1. Marine Corps Task List MCTL / MET / METL Life Cycle Jul 2015
Maryroi Goldman, CIV
MCTL Branch Head
HQMC, CD&I, CDD, MAGTF Integration Division
Office of Strategic Management
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

2. Overview MCTL/MET/METL Readiness Life Cycle
MCTL Task Organization, Structure and Mission Statement Connection
How are METs used in Training?
MCTIMS Policy and Web Access
How are METs used in Resourcing Analysis?
How are METs used in Readiness Reporting?
What is the process for MET/METL Development?
Once a MCT becomes a MET, what is required when drafting measures?
Process to recommend NEW/existing MCT as a MET within a COI METL
MCTL/METL Life Cycle support s CD&I future capability development and acquisition/procurement analysis?
CD&I MCTL Website and MCTL Branch Contact Info
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

3. MCT / MET / METL Readiness Life Cycle
FOUO // SEE DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
MCT / MET / METL Readiness Life Cycle
(CURRENT Capabilities)
Core, OPLAN,
Assigned Mission or
(FUTURE Capabilities)
Expeditionary Force 21 MC Service Campaign Plan
“CAPABILITY”
MCTL “Tasks” = METs/METLs
TFSMS (T/O&E) MCTIMS (Training)
Authoritative Data Source (ADS) System Interfacing METs/METLs
Manpower, Equipment,
Trained Performance
Standards and Metrics
USMC READINESS
DRRS-MC
MISSION PERFORMANCE MISSION ASSESSMENTS
“Force in Readiness”
Provides MCSHA Analytics
USMC MISSION
(Current-to-Future
Future-to-Current
Cycle)
REQUIREMENTS
CAPABILITIES
STRUCTURE/RESOURCES
RFFs / FORCE SOURCING THE ESTABLISHED USMC CURRENT CAPABILITIES
MCT / MET / METL Life Cycle is the organizational relationship between Mission Planning, Requirements, Capabilities, Resources, Capabilities Sourcing and Readiness performance indicators reported in DRRS-MC
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED
FOUO // SEE DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

4. MCTL Supports Current Capability MET/METL Development
MCTL is a “Dictionary” of current USMC activities or actions defined as “Tasks” that an organization must perform to accomplish a mission.
MCT’s are used by COI/SE as “Building Blocks” for METs/METLs
USMC TASKS:
MCT Conduct Amphibious OPS
MCT Conduct Offensive OPS
MCT Conduct Defensive OPS
MCT Conduct Irregular Warfare (IW)
MCT Conduct NEO
MCT Conduct Stability OPS
MCT Support COIN OPS
MCT Facilitate Foreign HA
Official Tri-Service Directive
OPNAVINST
MCO
USCG COMDTINST
EX: INFANTRY CORE METL
EX: INFANTRY CORE METs:
1. MCT Conduct Amphibious OPS
2. MCT Conduct Offensive OPS
3. MCT Conduct Defensive OPS
MCT Conduct Stability OPS
MCT Support COIN OPS**
**Not deemed CORE by Community but could be used in an Assigned Mission/OPLAN METL
TASK (MET)
TASK (MET) 1 2
TASK (MET)
TASK (MET)
TASK (MET) 3 4 5
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

5. MCTL Task Organization
Standardized “Dictionary/Library” of common language “Tasks” an
organization must perform to accomplish mission capabilities
Maneuver
Intelligence
Fires
Logistics
Command and Control
Force Protection
Contains Task Title, Task Definition, Doctrinal References and Suggested Measures
EXAMPLE Marine Corps Task
Task Title: MCT Conduct Amphibious Operations
Definition: To conduct a military operation launched from the sea by an amphibious force, embarked in ships or craft with the primary purpose of introducing a landing force ashore to accomplish the assigned mission. Types of amphibious operations include assaults, withdrawals, demonstrations, raids, and other amphibious operations in a permissive, uncertain, or hostile environment.
Doctrinal References: (JP 1-02, 3-02, MCDP 1-0, 3, MCWP , , MCRP A, MCO )
Suggested/EXAMPLE Measures:
M1 Percent Of qualified and deployable MOS Marines available to conduct Amphibious Operations.
M2 Percent Of Mission Essential Equipment (MEE) supply on hand and Mission Ready.
M3 Y/N Able to conduct amphibious operations at MEB level, transitioning MAGTF capabilities ashore
from amphibious shipping.
M4 Y/N Regimental HQ capable of executing C2 throughout all phases of the amphibious operation.
Designed Capabilities of a USMC Unit or
Functional Support Capabilities of an Installation / Base / Station
Organized by the Six Warfighting Functions
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED 5

6. EX: CA / CMO Marine Corps Tasks
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

7. EX: TFSMS CA / CMO Support Structure and Mission Statement
COI Mission Statement should align with COI METs/METLs
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

8. How are METs used in Training?
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

9. Unit METs/METLs Unit METL DRRS-MC Readiness Standards
MCTL serves as the common reference for USMC commanders, staffs, and trainers. Units serving in their Core and Assigned Missions derive their “tasks” from MCTL and are required to reporting their operational readiness to execute these tasks in DRRS-MC.
A MCT that is considered “essential” or “critical” to mission accomplishment becomes a Mission Essential Task (MET).
METs are externally focused and are tasks for which the unit was designed, organized, or sourced to the mission or OPLAN.
METs answer the question “Why does this unit exist?” METs are focused outside the command, support another command, or directly affect the enemy.
Standards: Personnel, Equipment, Training and Certification requirements, Output measures.
Core Tasks define the design capabilities for a type of unit, are published in the MCTIMS Task Master ADS database, and are used to develop the type community’s T&R Manual.
Assigned Mission Tasks/OPLAN Tasks are developed when a unit prepares to participate in a specific unit deployment, operation, or alert mission (e.g., MEU BN Landing Team, Global Response Force) and may/may not be “additive” tasks to the established Core METL.
DRRS-MC
Unit METL
Core Mission
Assigned Mission
MET
MCT
MET
MCT
MET
MCT
MET
MCT
Readiness Standards
Personnel
Equipment
Outputs
Subordinate Units
Certification
Supporting Units
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

10. Marine Corps Training & Information Management System (MCTIMS)
HQMC CD&I / MCCDC TECOM’s Database with 14 Separate, Stand-alone User Modules:
Task Master provides the Authoritative Data Source (ADS) for MCTL MCTs
and all USMC current unit, installation/base/station organizational METs/METLs
with performance training standards aligned to other MCTIMS Modules
Maintained by CD&I/CDD/MID MCTL Branch and MARFORCOM G3
MARFORCOM Exports/Interfaces MET/METL data to DRRS-MC weekly
To obtain a Task Master Account, contact MCTIMS Helpdesk:
CAC Card, First/Last name, and Phone number
MCTIMS Help Desk DSN: / Commercial:
MOS Roadmap
MOS Manual
Student Registrar
Curriculum Management
Scheduling Management
Student Management
Student Evaluation
Task Master
Training & Readiness Manual
Unit Training & Individual Marine Mgmt.
Electronic Training Jacket
Training Resources
Pre-Deployment
Report Server
HQMC CD&I / MCCDC TECOM
MCO
MCTIMS SOP 2014
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

11. MCO 3500.110 METL Development, (2011)
MCTIMS Task Master
MY MODULES TM
TASK MASTER
CD&I
MCO METL Development, (2011)
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

12. MCTIMS Task Master Task Sets, METs, Standards, T&R
Infantry T&R Manual (NAVMC )
E-Coded events for :
MCT Conduct Offensive OPS
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

13. How are METs used in Resourcing Analysis?
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

14. MET Aligned to Training Requirements, MET Aligned to T/E-to-TAMCN-to-MCPC
Equipment /System modernization/ sustainment/ exiting data can be linked to a Unit’s current T/E MEE/PEI in their readiness reportable METL.
MCSHA analytics objective is to illustrate how Program $$ were executed in a given Year which provides leadership visibility of potential risks associated to T/E MEE/PEI and a unit’s ability to conduct mission capabilities.
UNIT METL
Individual MET aligned to T&R TRAINING EVENTS
UNIT METL
Individual MET aligned to Unit T/E w/TAMCN
MCTs-to-METs-to-METLs reported in DRRS-MC illustrates a MCT defined “Capability” w/associated T/E TAMCNs-to-MCPCs/CACs (Program $$)
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

15. MET Measure Alignment to MCPCs
Illustrates Funding Stream/Program $$ associated to provided Capability
MCT 6.0 Protect the Force (used in Installation METL) M1
Y/N
An effective and comprehensive CBRN Protection Program has been implemented. M2
An effective and comprehensive Antiterrorism Program has been implemented. M3
An effective and comprehensive Physical Security Program has been implemented. M4
An effective and comprehensive Critical Infrastructure Protection Program has been implemented. M5
An effective and comprehensive Emergency Management Program has been implemented. M6
An effective and comprehensive Continuity of Operations Plan has been implemented. M7
An effective and comprehensive Fire and Emergency Services Program has been implemented. M8
An effective and comprehensive Installation Law Enforcement Program has been implemented. M9
An effective and comprehensive expeditionary law and order operations program has been implemented.
M10
An effective and comprehensive Consequence Management Plan has been implemented.
M11
An effective and comprehensive Pandemic Influenza/Contagious Disease Containment Program has been implemented.
M12
An effective and comprehensive Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) program has been established.
M13
Security capabilities supporting maneuver of forces available.
M14
Number
Of casualties due to non-combat operations (includes all hazards incidents [natural causes, dxwx], fratricide and accidents, insider threat).
M15
Plan, implement, and sustain force protection/security measures against enemy actions.
M16
Time
After initial warning of attack/event and within 10 minutes, to warn supported organizations/friendly forces (e.g. CBRN, SSM, Enemy Aircraft, and indirect/direct fire).
M17
After attack/event to recover operational capability.
M18
Are Base Operating Support (BOS) Lines of Operations (LOO) rated at Common Output Levels of Service (COLS) 2 or better?
M19
Operations Centers/ EOCs are able to effectively and responsively plan, coordinate, communicate and execute capabilities in support of local, regional, or national crises.
M20
Facility Condition Index (FCI) rating of Q2 or better for associated security services facilities.
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

16. How are METs used in Readiness Reporting?
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

17. Marine Corps Task Linkages
“Tasks”/METs are linked Top Down / Bottom Up ISO HHQ and Reported in DRRS-MC
Reported in DRRS-S
DoD / JS / OSD / Chairman’s Readiness System
JMETL
Supported COCOM/CCDR
USMC METL
MARFOR
SN Provide Forces – OPLANs/CONPLANs
MEF/MEU/MEB
MCT Provide Task Organized Forces
Marine Division
MCT Conduct Defensive Ops
Infantry Regt HQ
MCT Plan and Direct Defensive Ops
Infantry BN
(SPMAGTF)
MCT Conduct Defensive Ops
MCT Support Maneuver Through the Provision of Training Ranges (Tactical Training Support,
Ranges/Areas, Facilities, Devices)
MCT Community Services
MCT Conduct Supply Operations
MCT Conduct Transportation Operations
MCT Provide Services (Nonmaterial & Support Activities)
MCT Provide Airfield Operation Services
MCT Provide Base and Station Facilities and Related Infrastructure
MCT Protect the Force
MCICOM
--MCIEast (II MEF)
--MCIWest (I MEF)
--MCIPac (III MEF)
Installations / Bases / Stations providing Support & Programs to the Warfighters and their Families
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

18. DRRS-Enterprise & ADS Interfaces
DoD / JS / OSD / Chairman’s Readiness System
JOPES / JCCA / GCSS
Joint Operational Planning/Execution System
Joint Combat Capability Assessment
Global Combat Support System
BIDE / GSORTS / ESORTS / GDSS
Service Unit Status Reports/Basic ID Data Elements
Global Status of Resources and Training System
Enhanced Global Status of Resources and Training System
Global Decision Support System
JWICS / DCIIN / MARMS
Joint Worldwide Intel Communications System
Joint Defense Continuity & Integrated Intel Network
Joint Mission Assurance Risk Management System
MC-CAMS / MARMS
USMC Installation Preparedness
Possible FUTURE Interface
DRRS-MC
SIPR-CLASSIFIED
ADS DOMAIN TRANSFER
(Org Structure
T/O & T/E)
AMSRR
(Aviation)
MCTFS
(Personnel)
NIPR
NALCOMIS
(Aviation)
SERMIS
(Aviation)
MFC Force Provider METL Data / RFF EXPORT
MDR / MERIT
(Equipment)
Facilities Condition
Index
(MILCON)
MCTL and METs/METLs
reside UNCLASS
in MCTIMS Task Master Module
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

19. Why does ACCURATE DRRS-MC Reporting matter ?
GRAND OPENING
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

20. What is the process for MET/METL Development?
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

21. MCTL / METL Life Cycle Process MCO
HQMC CD&I
MCO METL Development, Review, Approval, Publication and Maintenance
(15 Jul 2011)
CD&I’s MCO , Codifies and Validates:
Process owners, roles and responsibilities
Synchronization and integration of MCT/MET/METL development with:
TECOM (COI T&R Manual Alignment, 3 Yr. cycle)
MARFORCOM (USMC Force Provider)
Advocates (Approval Authority)
Provides common methodology for the conduct of MCT/MET/METL Review and Development “Workshops”
Identifies the “central repository” for MET/METL data (MCTIMS/Taskmaster Module DB)
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

22. MET / METL Process Start Finish SUPPLIERS INPUTS PROCESS OUTPUTS
CUSTOMERS
Units
Installations
Unit w/Designed Capability
Mission Statement
SE and Installation Support to the Warfighter
MCTL Task/s
USMC or Joint Doctrine
Conditions
T/O (MOS) & T/E (MEE/PEI)
Training Events (E-Coded Individual/Collective) Exercises and Certifications aligned to COI T&R Manuals
DoDI – Installation Benchmark and/or Title X Requirements
Process Flowchart Below
Policy Controls:
DoD DRRS Enterprise Policies
MCO (MCTL)
MCO DRRS-MC
MCO (METL)
MCO (MCTIMS)
METL Development
Workshops
Adjudication/Advocates
Incorporation into
MCTL / MCTIMS /
DRRS-MC
List of “Mission Essential” MCTs
Standards/Criteria
Metrics:
- P = Personnel
- E = Equipment
- T = Training
- O = Output
Commanders
MARFORs/MEFs/
MEUs/MEBs/Units
Install/Bases
Advocates
CD&I Integration Divisions – Force Development and WIPEB Strategies
HQMC / PP&O
MROC / JROC
CONGRESS
SECDEF / POTUS
Prioritize Tasks as Essential/Critical to Mission Success
Determine T/O & T/E Required that Affect Task Performance
Start
Core Design Capability
Develop List of Unit or Installation Capabilities/Tasks
Determine Task Output Criteria: Y/N, Time, etc. to conduct Task for Mission Success
Determine Standards for Each Task
Identify Conditions that Affect Task Performance
Finish
Identify Training Events that Affect Task Performance
UNCLASSIFIED
Jul 2015 22

23. MET / METL Types METL “Workshop” Goals
Core Mission Essential Tasks
Critical, discrete, externally-focused activities that enable execution of the organizational mission; tasks for which standing organizations were designed; standardized for each unit type
Core Plus Mission Essential Tasks
Have lower probability of execution; theater specific; NOT included in unit readiness assessments; Units may elect to include Core Plus tasks in their METLs and associated training plans
Assigned Mission Essential Tasks
Assessed when 25 percent or more of a unit deploys or prepares to deploy in support of a Named Operation; Based on Core METs, Core Plus METs, Mission templates, and deployment guidance
Select MCTs as METs and Develop COI METL = 20% of the WG’s time
Select Conditions = <10% of the WG’s time
Establish Standards = >70% of the WG’s time
An accurate accounting of mission “critical” tasks your organization does for the fight
Broad brush canvas of the environment you expect to do the task in
Relevant, measurable metrics shaping the evaluation of COI readiness to execute a critical task or unit mission
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

24. Once an MCT becomes a MET, what is required when drafting measures?
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

25. MET Standard Types Resource Standards:
Manpower (T/O) and Equipment (T/E) required to produce the outputs
Training/Certification Standards:
Training required to produce the outputs
Links DRRS-MC assessment to COI T&R Manual standards
Links “E” coded events to the MET; identifies Exercises/Certs required
Output (Performance) Standards:
Quantify the outputs provided to the gaining Force Commander
Focus on results rather than process, inputs, or resources applied
Subordinate/Supporting Unit Standards:
Tasks performed by other units that are required to produce the outputs
Required for intermediate level commands
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

26. MET Personnel (T/O) & MET Equipment (T/E) Standards
Measure the Personnel required to produce the required task outputs under the selected task conditions; Link Personnel on the unit (T/O) to the tasks they support; Personnel metrics are used in DRRS-MC to assess the resources required to accomplish the task
Personnel Examples:
>= 16 crews formed
>= 80% Of T/O billets filled with MOS-qualified, deployable personnel
>= 80% of MOS 0621 T/O filled with MOS-qualified, deployable personnel
>= 2 MOS 0602 billets filled with MOS-qualified, deployable personnel
Measure the Equipment required to produce the required task outputs under the selected task conditions; Link Equipment on the unit Table of Equipment (T/E) to the tasks they support; Equipment metrics are used in DRRS-MC to assess the resources required to accomplish the task
Equipment Examples:
>= 80% of BN T/E Stinger sub-systems mission ready and available
>= 2 DTC (or equivalent stand-alone equipment) ready and available
>= 80% of single channel radios T/E ready and available
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

27. MET Training & MET Output Standards
Measure the Training required to produce the required task outputs under the selected task conditions; Training metrics are used in DRRS-MC to:
Assess the training required for the task
Support the calculation of the percentage of METs trained
Normally refer to E-coded events in an approved COI T&R Manual, or Collective events
identified by the community as critical indicators of a unit’s ability to perform a MET
Training Example:
>=4 teams trained to standard in 0321-AMPH-4002 Conduct a clandestine amphibious landing/withdrawal
Measure the capability to produce the required Output or endstate. Quantify and scope the activity described by the task; Output metrics are used in DRRS-MC to assess the observation of the task performance.
Output Examples:
>= 22,400 gallons per day of bulk fuel received/stored/dispensed
>= 2 site(s) established to provide immediate humanitarian assistance, including food, water,
and health services
Y/N Capable of boarding high freeboard ship
Y/N Capable of applying combat power to delay, impede, halt, or dislodge the enemy
Y/N Capable of seizing multiple battalion objectives through surface and/or heliborne assault
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

28. Process to recommend NEW/Existing MCT as a MET within a COI METL
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

29. NEW/Revised MCTs/METs Require COI Review, Advocate/OAG Approval
DISCONNECTS
CONSIDERATIONS
COI requires change/modification to existing MCTs used as a MET within their DRRS-MC reportable METL, due to structure changes, resource or training deficiencies.
COI may conduct an internal “Capabilities Based Assessment” (CBA) or a T&R Manual review to assess organizational capabilities and identify resource or training deficiencies, but the MET/METL Review and Development Workshop should be conducted as a precursor to those efforts.
COI independent CBA and T&R Manual reviews outside of the established MET/METL process necessitates corrective understanding, and often, repeatable work.
COI’s CBA analysis identifying desired future capability is useful for CD&I/CDD’s MCCL, MGL and solution documents, but NOT acceptable for deliverables required to reflect current capabilities and readiness reporting in DRRS-MC.
Mission criteria based on future T/O&E prevents development of an adequate Training plan resulting in artificially skewing COI’s combat capability assessment and creating degraded readiness within DRRS-MC .
MCT/MET change recommendations vetted within the COI, reviewed by Advocate, WITHOUT collaborative coordination and staffing with CD&I, TECOM and MARFORCOM codified within the MET/METL Review/Development MCO results in communication disconnects and readiness data misalignments.
PROCESS CONTROL
ENDSTATE
CD&I, along with TECOM and MARFORCOM, conduct COI MET/METL reviews PRIOR to T&R Manual reviews.
MET/METL review process is “lock-step” with COI T&R Manual reviews conducted every three (3) years.
CD&I requires, during MET/METL review workshops, the COI’s validation of current readiness reportable capabilities, accuracy of stated Mission Statement, quantifiable measurable metrics, output standards and trained proficiencies aligned to the COI T&R Manual.
CD&I requires Advocate/OAG approval to recommended new/revised MCTs used as METs to ensure COI T/O&E, training and output standards are developed and provide adequate ability to assess their METL’s readiness within DRRS-MC.
CD&I facilitates new or modified changes to MCTs within MCTIMS Task Master for immediate use by COI as a reportable MET within their METL
COI identified METs are reflected in the COI Mission Statement within TFSMS to support TOECR change modifications.
MET/METL Review and Staffing TIMELINE/Suspense: 45-day Working Group staffing of deliverables conducted by MARFORCOM for COI/Advocate review/concurrence
MET/METL Review LEAD: COI HHQ, Advocate
MET/METL Review and Development Workshops is a collaborative meeting with COI reps, conducted with guidance by CD&I/CDD MCTL Branch and TFSD, TECOM Ground and Aviation Sections, and MARFORCOM G3/5/7.
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED 29

30. The MCTL/METL Life Cycle supports Future Capability Development
and
Acquisition/Procurement Strategies
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

31. DC CD&I: …“Produce an Enhanced MCEIP Chapter 8”
MCT / MET / METL Life Cycle Process ISO Capability Portfolio Management via…
Force Structure Plans
Core METs / METLs
TEEP / TPFDD
PP&O / MFC “Playbook”
DRRS-MC
Fielding/Disposal Plans
MCSHA
v1.0: POM-17 MCEIP
v2.0: POM-18 MCEIP
Expeditionary Force 21
MCSCP
Capability Portfolio Management (CPM) Implementation Goal: Evaluating current and future ROI; identify funding stream alignments where possible; coordinate POM strategies and budgetary allocations measured against CMC prioritized requirements (CCDR/COCOM Directed Mission METs/METLs).
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

32. The Marine Corps Capabilities List (MCCL) Marine Gap List (MGL)
Aligned to 9 Joint Capability** Areas (JCA):
1 – Force Support
2 – Battlespace Awareness
3 – Force Application
4 – Logistics
5 – Command and Control
6 – Communications & Computers
7 – Protection
8 – Building Partnerships
9 – Corporate Management
**Capability — The ability to achieve a desired effect under
specified standards and conditions through a combination of
means and ways across DOTMLPF to perform a set of “Tasks”
to execute a specified COA. (CJCSI B)
Can identify a Current Capability aligned to a MCT in MCTL
or a Future capability that can be developed for entry into MCTL
Capability “Gaps” requiring resource development
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

33. ACMC/CMC: “…assigns DC CD&I as the capability portfolio integrator.”
Capability Portfolio Management
Across the DOTMLPF and JCAs
Current
MCTs/METs
Future
METs/METLs
JCA
JCA
JCA
JCA
JCA
JCA
JCA
JCA
JCA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SE
Mission Thread
Mission Support
Unit
SPMAGTF
Security
Cooperation
MEU
Crisis
Response
MEB / MEF
MCO
MARFOR
Cross-portfolio integration, in the context of Expeditionary Force 21 & MCSCP
METs/METLs provide the cross-cutting constructs that connect the stovepipes of the JCAs
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

34. METs/METLs Role in the Building Blocks of a Balanced Force
High Quality People
Unit Readiness – DRRS-MC
Capability and Capacity
vs. Requirements
Service Level Outcomes
Unit Level Assigned Missions
Unit Level Core Missions
Manage/Sustain
the Total Force
Installation Services ISO
Operational Mission
Modernize Toward Expeditionary Force 21
Funding, Data, Marine Corps Enterprise Network (MCEN)
Service Tempo
Force Capacity
Man/Train/Equip
Other Service
Dependencies
METs/METLs = Personnel (P); Equipment Condition (R); Supply (S); Training (T)
Operational Outcomes
that
Require Funding
Relate Resources to Mission Readiness, Capabilities & Outcomes
Investment Impacts
Aggregate Operational Goals
Mission Assurance Assessments
Sourcing Impacts
Infrastructure Sustainment
Equipment Modernization
Recruit
Train & Educate
Manage & Retain
Sustain Quality
of Life
Facilities Support
Facilities Protection
CMD & Staff Support
I/T
Training & OPS
Support
Logistics Support
Fielding Plans
Acquisition: Cost /
Schedule /
Performance
Funding Profiles
Future Req’ts
Platform / Equip Age
Funding Investments that
Support the Force
Targeted Investment Goals

35. Overview of PPBE Process
NSS
CMC CPG
DPG
NDS
QDR
NMS
EF-21
PP&O
&
CD&I (Futures)
CD&I (CDD)
Guidance
POM
Planning
Programming
Budgeting
Appropriations Act PB
Execution
OPFOR / SE
Assessment
MCSHA
P&R (PA&E)
P&R
ADC (P)
ADC (R)
MCEIP
METs/METLs
DRRS-MC
End of FY
Congressional Approval
Approved MCSCP
Approved MCEIP
Start of
POM-2-Budget Transition
MCSCP
Approved MCSHA
Approved Strategic Plan (EF-21)
= MROC
Mid-Year Review
Front End Assessment / Program Reviews
PEB outbriefs
T/POM Approval
POM Approval (EMROC)
MCCL
MCGL
MCSDD
Integrated
Program
(IPA)
PMF
FY20+
FY19
POM-18
FY17
PB-15
PB-16
MROC Information Update
ECMP
= Transition
= document
Inside circle = process output
Outside circle = process input
= CPRB
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

36. METs/METLs Role in P&R’s MC Strategic Health Assessment (MCSHA)
FOUO // SEE DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
METs/METLs Role in P&R’s MC Strategic Health Assessment (MCSHA)
POM and Budgetary re-alignments resulting from P&R’s execution cycle and MCSHA analytics impact future force capability and resource development
MCSHA 2012
MCSHA 2013
MCSHA 2014
How well did the USMC execute the Budget?
CMC Strategic
Guidance
CD&I / CDD Force Develop. / CPM Implementation
-TFSD
-MCT/MET/METL
-UUNS/DUNS
-CBA/MCEIP
POM & Budget Development
-Prog. Reviews
-PEBs
-PWGs
-POM / T-POM
Building Blocks of a Balanced Force
Program Metrics / Analysis
Acquisitions, Budget Strategies,
RDT&E, Fielding
MCTs/METs
Current and Future Capabilities
Development
Performance
Results
Current “State” of the USMC
Integrated relationships between capabilities development, future planned and current resources with performance indicators provide a Performance Management Framework (PMF)
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED
FOUO // SEE DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

37. 1. USMC MCTIMS Task Master 2. HQMC CD&I SharePoint Platform
MCTL Branch products:
1. USMC MCTIMS Task Master
2. HQMC CD&I SharePoint Platform
3. MCCDC / CD&I Website
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED

38. QUESTIONS? MARYROI GOLDMAN, CIV MCTL Branch Head
(703) / DSN
MARIO MARTINEZ, CIV
MCTL Program Assistant
(703) / DSN
Jul 2015
UNCLASSIFIED