Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Model based friction compensation for an electro- mechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Maarten Willem van der Kooij Friday, November 4 th 2011 TexPoint.

Published byGyles Nash Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Model based friction compensation for an electro- mechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Maarten Willem van der Kooij Friday, November 4 th 2011 TexPoint."— Presentation transcript:

1 Model based friction compensation for an electro- mechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Maarten Willem van der Kooij Friday, November 4 th 2011 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.:

2 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Intro – Moog Former Fokker company Located in Nieuw Vennep Employees: Netherlands 160 Worldwide10.000 2

3 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Intro – Stewart Platform 3

4 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Intro – Stewart Platform 4 6 degrees of freedom Electromechanical vs. hydraulic actuators

5 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Intro – Friction 5 Friction opposes the direction of relative velocity

6 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Intro – Current method 6 Simplified model ‘Moog’ compensation

7 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Overview 7 Friction Phenomena Friction Models Friction Model ID Measurement Set-up System Identification FFWD Compensation Adjustments Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions

8 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Theory – Friction Phenomena 8

9 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Lund-Grenoble model Force equation State equation where Theory – Friction Models 9

10 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Theory – Friction Models DNLRX model Presliding model Sliding model 10

11 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Overview 11 Friction Phenomena Friction Models Friction Model ID Measurement Set-up System Identification Theory Identification

12 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Identification – Measurement Set-up 12

13 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Equation of Motion 1.System Identification including simple friction model 2.Identify friction in nonlinear region Identification – System Identification 13

14 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Identification – Friction Model Identification 14

15 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Identification – Check 15

16 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Overview 16 Friction Phenomena Friction Models Friction Model ID Measurement Set-up System Identification FFWD Compensation Adjustments Theory Identification Implementation

17 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Implementation 17 Comparison of three situations Standard test cycle signal Sinusoidal signal 0.2 Hz – 20mm amplitude (‘low acceleration’)

18 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Implementation – Initial Compensation Results 18

19 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Implementation – Model Adjustment LuGre Reduce compensation when leaving presliding DNLRX Reduce number of parameters 19

20 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Implementation – Results 20

21 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Implementation – Results: tracking error 21

22 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Overview 22 Friction Phenomena Friction Models Friction Model ID Measurement Set-up System Identification FFWD Compensation Adjustments Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions

23 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Velocity tracking error reduction by 80% on average for Adjusted DNLRX model Adjusted LuGre model Initial DNLRX model by 69% on average for Initial LuGre model The current is predictable with an absolute average error of 0.1 A Further work is needed on Influence of load Influence of actuator orientation 23

24 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Questions? 24 ?

25 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Appendix Slides 25

26 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions LuGre Adjusted 26

27 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Control of the Actuator / Platform 27

28 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Position Control 28

29 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Derivation of the equation of motion 29

30 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Commanded Velocity Tracking Improvement 30

31 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions 31/… System Model

32 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions System Identification Static Model 32

33 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions DNLRX Dynamic Non Linear Regression with direct application of eXcitation Cost function used in optimization 33

34 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Implementation – ‘Moog’ Algorithm 34 Two tuning methods Manual Automatic

35 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Prediction error 35

36 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions System Identification 36

37 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Validation Data Set 37

38 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Motor Cogging 38

39 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Motor Cogging 39

40 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Acceleration, vel, Tff 40

41 Model based friction compensation for an electromechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Theory Identification Implementation Conclusions Copper losses i^2 * R Iron losses (magnetic losses) Hysteresis losses (magnetization of ferromagnetic materials) Eddy current losses Mechanical losses 41 Losses in the motor

Download ppt "Model based friction compensation for an electro- mechanical actuator of a Stewart platform Maarten Willem van der Kooij Friday, November 4 th 2011 TexPoint."

Similar presentations

ADVANCED MOTION CONTROL First and Second Order Motion by Peter Nachtwey.

ADVANCED MOTION CONTROL First and Second Order Motion by Peter Nachtwey.
ABS Control Project Ondrej Ille Pre-bachelor Project.

ABS Control Project Ondrej Ille Pre-bachelor Project.
ICRA 2005 – Barcelona, 18-21 April 2005Basilio Bona – DAUIN – Politecnico di TorinoPage 1 Identification of Industrial Robot Parameters for Advanced Model-Based.

ICRA 2005 – Barcelona, April 2005Basilio Bona – DAUIN – Politecnico di TorinoPage 1 Identification of Industrial Robot Parameters for Advanced Model-Based.
Pantograph Catenary Interaction Framework for Intelligent Control Amiens, France, December 8 th, 2011 Numerical and Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation of.

Pantograph Catenary Interaction Framework for Intelligent Control Amiens, France, December 8 th, 2011 Numerical and Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation of.
1 Brake-by-Steer Concept 9-5-2015 Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Brake-by-Steer Concept Steer-by-wire application with independently.

1 Brake-by-Steer Concept Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Brake-by-Steer Concept Steer-by-wire application with independently.
Performance oriented anti-windup for a class of neural network controlled systems G. Herrmann M. C. Turner and I. Postlethwaite Control and Instrumentation.

Performance oriented anti-windup for a class of neural network controlled systems G. Herrmann M. C. Turner and I. Postlethwaite Control and Instrumentation.
2E1242 Project Course Automatic Control - The Helicopter.

2E1242 Project Course Automatic Control - The Helicopter.
Mechatronics at the University of Calgary: Concepts and Applications Jeff Pieper.

Mechatronics at the University of Calgary: Concepts and Applications Jeff Pieper.
EGR 105 Foundations of Engineering I

EGR 105 Foundations of Engineering I
Exponential Tracking Control of Hydraulic Proportional Directional Valve and Cylinder via Integrator Backstepping J. Chen†, W. E. Dixon‡, J. R. Wagner†,

Exponential Tracking Control of Hydraulic Proportional Directional Valve and Cylinder via Integrator Backstepping J. Chen†, W. E. Dixon‡, J. R. Wagner†,
System identification of the brake setup in the TU Delft Vehicle Test Lab (VTL) Jean-Paul Busselaar MSc. thesis.

System identification of the brake setup in the TU Delft Vehicle Test Lab (VTL) Jean-Paul Busselaar MSc. thesis.
1 CMPUT 412 Actuation Csaba Szepesvári University of Alberta TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AA A A A.

1 CMPUT 412 Actuation Csaba Szepesvári University of Alberta TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AA A A A.
Active Suspension System Test Platform – Controls Advisor: Mr. Steven Gutschlag Presented: 29 April 2004 Project Member: Jerry L. Campbell Senior Presentation.

Active Suspension System Test Platform – Controls Advisor: Mr. Steven Gutschlag Presented: 29 April 2004 Project Member: Jerry L. Campbell Senior Presentation.
Quantifying Generalization from Trial-by-Trial Behavior in Reaching Movement Dan Liu Natural Computation Group Cognitive Science Department, UCSD March,

Quantifying Generalization from Trial-by-Trial Behavior in Reaching Movement Dan Liu Natural Computation Group Cognitive Science Department, UCSD March,
September 24th 20041/27 Modelling Slip- and Creep-mode Shift Speed Characteristics of a Pushbelt Type CVT Bram Bonsen, Tim Klaassen, Koen van de Meerakker,

September 24th 20041/27 Modelling Slip- and Creep-mode Shift Speed Characteristics of a Pushbelt Type CVT Bram Bonsen, Tim Klaassen, Koen van de Meerakker,
Introduction: Eccentricity and Cogging. Motor Model.

Introduction: Eccentricity and Cogging. Motor Model.
Harvard - Boston University - University of Maryland Magnetostrictive Models R. Venkataraman, P. S. Krishnaprasad Low dimensional models Presentation to.

Harvard - Boston University - University of Maryland Magnetostrictive Models R. Venkataraman, P. S. Krishnaprasad Low dimensional models Presentation to.
Modeling and Characterization of a Linear PiezoMotor Mustafa Arafa, Osama Aldraihem*, Amr Baz 5 th International Symposium on Mechatronics and its Applications.

Modeling and Characterization of a Linear PiezoMotor Mustafa Arafa, Osama Aldraihem*, Amr Baz 5 th International Symposium on Mechatronics and its Applications.
D D L ynamic aboratory esign 5-Nov-04Group Meeting Accelerometer Based Handwheel State Estimation For Force Feedback in Steer-By-Wire Vehicles Joshua P.

D D L ynamic aboratory esign 5-Nov-04Group Meeting Accelerometer Based Handwheel State Estimation For Force Feedback in Steer-By-Wire Vehicles Joshua P.
Adaptive Signal Processing Class Project Adaptive Interacting Multiple Model Technique for Tracking Maneuvering Targets Viji Paul, Sahay Shishir Brijendra,

Adaptive Signal Processing Class Project Adaptive Interacting Multiple Model Technique for Tracking Maneuvering Targets Viji Paul, Sahay Shishir Brijendra,

Similar presentations

Ads by Google