1. IPPIC 5 years anniversary at the IMO IPPIC 4th Global Marine Coatings Forum Singapore 6-8 November 2012 Ole Borring Sørensen Hempel A/S On behalf of IPPIC PSPC and Anti-fouling Working Groups

2. November 2007: IMO granted consultative status to IPPIC November 2012: 4 th Global Marine Coatings Forum 5 years anniversary

3. IPPIC – a global organization The IPPIC network Anno 2012

4. How IPPIC can contribute to IMO Examples taken from IPPIC’s 2007 application: IPPIC can provide global expertise on marine coatings formulation:IPPIC can provide global expertise on marine coatings formulation: Independent from the chemical industryIndependent from the chemical industry Unique knowledge on R&D and application of marine coatingsUnique knowledge on R&D and application of marine coatings Members made major investments in R&D for marine productsMembers made major investments in R&D for marine products Members are the primary resource for information on the development and use of ingredients:Members are the primary resource for information on the development and use of ingredients: Environmental considerations relating to the use of anti- fouling systemsEnvironmental considerations relating to the use of anti- fouling systems Support of the on-going IMO activity on the AFS ConventionSupport of the on-going IMO activity on the AFS Convention Continued on next slide

5. How IPPIC can contribute to IMO Examples taken from IPPIC’s 2007 application: IPPIC members possess a wealth of experience in:IPPIC members possess a wealth of experience in: Technical issuesTechnical issues Environmental issuesEnvironmental issues Safety issues associated with protective coatings.Safety issues associated with protective coatings. This expertise is extremely valuable to MSC on performance standards for marine coatings.This expertise is extremely valuable to MSC on performance standards for marine coatings. IPPIC’s network of dangerous goods transport experts can provide IMO with resources on Specialized Product ShipmentsIPPIC’s network of dangerous goods transport experts can provide IMO with resources on Specialized Product Shipments

6. Anti-fouling activities prior to 2007 19961997199819992000200120022003 Various correspondence and working groups CEPE & JPMA: IMO discussions on the effect of AF use AFS Convention AFS implementation

7. PSPC activities prior to 2007 20022003200420052006200720082009 Correspondence group IACS JWG PSPC First CEPE representation IMO recognition PSPC WG

8. WG activities until today 20062007200820092010201120122014 Correspondence groups: Void spaces, PMA and COT IACS JWG/COT IMO recognition AF WGPSPC WG IPPIC JWG Ballast water management

9. Was there a need for a PSPC WG? Yes, because: We were involved too late in the PSPC processWe were involved too late in the PSPC process The co-operation within the industry was not fully utilizedThe co-operation within the industry was not fully utilized We have been few actors in IMO delegations and in working groupsWe have been few actors in IMO delegations and in working groups No agreed mandateNo agreed mandate We looked for: More networking – also with other interest groups within the IMO work Thoroughly discussed policies to the benefit of everybody More shoulders to bear the workload.

10. IPPIC activities in IMO IPPIC has submitted 15 documents since 2007 – alone or together with other organizations

11. IPPIC submissions Paper symbolSub-Title DE 51/19/3 Draft Performance Standard for protective coating for cargo oil tanks of crude oil tankers DE 52/14/1 Report of Industry JWG/COTCPS Development of Cargo Oil Tank Coating Performance Standard MEPC 60/13 The generation of biocide leaching rate estimates for anti-fouling coatings and their use in the development of proposals to amend annex 1 of the AFS Convention MEPC 60/4/21 The importance of using effective anti-fouling coatings in relation to greenhouse gas emissions from shipping MSC 87/INF.9Information on coating test development MSC 87/7/2Comments on the report of the DE Sub-Committee MSC 87/3/8 Proposed entry into force dates for new SOLAS regulation II-1/3-11 on Corrosion protection of cargo oil tanks of crude oil tankers

12. IPPIC submissions Paper symbolSub-Title MEPC 61/14 Survey and certification under the AFS Convention – recognized organizations' type-approval schemes for anti-fouling paints DSC 16/3/5 Amendment (36-12) to the IMDG Code and supplements Revision of provisions for allocation of segregation groups to mixtures, solutions or preparations shipped under N.O.S. entries DSC 16/3/11Documentation of technical names for marine pollutants DSC 16/3/12Documentation of aquatic and marine pollutants MEPC 63/INF.9Information on coating test development DSC 17/3/1Documentation of Marine Pollutants DSC 17/3/2PP1 loads on roll-on/roll-off ships MEPC 64/INF.21 Considerations regarding testing to ensure compatibility between Ballast Water Management Systems and ballast tank coatings

13. IPPIC finger prints on IMO documents Standard/guidelineAdoptedEnter into force MSC.215(82) PSPC for Dedicated Seawater Ballast Tanks in All Types of Ships and Double-skin Spaces of Bulk Carrier December 2006 1 July 2008 MSC.244(83) PSPC for void spaces on bulk carriers and oil tankers October 2007 Non-mandatory MSC.1/Circ.1279 Guidelines for corrosion protection of permanent means of access arrangements May 2008 Guidelines MSC.1/Circ.1330 Guidelines for Maintenance and Repair of Protective Coatings May-June 2009 Guidelines Invited to apply on or after 1 January 2011 MSC.1/Circ.1381. revised NACE standard SP0508-2010 as part of modified footnotes in MSC,215(82) and MSC.288(87) December 2010 MSC.288(87) PSPC for Cargo Oil Tanks of Crude Oil Tankers May 2010 Mandatory 1 January 2013 MSC.1/Circ.1399 Guidelines on procedures for in-service maintenance and repair of coating systems for cargo oil tanks of crude oil tankers June 2011 MEPC.207(62) Guidelines for the control and management of ships’ biofouling to minimise the transfer of invasive aquatic species July 2011Voluntary

14. Joint Research Projects Comparison of The Effect of Hypochlorite Solutions on Different Ballast Water Tank Coatings, September 2012 Comparison of The Effect of Hypochlorite Solutions on Different Ballast Water Tank Coatings, September 2012 Comparison of test methods on coatings for water ballast treatment systems using chlorine and proposal for test methodology, TÜV Rheinland Nederland, September 2012 Comparison of test methods on coatings for water ballast treatment systems using chlorine and proposal for test methodology, TÜV Rheinland Nederland, September 2012 DE 53, Agenda item 7, Cargo Oil Tank Coating and Corrosion Protection – Information on coating test development. Presentation given during IMO DE 53 meeting, 22 February 2010 DE 53, Agenda item 7, Cargo Oil Tank Coating and Corrosion Protection – Information on coating test development. Presentation given during IMO DE 53 meeting, 22 February 2010 Assessment of the influence of the different constituents in artificial crude oil mixtures (6 months), July 2010 Assessment of the influence of the different constituents in artificial crude oil mixtures (6 months), July 2010

15. PSPC WG members 2012 Chugoku Chugoku Hempel Hempel International Paint International Paint Jotun Jotun Kansai Paint Kansai Paint Nippon Paint Nippon Paint Sherwin-Williams Sherwin-Williams Sigma Coatings (PPG) Sigma Coatings (PPG) Technically highly skilled professionals having the knowledge, experience and motivation to participate in the activities of the groups Working group members

16. AFWG members 2012 Formulators Chugoku Chugoku Hempel Hempel International Paint International Paint Jotun Jotun Kansai Paint Kansai Paint Nippon Paint Nippon Paint Sherwin-Williams Sherwin-Williams Sigma Coatings (PPG) Sigma Coatings (PPG)Suppliers: American Chemet, Bardyke, Dow, Janssen, Lanxess, Lonza, Nordox, Speiss-Urania American Chemet, Bardyke, Dow, Janssen, Lanxess, Lonza, Nordox, Speiss-Urania Working group members

17. Conclusions What have the working groups achieved? Recognized in IMO as the coatings industry’s true representativeRecognized in IMO as the coatings industry’s true representative Contributed to IMO correspondence-, working- and drafting groupsContributed to IMO correspondence-, working- and drafting groups Contributed to the interpretation of performance standards for coatingsContributed to the interpretation of performance standards for coatings Contributed to Guidelines for the Control and Management of Ships’ BiofoulingContributed to Guidelines for the Control and Management of Ships’ Biofouling Continued on next slide

18. Conclusions Contributed to maintenance and repair guidelines for ballast tanks and cargo oil tanksContributed to maintenance and repair guidelines for ballast tanks and cargo oil tanks Obtained acceptance for technically more relevant test standards for void space coatingsObtained acceptance for technically more relevant test standards for void space coatings Obtained an extended implementation period for PSPC/COT allowing more time for developing and testing complying coatingsObtained an extended implementation period for PSPC/COT allowing more time for developing and testing complying coatings Established co-operation between GESAMP and NACE as regards corrosion tests for Ballast Water Management systemsEstablished co-operation between GESAMP and NACE as regards corrosion tests for Ballast Water Management systems

19. 5 years anniversary Thank you to those that have supported us. Congratulations to the IPPIC organization and those companies and individuals dedicated to the work within IMO

20. Paint – Recognised through ages Specification for Noah’s Ark: Coating: Pitch inside and outCoating: Pitch inside and out LOA: 140 meterLOA: 140 meter Breadth moulded: ~23 meterBreadth moulded: ~23 meter Draught: ~10 meterDraught: ~10 meter GT: ~15,000 tonnesGT: ~15,000 tonnes Pitch is black, and ballast tank coatings must be of a light colourPitch is black, and ballast tank coatings must be of a light colour Pitch is not a hard coating such as epoxyPitch is not a hard coating such as epoxy No specification for number of coats or thickness of the coatingNo specification for number of coats or thickness of the coating Finally, there was nobody there to type approve the pitch and its manufacturer.Finally, there was nobody there to type approve the pitch and its manufacturer. So Noah’s Ark does not meet IMO Res. MSC.215(82)