Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Wave Energy Technologies: Criteria for Success

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Wave Energy Technologies: Criteria for Success"— Presentation transcript:

1 Wave Energy Technologies: Criteria for Success
Max Carcas, Managing Director, Caelulum Ltd ISLAND ENERGY TRANSITIONS: PATHWAYS FOR ACCELERATED UPTAKE OF RENEWABLES Martinique, June 22-24, 2015

2 Caelulum Independent company providing management and consultancy services in offshore renewables Strategy advice to government in renewables adoption Experienced in bringing new products to market and market enablement >£70m funding raised in investment, sales, grants in marine renewables Sales and joint ventures established with leading utilities and energy companies

3 Wave Energy Waves formed by interaction of the wind with the sea
Swell waves travel for thousands of miles without losing energy Very concentrated form of renewable energy Wave energy – stored, concentrated, wind energy

4 Predictability Benefits from consistent trade winds
Immunity to local climatic effects Small hourly & diurnal variation Numerous calibrated WIND-WAVE models Existing offshore forecasting services Wave power is also far more predictable than wind or solar power, an important issue for generators if the amount of electricity bid for in typical hourly trading slots is under or over supplied. Waves can travel great distances across oceans without losing energy; wind and solar are heavily influenced by local conditions that can be quick to change and difficult to predict. Pictures show five day forecasts for wave height and period (wave energy = height squared x period). However wave energy also does not change quickly – you just don’t get big waves one moment, nothing the next, so persistence tracking (ie no forecasting) can actually be pretty accurate in itself.

5 How much power can we get from ocean waves?
Length of coastline in m (eg 0 – 2000km) Efficiency of wave energy capture (0-100%) Wave Power generation in kW Time period between wave crests (seconds) P = L . W. E T Wave Power kW per metre of wave front H – peak to trough wave height (metres) W = ρ g² H² T 32π x 1000 ρ - sea water density = 1024kg/m³ g – gravitational acceleration = 9.8 m/s²

6 How much is there? 60km x 15kW/m (est) = 900MW average; = 7.8TWh/year
….€2.7bn/year 35c/kWh [Martinique demand = 1.1 TWh/year, ie average of 125MW]

7 What about the technology?
Key requirements: Installability Survivability Reliability Maintainability Operability Cost effectiveness Pelamis Wave Power Aquamarine Power Vital to have a fully engineered solution to the all the requirements above to deliver commercial farm operation

8 Building on offshore technology
The offshore/marine sector’s contribution: “No major technical barriers to the development of wave energy prototypes have been identified. All issues raised under design, construction, deployment and operation can be addressed by transfer of technology from other industries, especially the offshore industry” DTI Report - Wave Energy: Technology Transfer & R&D Recommendations Ove Arup, October 2000 Worth pointing out that huge amount of infrastructure and investment deployed in the North Sea since the 70s is for a resource that will have been completely used up after only 60 years (despite taking millions of years to accumulate). Perhaps wave energy at scale is not such a crazy idea given that the resource will never run out? Although the UK oil and gas sector is in decline the many synergies mean there is potential for the sector to move into this field.

9 Wave technology path to success
4. The vision - Significant economic, environmental and energy system benefits 3. Sustainable business model Virtuous circle of cost reduction profitable projects profitable technology suppliers £ /MWh with 1GW deployed 2. First investible power projects Key performance indicators validated Risks reduced that could impact projected returns £305/MWh; projects <30MW 1. Full scale prototypes Generating electricity Technology validation & iteration £305/MWh + capital grant

10 Where are we now? 1904 2006

11 Commercial criteria Energy yield (eg 25-35% capacity factor)
Validated power curve over tidal cycle Availability (eg 80-95%) Validated reliability and maintainability, ideally over period of 2-3 years Capital costs (eg £3-7m/MW) Correlation between prototype and production Ratio of fixed costs in project to variable costs Operating costs (eg 4-6% Capex/annum) Grid costs Ratio of fixed costs to variable costs Lifetime (eg years) Design & validation Other risks eliminated/reduced Wake effects, electrical interconnection, environmental

12 Technology take-off

13 What to finance? PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BUILD PROJECT OPERATION
Project Owner Build (9-24 months) Wave Energy Converter assembly & installation Component suppliers, subcontractors, fabricators, vessel operators Balance of plant supply, substation, submarine cable, network upgrades Project Owner Operation (>20 years) Wave Energy Converter operation & maintenance Component suppliers, vessel operators Balance of plant maintenance, Insurers, site owner/lessor Project Developer Development (1-3 yrs) Wave Energy Converter Technical feasibility studies Environmental & Technical consultants, Stakeholders, Government, etc Electricity consumer

14 Who to finance? Utilities Energy companies Independent power producers
Pure project developers Pure financiers Industrials Suppliers/ Contractors Public sector

15 Decision factors for a project financier
Data from Test centre prototype COSTS OF: Machine Installation O&M Insurance Grid connection Permitting & EIA Seabed lease Resource data for site INCOME: - Grants - Tariff - Energy Forecast Data from Test centre prototype Financial Model Machine Power curve Likely project return defined FINANCE/DEBT: On balance sheet or limited recourse? Contracts/Terms Coverage ratios Warranties CONSENTS & PERMITS: Environmental Seabed lease Fishing/Navigation Onshore equip. GRANTS - secured CONTRACT PREPARATION: PPA EPC I, O & M Grid connection Grant Assistance Insurance Approach to financing Likely return on equity defined Data from Test centre prototype RISKS: Machine: Survivability Reliability Availability Maintainability Operability Political: Tariff variation Contractual: - Warranties Does return on equity balance risk? All conditions precedent met? YES YES Execute contracts, release finance Order Machines OTHER BENEFITS Eg: PR, First Mover, Exclusivity, Tech rights

16 Hurdle rate => Need to get above the line…. TEST & VALIDATION
INCREEASD YIELD COST REDUCTION TEST & VALIDATION

17 Affect of cost of finance

18 Diesel vs Wave comparison - same cost of energy….!

19 Need for scale - Capex

20 Need for scale – O&M

21 Project phasing Reduces risk Easier to scale
Potential for grant funding for initial phase

22 Back to the future? Back to the Future? Wind 1980: ~10MW installed?
Typical turbine 75kW Capacity Factor 12% (1985, California) Annual average: 9kW Wind 2012: >100GW Europe alone Typical turbine 3MW Capacity factor 30% (2012, California) Annual average: 900kW Back to the Future?

23 Opportunities for Martinique and other islands
Use only indigenous energy resources Develop marine energy solutions appropriate to local conditions Create conditions for inward investment Create business and jobs – not just in technologies but also support services, tourism relating to innovative projects Protect the environment But first – understand what you have and where you want to get to!


Download ppt "Wave Energy Technologies: Criteria for Success"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google