1. Reduced scope Environmental, land use and social impacts, as in original DoW – 12 chapters Focus on the primary user, EC officer, maybe sectoral issues Russian version can be reduced variant SIA retained Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008

7. Chapter 1. Sustainable Development in a European policy context Sustainable development: environment, economy, society policies and practices in EU and Russia intra-generational equity EU regions, proportionality, subsidiarity, stakeholders Sustainability Science. e- LUP approach writers: NERI, HEL, ERI, EAC, others Chapter 2. Impact Assessment; concepts, guidelines, practices SIA/IA/SA/RIA EU impact assessment, procedures. EU impact assessment, experiences. RF impact assessment. Member states impact assessment. writers: HEL, NERI, EAC others Chapter 3. Tools for Impact Assessment; Qualitative tools Dynamic models. Land use integrated models. Indicator sets. Statistics and databases GIS and remote sensing. writers: HEL, Zalf and others Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008 Part I CONCEPTS

9. Urgent needs –Quality of texts –Policy relevance of texts –SIA usefulness of texts –Feedback on quality –Feedback on usability –Feedback of potential end users –Awareness of relevant projects, sources –Communicating with relevant … –e-learning technologies and pedagogics –Integration of cases and models –Keep the timetable Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008

10. Urgent needs & actions –Quality of texts / focus on end user – new chapter template –reviews (below) –Policy relevance of texts / monitoring – chapter guideline – policy cases –SIA usefulness of texts / monitoring – chapter guideline – policy cases –Feedback on quality / internal review – advisory board – external review –Feedback on usability / the above – testing phase –Feedback of potential end users / adv board – EC meeting –Awareness of relevant projects, sources /survey report – chapter team webpages –Communicating with relevant … / identifying synergies, contacting … –e-learning technologies and pedagogics / embedded tools (Cmap…, multimedia, interactivity enhancement –Integration of cases and models / WP2, 3 and 4 action plans –Keep the timetable / new schedule and responsibilities, coordinator Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008

11. (vii) Survey of related projects A 2nd version is needed – a closer analysis of the related projects will be of great help in (a) tailoring the new e- LUP methodology, (b) selecting projects to be contacted, (c) conclusions on state of the art in SIA tools and models for our Chapter 3 ’Tools’. Survey contains chapter level tables, to be transfered to e-LUP project website for further elaboration by chapter teams in communication with the outer world. Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008

12. (viii) time chart / workplan Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008

13. WP 6 Testing Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008 testing in 5 jurisdictions, originally 3 Starting in January 2009; planning of questionnaires (SPbSU and HEL) external review and compilation of results

14. WP 6 Testing (2) WP6 partners will arrange mini-workshops at their facilities, gathering small groups of civil servants and policy makers exposed to SIA or strategic planning issues for test runs of the e-tool. Preceded by lecture on SIA at EC, the IA practice in particular jurisdictions might be quite different from EC model. In that case the question posed: is the EC model desirable? Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008

15. Project management report 2+ Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008 Budget > spent period 1 > spent p2 > spent + 4 months > spent total

16. WP 6 Testing (2) WP6 partners will arrange mini-workshops at their facilities, gathering small groups of civil servants and policy makers exposed to SIA or strategic planning issues for test runs of the e-tool. Preceded by lecture on SIA at EC, the IA practice in particular jurisdictions might be quite different from EC model. In that case the question posed: is the EC model desirable? Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008