Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lena Guo Jon Heroux Sudhir Nair. Home ownership has always been the American dream There are many factors which affect the demand for housing in the United.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lena Guo Jon Heroux Sudhir Nair. Home ownership has always been the American dream There are many factors which affect the demand for housing in the United."— Presentation transcript:

1 Lena Guo Jon Heroux Sudhir Nair

2 Home ownership has always been the American dream There are many factors which affect the demand for housing in the United States Housing markets have historically gone through boom and bust cycles over the past several decades This study uses annual data for the United States from 1980 to 2011 to find the determinants of home prices

3 To develop an econometric model to determine which market variables explain aggregate demand for housing in the United States. H 0 : Aggregate demand for housing is influenced by various market conditions

4 VariableSource Personal Income US Dept of Commerce - Bureau of Economic Analysis 30-Year Fixed Rate MortgageFreddie Mac Consumer Price Index US Dept of Labor - Bureau of Labor Statistics Dow Jones Industrial AverageFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Housing Price Index for USFederal Housing Finance Agency Median Asking RentUS Dept of Commerce - US Census Bureau Total Housing InventoryUS Dept of Commerce - US Census Bureau US PopulationUS Dept of Commerce - US Census Bureau US Annual GDPMeasuring Worth and US Bureau of Economic Analysis Average Persons per HouseholdUS Census Bureau - America’s Families and Living Arrangements Vacancy Rates (1, 2+ and 5+)US Census Bureau - Housing Vacancies and Homeownership US Annual InflationWorld Bank US Unemployment RateUS Dept of Labor - Bureau of Labor Statistics

5 Software: WinORS™ used to calculate best model: Entered time series data into spreadsheet from 1980 - 2011 Stepwise regression used to remove variables deemed not significant Ordinary least squares used (using Ten Basic steps) to continually eliminate variables based on p-value (>0.05) & VIF (>10) and to test data for autocorrelation, multicollinearity, homoscedasticity, and normality Attempted to force House Price Index and CPI while working through OLS Further tested the model using Zero intercept as well as Multiplicative model to find the best solution

6 ParameterStandardt For Ho:P-Value VariableEstimateErrorEst = 0(95%=0.05)VIF Intercept109443.54987.10221.9450.00001n/a 30-Year Fixed Rate Mortgage -1830.99311.426-5.8790.000022.963 Housing Price Index for United States 86.1511.3697.5780.000012.963 Dependent variable: Total Housing Inventory

7 Average # Persons/Household Consumer Price Index Dow Jones Industrial Average Inflation Rate Median Asking Rent Personal Income US Annual GDP US Population US Unemployment Rate Vacancy Rate Vacancy Rate 1 Unit Vacancy Rate 2+ Units Vacancy Rate 5+ Units

8 Housing Price IndexEndogenous 30 Year Fixed Mortgage RateEndogenous Average # Persons/HouseholdExogenous Consumer Price IndexExogenous Dow Jones AverageExogenous Inflation RateExogenous Median Asking RentEndogenous Personal IncomeExogenous US Annual GDPExogenous US PopulationExogenous US Unemployment RateExogenous Vacancy RateEndogenous Vacancy Rate 1 UnitEndogenous Vacancy Rate 2+ UnitsEndogenous Vacancy Rate 5+ UnitsEndogenous

9 True demand model Q= 109443.465 + 86.15 P -18030.993 FRM Q= total housing inventory P= housing price index FRM= 30-year fixed rate mortgage

10

11 First of 4 assumptions of regression: absence of collinearity – The independent variables are not correlated – Confirmed by variance inflation factor less than 10, ideally less than 5 Removed all variables one-by-one with VIF >10 Average VIF= 2.963

12 Durbin: 1.237 Durbin H: n/c H 0 : Rho=0 – Rho: Pos & Neg Reject – Rho: Pos Do not reject – Rho: Neg Reject Ideal value for Durbin is 2.0 and do not reject H 0 Attempted to remove autocorrelation – First differences – Durbin-adjusted method – Model dissipated in both cases

13 White’s test: 23.835 P-value: 0.00023 reject Determines homoscedascity Ideal value is > 0.05 and do not reject Attempted to correct with weighted OLS file – Did not improve model – Continued with original model

14

15 Correlation for Normality: 0.9708 Approx Critical Value: 0.0720 Ideal is correlation value > critical value Confirmed normal: follows and hugs line

16

17 R-squared: 94.384% – Shows great explanatory power from the independent variables – Measures proportion of variation in dependent variable about its mean explained by variance in independent variables Adjusted R-squared: 93.997% – Remains high and in acceptable range

18 F-value: 243.699 p-value: 0.00001 – Ratio of explained variation:unexplained variation – Result indicates a statistically significant proportion of total variation in dependent variable is explained – P-value is probability of rejecting null hypothesis, confidence level of 99.99%

19 Estimates elasticity of independent variables against the dependent variable A negative value implies an elastic relationship and a positive value implies inelastic relationship 30-Year Fixed Mortgage Rate Housing Price Index for US Average==>-0.149440.16311

20 Tested the model with both linear additive as well as multiplicative model, however results were similar Not able to conclude with this model that the aggregate demand of housing in US is determined by the 15 market variables tested during the time period of 1980-2011 A key observation was the high relationship 30-year fixed mortgage has to the housing inventory – During all the various test runs, 30 year FMR was in the final 2 results – Leads us to the conclusion (despite reject of Rho) that there is an inherent relationship between 30-year FMR and the housing demand – Rate of interest does seem to have an inherent relationship with the aggregate housing demand, compared to other independent variables.

21 30 year FMR has an elastic relationship with the housing inventory levels, while Housing Price Index has a inelastic relationship with the housing inventory levels These results make sense, when the interest rates go down, the housing inventory levels go down, which means the demand has increased Likewise when the Housing Price index goes up, the inventory levels also go up, meaning the housing demand goes down. Note: This was an exploratory study to develop an econometric model to determine which market variables explain aggregate demand for housing in the United States.

22 Professor Gordon Dash’s Lecture Notes and website - http://www.ghdash.net/http://www.ghdash.net/ WinOrs Software and WinOrs Help files. Aggregate demand of Housing in US. http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/DJIA/downloaddata?cid=32255 http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNRATE/downloaddata http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/DJIA/downloaddata?cid=32255 http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNRATE/downloaddata US Annual gdp http://wikiposit.org/w?filter=Economics/MeasuringWorth.com/GDP/ http://wikiposit.org/w?filter=Economics/MeasuringWorth.com/GDP/ US Rate of inflation http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation_Rate/CurrentInflation.asp http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation_Rate/CurrentInflation.asp Consumer Price Index ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt 30 Yr Conventional Mortgage Rate http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/WRMORTG/downloaddata http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/WRMORTG/downloaddata Total Housing Inventory http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0982.pdf http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0982.pdf Modeling the U.S. housing bubble: an econometric analysis by Jonathan Kohn and Sarah K. Bryant http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09381.pdf http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09381.pdf


Download ppt "Lena Guo Jon Heroux Sudhir Nair. Home ownership has always been the American dream There are many factors which affect the demand for housing in the United."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google