Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Simulation and Control Aspects of FHT M. V. Sivaselvan CO-PI CU-NEES Assistant Professor Dept. of Civil, Environmental.

Published by Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Simulation and Control Aspects of FHT M. V. Sivaselvan CO-PI CU-NEES Assistant Professor Dept. of Civil, Environmental."— Presentation transcript:

1 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Simulation and Control Aspects of FHT M. V. Sivaselvan CO-PI CU-NEES Assistant Professor Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Eng. University of Colorado at Boulder siva@colorado.edu

2 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Outline What is hybrid simulation? Why do it? Challenges in implementing a hybrid simulation system Types of hybrid simulation Hybrid simulation algorithms – architecture and equivalence Hybrid testing with shaking tables Current and planned work, Conclusions

3 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Outline What is hybrid simulation? Why do it? Challenges in implementing a hybrid simulation system Types of hybrid simulation Hybrid simulation algorithms – architecture and equivalence Hybrid testing with shaking tables Current and planned work, Conclusions

4 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Multi-story Building Earthquake Most damage happens here – need better understanding by experimentation Rest of the structure is undamaged – does not have to be physically build in the laboratory

5 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Wall Specimen Actuators Physical Experiment Computer Model Interact during the experiment to mimic testing the whole building

6 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Outline What is hybrid simulation? Why do it? Challenges in implementing a hybrid simulation system Types of hybrid simulation Hybrid simulation algorithms – architecture and equivalence Hybrid testing with shaking tables Current and planned work, Conclusions

7 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Use of hybrid simulation Laboratory Testing For Qualification For Discovery Develop or calibrate Material/system models Examine the performance of a component in its host environment Proof of concept tests Interaction with surroundings may significantly modify input Hybrid simulation is useful Hybrid simulation not very useful for this purpose Some kind of computation-in- the-loop with geometric reasoning about state-space may be possible Hybrid Simulation is useful for qualification/proof-of-concept testing when the interaction of a component with its surroundings needs to be accurately represented

8 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Outline What is hybrid simulation? Why do it? Challenges in implementing a hybrid simulation system Types of hybrid simulation Hybrid simulation algorithms – architecture and equivalence Hybrid testing with shaking tables Current and planned work, Conclusions

9 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Feedback interaction in reality Substructure 1 Computational Substructure 2 Physical External Input (Eg. Ground Motion) Boundary Condition Work Conjugate Boundary Condition

10 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop In hybrid simulation however … Substructure 1 Computational Substructure 2 Physical External Input (Eg. Ground Motion) Boundary Condition Work Conjugate Boundary Condition Actuator / Transfer Device

11 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop In hybrid simulation however … Substructure 1 Computational Substructure 2 Physical External Input (Eg. Ground Motion) Boundary Condition Work Conjugate Boundary Condition Actuator / Transfer Device Sensor

12 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop In hybrid simulation however … Substructure 1 Computational Substructure 2 Physical External Input (Eg. Ground Motion) Boundary Condition Work Conjugate Boundary Condition Actuator / Transfer Device Sensor Natural Physical Feedback

13 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop In hybrid simulation however … Substructure 1 Computational Substructure 2 Physical External Input (Eg. Ground Motion) Boundary Condition Work Conjugate Boundary Condition Actuator / Transfer Device Sensor Natural Physical Feedback Actuator Feedback

14 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop In hybrid simulation however … Substructure 1 Computational Substructure 2 Physical External Input (Eg. Ground Motion) Boundary Condition Work Conjugate Boundary Condition Actuator / Transfer Device Sensor Natural Physical Feedback Actuator Feedback NEW DYNAMICS

15 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Challenges These additional dynamics create significant problems When the structure to be simulated is lightly damped, almost always renders the system unstable Need to develop control algorithms to make hybrid simulation possible Causality → Design of such algorithms requires knowledge about physical substructure (predictive model, implicit integration etc.) → This is a conflict → Robustness of algorithm with respect to modeling of the physical substructure A numerical algorithm need not be causal, a hybrid simulation algorithm does

16 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Outline What is hybrid simulation? Why do it? Challenges in implementing a hybrid simulation system Types of hybrid simulation Hybrid simulation algorithms – architecture and equivalence Hybrid testing with shaking tables Current and planned work, Conclusions

17 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Hybrid Simulation Pseudo-dynamic Dynamic Substructure 1 Computational Substructure 2 Physical External Input (Eg. Ground Motion) Boundary Condition Work Conjugate Boundary Condition Has no inertia effects of interest Born from the displacement-based finite element – one of the elements is now physical ! Algorithms also reflect this If in addition, there are no frequency-dependent behavior is the physical substructure – can be done as slowly as we want to Substructure 1 Computational Substructure 2 Physical External Input (Eg. Ground Motion) Boundary Condition Work Conjugate Boundary Condition Has significant inertia effects More practical applications necessitate this form of hybrid simulation My research is in this area

18 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Hybrid Simulation Pseudo-dynamic Dynamic Real-time Slow CU NEES Site Hybrid simulation with Shaking Tables CU NEES Site

19 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Outline What is hybrid simulation? Why do it? Challenges in implementing a hybrid simulation system Types of hybrid simulation Hybrid simulation algorithms – architecture and equivalence Hybrid testing with shaking tables Current and planned work, Conclusions

20 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Recall Substructure 1 Computational Substructure 2 Physical External Input Boundary Condition Work Conjugate Boundary Condition Actuator / Transfer Device Sensor Natural Physical Feedback Actuator Feedback Motivation: Want actuator to behave the same way as Substructure 1

21 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Introduce a controller Substructure 1 Computational Substructure 2 Physical External Input Boundary Condition Work Conjugate Boundary Condition Actuator / Transfer Device Natural Physical Feedback Actuator Feedback Controller

22 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Introduce a controller Substructure 1 Computational Substructure 2 Physical External Input Work Conjugate Boundary Condition Actuator / Transfer Device Natural Physical Feedback Actuator Feedback Controller Takes the same input as Substructure 1 Boundary Condition + -  Tries to do the same Thing as Substructure 1 Error

23 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Model Reference Control Controller designed so that does the same thing as Part implemented in the computer

24 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Another Approach Internal Model Control - IMC Part implemented in the computer

25 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Equivalence of different approaches The two approaches can be shown to be shown to be different parametrizations of a 2 DOF controller Each offers a different perspective –MRC useful in design –IMC useful in robustness analysis

26 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop CU FHT Algorithm Computer implementation of IMC Discretize at 10 msDiscretize at 1 ms CU FHT Algorithm !! (Shing et. al., 2005)

27 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Outline What is hybrid simulation? Why do it? Challenges in implementing a hybrid simulation system Types of hybrid simulation Hybrid simulation algorithms – architecture and equivalence Hybrid testing with shaking tables Current and planned work, Conclusions

28 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Hybrid Simulation with a Shaking Table Necessary when physical substructure has distributed mass Masses simulated Physical substructure has no masses of significance, hence no inertia effects (Hence pseudo-dynamic) In many cases of practical interest for hybrid simulation, mass is distributed and there is no such natural way of lumping the mass for substructuring. Examples: –Nonstructural components in civil structures –Payloads in aerospace structures –Machine components –Dams, chimneys and other continuum civil structures –Soil / fluid-structure interaction The interface device must be able to dynamically excited a system with distributed mass – shaking table

29 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Outline What is hybrid simulation? Why do it? Challenges in implementing a hybrid simulation system Types of hybrid simulation Hybrid simulation algorithms – architecture and equivalence Hybrid testing with shaking tables Current and planned work, Conclusions

30 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Hybrid Testing with Shaking Tables 1.5 m x 1.5 m working area +/- 200 mm dynamic stroke Frequency range – 0-50 Hz Maximum payload – 2000 kg Maximum Acceleration – 1.0-2.9 g Maximum Velocity – 1 m/s Will give CU structures lab capability to perform such hybrid simulations as listed in the previous slide Collaboration with MTS Systems Physical Substructure Computational Substructure Shaking Table External Actuator Computational Substructure Physical Substructure Response Feedback Reaction Wall Shaking Table Physical Substructure Response Feedback Hybrid Simulation Configurations Combination of Shaking Table and External Actuator Shaking Table Only

31 Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Conclusions Hybrid simulation – online combination of computation and physical experimentation Useful for qualification/proof-of-concept testing when the interaction of a component with its surroundings needs to be accurately represented Challenge – added dynamics and feedback paths created by the transfer system/actuator applying that applied interface conditions between the two substructures. More difficult in dynamic hybrid simulation where physical substructure has significant inertia (as opposed to pseudo-dynamic) Algorithms based on a control-systems perspective offer more promise than those motivated by the finite element method

Download ppt "Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Simulation and Control Aspects of FHT M. V. Sivaselvan CO-PI CU-NEES Assistant Professor Dept. of Civil, Environmental."

Similar presentations

Model-based Real-Time Hybrid Simulation for Large-Scale Experimental Evaluation Brian M. Phillips University of Illinois B. F. Spencer, Jr. University.

Model-based Real-Time Hybrid Simulation for Large-Scale Experimental Evaluation Brian M. Phillips University of Illinois B. F. Spencer, Jr. University.
Structural Dynamics Laboratory Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology,

Structural Dynamics Laboratory Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology,
Hybrid Simulation with On-line Updating of Numerical Model Based on Measured Experimental Behavior M. Javad Hashemi, Armin Masroor, and Gilberto Mosqueda.

Hybrid Simulation with On-line Updating of Numerical Model Based on Measured Experimental Behavior M. Javad Hashemi, Armin Masroor, and Gilberto Mosqueda.
An Introduction to Hybrid Simulation – Displacement-Controlled Methods

An Introduction to Hybrid Simulation – Displacement-Controlled Methods
Hybrid simulation evaluation of the suspended zipper braced frame Tony Yang Post-doctoral scholar University of California, Berkeley Acknowledgements:

Hybrid simulation evaluation of the suspended zipper braced frame Tony Yang Post-doctoral scholar University of California, Berkeley Acknowledgements:
Seismic Performance Evaluation of Energy Efficient Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) Using Hybrid Simulation and Cyclic Testing SELIM GÜNAY, POSTDOCTORAL.

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Energy Efficient Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) Using Hybrid Simulation and Cyclic Testing SELIM GÜNAY, POSTDOCTORAL.
Mechanics Based Modeling of the Dynamic Response of Wood Frame Building By Ricardo Foschi, Frank Lam,Helmut Prion, Carlos Ventura Henry He and Felix Yao.

Mechanics Based Modeling of the Dynamic Response of Wood Frame Building By Ricardo Foschi, Frank Lam,Helmut Prion, Carlos Ventura Henry He and Felix Yao.
ADVANCED DYNAMIC TESTING TECHNIQUES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING by Andrei M Reinhorn Xiaoyun Shao CIE 616 FALL 2004.

ADVANCED DYNAMIC TESTING TECHNIQUES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING by Andrei M Reinhorn Xiaoyun Shao CIE 616 FALL 2004.
Wall-Following Research Researcher: Benjamin Domingo Mentor: Joey Durham.

Wall-Following Research Researcher: Benjamin Domingo Mentor: Joey Durham.
Experimental Assessment of Coastal Infrastructure Vulnerability Brian M. Phillips Assistant Professor University of Maryland Mpact Week: Disaster Resilience.

Experimental Assessment of Coastal Infrastructure Vulnerability Brian M. Phillips Assistant Professor University of Maryland Mpact Week: Disaster Resilience.
Hybrid Simulation with On-line Updating of Numerical Model based on Measured Experimental Behavior M.J. Hashemi, Armin Masroor, and Gilberto Mosqueda University.

Hybrid Simulation with On-line Updating of Numerical Model based on Measured Experimental Behavior M.J. Hashemi, Armin Masroor, and Gilberto Mosqueda University.
Application of Fluid-Structure Interaction Algorithms to Seismic Analysis of Liquid Storage Tanks Zuhal OZDEMIR, Mhamed SOULI Université des Sciences et.

Application of Fluid-Structure Interaction Algorithms to Seismic Analysis of Liquid Storage Tanks Zuhal OZDEMIR, Mhamed SOULI Université des Sciences et.
ISEE: Internet-based Simulation for Earthquake Engineering Part (I): The Database Approach Yuan-Sen YANG, Shiang-Jung WANG, Kung-Juin WANG, Keh-Chyuan.

ISEE: Internet-based Simulation for Earthquake Engineering Part (I): The Database Approach Yuan-Sen YANG, Shiang-Jung WANG, Kung-Juin WANG, Keh-Chyuan.
Constrained Near-Optimal Control Using a Numerical Kinetic Solver Alan L. Jennings & Ra úl Ordóñez, ajennings1,

Constrained Near-Optimal Control Using a Numerical Kinetic Solver Alan L. Jennings & Ra úl Ordóñez, ajennings1,
Time Varying Structural Behaviour of the PETS “On-Off” mechanism piston movement impact Riku Raatikainen 18.7.2011.

Time Varying Structural Behaviour of the PETS “On-Off” mechanism piston movement impact Riku Raatikainen
Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.

Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.
UNR NEES Training Workshop: “Shake-Table Testing”.

UNR NEES Training Workshop: “Shake-Table Testing”.
Www.sgh.com Keck Telescope Seismic Upgrade Design Support - Progress Report Frank Kan Andrew Sarawit 4 May 2011 (Revised 5 May 2011)

Keck Telescope Seismic Upgrade Design Support - Progress Report Frank Kan Andrew Sarawit 4 May 2011 (Revised 5 May 2011)
Nazgol Haghighat Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ir. Daniel J. Rixen

Nazgol Haghighat Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ir. Daniel J. Rixen
Feb 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Administrative Issues Tom Bowen University of Colorado at Boulder George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering.

Feb 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Administrative Issues Tom Bowen University of Colorado at Boulder George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google