Boscovich
1755
E, H  1/r2
R.J. Boscovich: the earth is respiring unobservable. De spatio et tempore, ut a nobis cognoscuntur.

13. interactions, forces Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
Auxiliary terms = formalization of our imagination
Examples for auxiliary terms: (Mass or charge)
·        Gravitational law (central force + centrifugal force)
F = G· ——— ~ ——
(gravitational mass or inertial mass)
·        Coulomb‘s law (force in the electric field)
F = ——— · ——— ~ ——
m1 m
r² r²
Q1 Q
4or r² r² 13

14. Speed reduction in a field
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
Speed reduction in a field
field dependent speed of light
experimental examples about: E, H  1/c2
observer gravitational field star x
·    field-or gravitational lenses
·    Deflection of light (Einstein, at the eclipse 1919) 14

15. curvature of space Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
in the gravitational field of a heavenly body
An experimental example: L[m]  1/E,H with c [m/s] 15

16. Length contraction in a field
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
Length contraction in a field
cause: only electric or magnetic field
More experimental examples: E, H  1/L2
Question: is it always the electromagnetic field?
·     field- or gravitational lenses
·    deflection of light
·    Space curvature
 ·    electrostriction (piezo speaker)
 ·    magnetostriction  16

17. electromagnetic interaction
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
electromagnetic interaction
caused by open field lines
E, H  1/L2
 Example charged mass points (e¯, e+, Ions,...):
As a consequence of open field lines: strong attraction or repulsion 17

18. Derivation of Gravitation
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
Derivation of Gravitation
caused by closed loop field lines
E, H  1/L2
 Example: uncharged Mass points (n°, atoms,...)
As a consequence of closed loop field lines: weak attraction, no repulsion 18

19. From Subjectivity to Objectivity
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
From Subjectivity to Objectivity
physical standpoints
Subjectivity Relativity Objectivity
observal labo- mediator role not observal. ratory physics transformation
Newton Poincaré Boscovich Maxwell Einstein Meyl
Galilei-transf. Lorentz-transf. new transf. for c   c  constant c  variable
the following physical standpoints can be distinguished:
exemplary theories and their representatives:
with the associated transformation: 19

20. Derivation of the standpoints
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
Derivation of the standpoints
two approaches are possible:
approach: r  c  t (determine distance by signal prop. time)
change: dr  cdt + tdc (total differential)
dr  cdt dr  tdc
  r  ct r  tc
  r  t r  c
example: a signal in a distance (r) from the source
case 1: c = constant case 2: t = constant
theory of relativity theory of objectivity 20

21. Relativity versus Objectivity
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
Relativity versus Objectivity
a comparison of the physical standpoints
r  ct r  tc
  r  t r  c
from: length contraction variable speed of light
follows: time dilatation dependence of meter measure
with absolute speed of light with absolute time
many paradoxons without paradoxon
case 1: c  constant case 2: t  constant
theory of relativity theory of objectivity
Observation domain model domain
(measurable) (can only be calculated)
x(r) M{ x (r)} 21

22. Relativity - Objectivity
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory
Relativity - Objectivity
model transformation
Observation domain model domain
(measurable) (only calculable)
x(r) M{ x (r)}
I. approach
II. transform
VI. compare
III. calculate
IV. transform back
V. result 22

23. New Transformation I transformation of the length dependency
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: the unified field theory
New Transformation I
transformation of the length dependency
dependency:
S.of L. c [m/s]  = 1/c²:  [Vs/Am]  [As/Vm]
H [A/m] E [V/m]
B=H [Vs/m²] D=E [As/m²]
SRT (observation)
c = co = constant oo = 1/co² o = constant o = constant
H  1/r² E  1/r²
B  1/r² D  1/r²
AOT (model domain)
c  r   1/r   1/r
H  1/r E  1/r
B  1/r² D  1/r² 23

24. New Transformation II transformation examples
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: the unified field theory
New Transformation II
transformation examples
capacity: charge: energy:
relaxation time: sp. conductivity
SRT (observation)
C [As/V] = 4r Q [As] = CU W [VAs] = Q²/C
1 [s] = /  [A/Vm]
AOT (model domain)
C = constant Q = constant W = constant
1 = constant   1/r
derivation of the law of energy conservation: W = const.
elementary vortices are indestructible:   1/r 24

25. derivations with the theory of objectivity
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: physical particles
derivations with the theory of objectivity
particle mass related to the electron mass
Compari-son of the measured with the calculated particle mass.
measured
calculated
Elementary particle: – 0 – K0 K¯ 0 – n0 0 + ¯ 0 0 ¯ ¯ – F+ 25

26. Principle of causality
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physics
Principle of causality
Vortex as a primary form of causality
cause  effect
Quantum Physical Approach: quanta  fields
Field theoretical Approach: fields  quanta
cause
Principle of causality requires a vortex physics
effect
The vortex term in the science of Demokrit ( BC) was identical with “natural law“ - the first attempt to formulate a unified physics. 26

27. Vortex in Nature Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physics
Ein physikalisches Grundprinzip
Innen: expandierender Wirbel
Außen: kontrahierender Wirbel
Bedingung für Wirbelablösung: gleich mächtige Wirbel
Kriterium: Viskosität
Folge: röhrenförmige Struktur
Beispiele in d. Strömungslehre: Tornado, Windhose, Wasser-, Abflusswirbel
Beispiel E-Technik: Blitz 27

28. another Vortex in Nature
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physics
another Vortex in Nature
Ein physikalisches Grundprinzip
Innen: expandierender Wirbel
Außen: kontrahierender Wirbel
Bedingung für Wirbelablösung: gleich mächtige Wirbel
Kriterium: Viskosität
Folge: röhrenförmige Struktur
Beispiele in d. Strömungslehre: Tornado, Windhose, Wasser-, Abflusswirbel
Beispiel E-Technik: Blitz 28

29. vortex and anti-vortex
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physics
vortex and anti-vortex
a physical basic principle
Inside: expanding vortex
Outside: contracting anti-vortex
Condition for coming off: equally powerful vortices
Criterion: viscosity
Result: tubular structure
Examples in hydrodynamics: tornado, waterspout, whirlwind, drain vortex
Example in electrical engineering: lightning 29

30. Failure of the Maxwell theory
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: Maxwell approximation
Failure of the Maxwell theory
problem of continuity in the case of the coming off of vortices
In conductive materials vortex fields occur, in the insulator however the fields are irrotational.
That is not possible, since at the transition from the conductor to the insulator the laws of refraction are valid and these require continuity!
Hence a failure of the Maxwell theory will occur in the dielectric!
i.e.high-tension cable 30

31. Vortices in Microcosm and Macrocosm
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physics
Vortices in Microcosm and Macrocosm
spherical structures as a result of contracting potential vortices
examples: expanding vortex contracting vortex
quantum collision processes Gluons physics (several quarks) (postulate!)
nuclear repulsion of like strong interaction physics charged particles (postulate!)
atomic centrifugal force of the electrical attraction physics enveloping electrons Schrödinger-equation
Newton‘s centrifugal force gravitation physics (inertia) (can not be derived?!)
astro phys. centrifugal f.(galaxy) dark matter, strings, ... 31

32. Vortex physics seminar
Prof. Dr. Konstantin Meyl
Albuquerque 2012
Thank you for your attention!
Books available including the presentation:
K. Meyl: Scalar Waves (all we know about)
K. Meyl: Self consistent Electrodynamics
(in the shop of )
Prof. Dr. Konstantin MEYL,
Furtwangen University, Germany and 1st Transfer Centre of Scalar wave technology: 32

33. the extended 3rd Maxwell-equation
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: Discovery
the extended 3rd Maxwell-equation
self-consistent electrodynamics
solution 2 (field vortices are forming a scalar wave): - prooved by experiments, -reproducible -international accepted
With the consequences:
1) div B ╪ 0 (offence against the 3rd Maxwell-eq.)
2) Maxwell-equations are only describing a special case (loosing universality).
3) The existence of magnetic monopoles calls for field vortices and scalar waves
4) Vector potential A is obsolete (→ 1)
5) The new vector of potential density b replaces the vector potential A

34. electric monopoles (charge carriers)
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: Discovery
electric monopoles (charge carriers)
consitent with the Maxwell-theory
curl H = j + D/t) (Ampère‘s law)
div curl H = 0 (acc. to the rules of vector analysis)
and: = div j + /t (div D) (eq. of continuity)
div D = el (electric charge density, resp. electric monopoles)
relation: j = – vel = D/1 with 1 time constant of eddy currents (relaxation time) 34

35. magnetic monopoles ? – curl E = b + B/t) (law of induction)
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: discovery
magnetic monopoles ?
extension of the Maxwell-theory
– curl E = b + B/t) (law of induction)
extended by the potential density b [V/m²], Meyl 1990)
– div curl E = 0 and: = div b + /t (div B) (eq. of continuity)
div B = magn (magnetic monopoles?! conflicting the 3rd Maxwell-eq.)
relation: b = – vmagn = B/2 with 2 time constant of the new developed potential vortex 35

36. self-consistent calculation
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: discovery
self-consistent calculation
extended Poynting vektor S
– div S = – div (E x H) = E·rot H – H·rot E
– div S = E·( j + D/t ) + H·( b + B/t )
– div S = ½·/t E·D + ½·/t H·B + E·j + H·b
– — divS dV = —(—·C·U² + —·L·I²) + I²·R1 + —
input = stored power ohmic + dielectric power (electric + magnetic) losses losses
d d U² dt dt R2
Self-consistent electrodynamics, if b replaces A: New! 36

37. Summer Semester 2010 Supervisor at the University of Konstanz
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
Summer Semester 2010
Supervisor at the University of Konstanz
Experimental proof of calculated losses (qualitative comparison) with a MKT capacitor (Siemens-Matsushita) 37

38. vortex structure in HV-capacitor
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: potential vortex
vortex structure in HV-capacitor
visible proof for the existence of potential vortives
Measurement set up (a) and photo of vortex structure in a metallized poly- propylen layer capacitor (at 450 V/ 60 Hz/ 100OC), A. Yializis, S. W. Cichanowski, D. G. Shaw: Electrode Corrosion in Metallized Polypropylene Capacitors, Proceedings of IEEE, International Symposium on Electrical Insulation, Bosten, Mass., June 1980; 38

39. Vortex and anti-vortex
Prof. Dr.-Ing. K. Meyl: potential vortex
Vortex and anti-vortex
The power density shown against fre- quency for noise (a) according to Küpfmüller, as well as for dielectric losses of a capacitor (also a) and for eddy current losses (b) according to Meyl (b in visible duality to a)
Energy of losses