Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Proving Program Correctness The Axiomatic Approach.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Proving Program Correctness The Axiomatic Approach."— Presentation transcript:

1 Proving Program Correctness The Axiomatic Approach

2 What is Correctness? Correctness: –partial correctness + termination Partial correctness: –Program implements its specification

3 Proving Partial Correctness Goal: prove that program is partially correct Approach: model computation with predicates –Predicates are boolean functions over program state Simple example –{odd(x)} a = x {odd(a)} Generally: {P} S {Q}, where –P  precondition –Q  postcondition –S  Programming language statement

4 Proof System Two elements of proof system –Axioms: capture the effect of prog. lang. stmts. –Inference rules: compose axioms to build up proofs of entire program behavior Let’s start by discussing inference rules and then we’ll return to discussing axioms

5 Composition Rule: Consider two predicates –{odd(x+1)} x = x+1 {odd(x)} –{odd(x)} a = x {odd(a)} What is the effect of executing both stmts? –{odd(x+1)} x = x+1 ; a = x {odd(a)}

6 Consequence 1 Rule Ex: –{odd(x)} a = x {odd(a)} and –Postcondition  {a  4} What can we say about this program?

7 Consequence 2 Rule: Ex: –Precondition  {x=1} and –{odd(x)} a = x {odd(a)} What can we say about this program?

8 Axioms Axioms explain the effect of executing a single statement Axioms will be derived “backwards.” –Start with postcondition and determine what conditions must be true on entry to stmt.

9 Assignment Axiom Rule: Replace all free occurences of x with y –e.g., {odd(x)} a = x {odd(a)}

10 Conditional Stmt 1 Axiom Rule: B if S {P} {P   B if }{P  B if } {Q}

11 Conditional Stmt 1 Example: 1.if even(x) then { 2. x = x +1 3.} {odd(x)  x > 3} else part (??   even(x)  (odd(x)  x>3) then part: {odd(x+1)  x>2} x = x+1 {odd(x)  x > 3} (??  even(x))  (odd(x+1)  x>2) P  ((odd(x+1)  x>2)  x >3) –x > 3 works as well.

12 Conditional Stmt 2 Axiom Rule {P} {P   B if } {Q} S2S2 S1S1 {P  B if } B if

13 Conditional Stmt 2 Axiom Example: 1.if x < 0 then { 2. x = -x; y = x 3.else 4.y = x 5.} {y = |x|} Then part: {x = |x|} y = x {y = |x|} {-x = |x|} x = -x {x = |x|} ( ??  x <0)  -x = |x| Else part: {x =|x|} y=x{y=|x|} ( ??  ¬(x < 0))  x = |x| P  (-x = |x|)  (x=|x|)

14 While Loop Axiom Rule Infinite number of paths, so we need one predicate for that captures the effect of S P is called an invariant B if S {P} {P   B}

15 While Loop Axiom Example IN  {B  0} –a = A –b = B –y = 0 –while b > 0 do { –y = y + a –b = b - 1 –}–} OUT  {y = AB} INV  y + ab = AB  b  0 B w  b > 0 Show INV  ¬ B w  OUT y + ab = AB  b  0  ¬(b > 0) y + ab = AB  b = 0 y = AB So {INV  ¬ B w }  OUT Establish IN  INV {ab = AB  b  0} y=0 { INV} {aB = AB  B  0} b = B {….} {AB = AB  B  0} a = A {….} So {IN } a=A;b=B;y=0 {INV}

16 While Loop Axiom Need to show {INV  B w } loop body {INV} {y+a(b-1) = AB  b-1  0} b = b - 1 {INV} {y+a+a(b-1) = AB  b-1  0} y = y+a {….} {y +ab = AB  b-1  0} loop body {INV} y + ab = AB  b  0  b > 0  {y +ab = AB  b-1  0}, So –{IN} lines 1-3} {INV}, –{INV} while loop {INV  ¬ B w }, and –{INV  ¬ B w }  OUT Therefore –{IN} program {OUT}

17 Total correctness After you have shown partial correctness –Need to prove that program terminates Usually a progress argument. Last program –Loop terminates if b  0 –b starts positive and is decremented by 1 every iteration –So loop must eventually terminate


Download ppt "Proving Program Correctness The Axiomatic Approach."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google