1. 400 Years of Immigration: New Ethnicities, Popular Reaction, and Policy: 1607 to 2007 1900 Brian Gratton, Arizona State University, 2007 All Copyrights Reserved for Brian Gratton. Do not use without permission.

2. New Ethnicities: Four Critical Periods: volume rose sharply & ethnic mix changed dramatically -1st 1740-1760 -2 nd 1840-1860, 1870-1890 -3rd 1900-1914, 1918-1921 -4 th 1965--

3. Popular Reaction At times neutral, at times hostile, never enthusiastic, the American people have consistently opposed higher levels of immigration When in favor, natives have generally called for assimilation to “American norms” Still, there is a strain of multiculturalism dating at least to the 19 th century

4. Policy: Largely ignores popular opinion ……But, there are exceptions

5. HST554 Phase 1: 1740—1770 The Religious, The Greedy, and the Unwilling Englishmen and Africans

6. Africans leave Africa, But NOT Freely Slave caravan in Africa Slave ship on the Middle Passage

7. HST554 Phase 2: 1840-1860, 1870—1890 the Catholic Threat Germans and Irish Scandinavians Family, Farming, Factory

8. German Immigrants and Prosperity: New Ulm, Minnesota

9. Irish as Exiles: Impoverished--slow mobility

10. Phase 3: 1900—1914, 1918-1921: European Europeans and Worse Southern and Eastern Europe Industrialization’s Lure Remigration RESTRICTION!

11. Here they come, straight from Southern and Eastern Europe … Thomas Edison Film, 1903

13. Phase 4: 1965 to 2007…The Gates Reopen Latin Americans Asians Illegal Immigration

14. Vietnamese in Ho Chi Minh city Asian next to Latin Americans in number Asian Immigration: Refugees and Economic Migrants

15. Familiar scene but began during the Bracero guestworker program Illegal Immigration from Mexico

16. Mexico – Guatemala Border Latin Americans Struggle North, without papers

17. How Many and Who Are They?: Sharp changes in volume of immigrant flow and percent of U.S. population Sharp changes in ethnic origin

18. Real Data 1850 to 2006 Projections toward 2050 Error in Estimation Foreign Born, Their Children, and Total Foreign Origin

19. Immigrants by Period—Change in Ethnic Mix 1 st & 2 nd : British, African, German, Irish 3 rd : Eastern & Southern Europe 4 th : Asians and Latinos

20. Popular Reaction:1607 to 2007 Positive: employers, national elites, ethnic groups affected, multiculturalists Neutral and shifting: middle class groups Opposed: working class, African-Americans, native Hispanics, assimilationists, racists

21. Shift toward Opposition When level of immigration rises rapidly When ethnic mix in immigration changes When economy in US sours War or other national threat

22. Evidence Before Opinion Polls Regular Nativist Movements: politically powerful only in 1850s, 1905-1921, 2005-- Positions taken by Unions and other organizations Rising Roll Call Votes in Congress for restriction Occasional direct evidence of popular view

23. * 1895, 1896, and 1897, survey of wage earners: 95% supported restriction or suppression; 60% of immigrant workers favored restriction, and 40% full suppression. * The Chicago Defender, African American newspaper 1924: “… keep the immigration gates partly closed until our working class gets a chance to prove our worth... With the average American white man's turn of mind, the white foreign laborer is given preference over the black home product. When the former is not available, the latter gets an inning.” Direct Evidence

24. Positive and Negative Images of Immigrants 1900: Restrictionist Point of View

25. 1865: Irish and Germans

26. 1896: Jews and Italians

27. 1888: A Positive View Early multiculturalist perspective

28. 1907: Life Magazine

29. Best Guesses before Current Period on Popular Opinion 1740-1760: Majority in Favor of Immigration, including African slaves 1840-1860/1870-1890: Majority in Favor of strong restrictions on Catholic Immigration 1900-1914/1918-1921: Overwhelming Majority in favor of restrictions on Europeans 1965: Small majority in favor of reopening the door

30. Current Popular Opinion Rising hostility toward level at which people vote on the issue. Ambiguity about which policy preferred. No ambiguity about illegal immigration and amnesty

32. Question differs in 2006, but 2007 Times poll confirms trend toward greater concern. Essential for voting patterns. How much do you worry about illegal immigration?

33. Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants? August 2001 2006 poll on amnesty: Favorable 32% Unfavorable 60% 2007 Poll on allowing resident illegals to become citizens--does not mention amnesty: 36% Favor 42% Could return 20% No

34. Ambiguity While amnesty is loathed, and other questions elicit near majorities (building a wall), letting those in line come first, employer sanctions (local or federal) Most polls show support of guestworker programs and even paths to citizenship for those already here

35. Policy: Four BIG Points 1.Parties make immigration policy in Congress. 2.Since 1800 the two parties, for different reasons, have supported immigration in the face of negative public opinion. 3. As hostility rises, the failure of the parties to respond leads to political revolt and extreme legislation 4. Such a divide exists today

36. Major Policy 1607 to 1881: Open doors 1882: first exclusion of Asians 1921-1964: National Origins Acts: restricts European immigration. Only successful broad restriction 1965: Immigration Act: reopens immigration from all countries 2007?????

37. What Do the Parties Propose? Demo platform in 2004 “Today's immigration laws do not reflect our values ….. Undocumented immigrants within our borders who clear a background check, work hard and pay taxes should have a path to earn full participation in America.”

38. Republican Platform 2004 “A growing economy requires a growing number of workers, and President Bush has proposed a new temporary worker program …. This new program would allow workers who currently hold jobs to come out of the shadows and to participate legally in America’s economy”

39. Dissonance between Politicians and the Public Propositions in Arizona in 2006 —popular reaction to impasse with parties, using progressive democratic tools Grant Woods, Janet N., churches, professors, i.e., all the elites v. but 70+% of the public on every proposition Result: harsh legislation and politicians veering off into the stratosphere