Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Detecting Logic Vulnerabilities in E- Commerce Applications Presenter: Liu Yin Slides Adapted from Fangqi Sun Computer Science Department College of.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Detecting Logic Vulnerabilities in E- Commerce Applications Presenter: Liu Yin Slides Adapted from Fangqi Sun Computer Science Department College of."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Detecting Logic Vulnerabilities in E- Commerce Applications Presenter: Liu Yin Slides Adapted from Fangqi Sun Computer Science Department College of William & Mary

2 2 Outline  Introduction Logic Vulnerabilities in E-Commerce Web Applications Key Challenge Related Work  Attack Examples  Approach Definitions Taint Rules Vulnerability Detection Example Vulnerability Detection Algorithm  Implementation  Evaluation  Conclusion

3 3 Logic Vulnerabilities in E-Commerce Web Applications  Third-party cashiers Bridge the trustiness gap between customers and merchants Complicate logic flows during checkout  Logic vulnerabilities Both track payment status, miscommunication Insufficient or missing checks on payment status Purchase with incorrect or no payment User Merchant Cashier Payment of order total in currency for order ID to merchant ID

4 4 Key Challenge  Logic vulnerabilities in e-commerce web applications are application-specific Thorough code review of all possible logic flows is non-trivial Various application-specific logic flows, cashier APIs and security checks make automated detection difficult  Key challenge of automated detection

5 5 Related Work  Wang et al. [30, 33] First to perform security analysis on Cashier-as-a-Service based e-commerce applications. Found several serious logic vulnerabilities in a few popular e- commerce applications via manual code reviews Proposed a proxy-based approach to dynamically secure third- party web service integrations which include the integration of cashiers  This paper provide an application-independent invariant propose the first static analysis to detect logic vulnerabilities

6 6 Key Insight  A common invariant for automated detection

7 7 Outline  Introduction Logic Vulnerabilities in E-Commerce Web Applications Key Challenge Related Work  Attack Examples  Approach Definitions Taint Rules Vulnerability Detection Example Vulnerability Detection Algorithm  Implementation  Evaluation  Conclusion

8 8 Attack on Currency

9 9 Attack on Order ID

10 10 Attack on Merchant ID

11 11 Illustrative Example Payment module Luottokunta (version 1.3)

12 12 Outline  Introduction Logic Vulnerabilities in E-Commerce Web Applications Key Challenge Related Work  Attack Examples  Approach Definitions Taint Rules Vulnerability Detection Example Vulnerability Detection Algorithm  Implementation  Evaluation  Conclusion

13 13 Approach  Combines symbolic execution and taint analysis to detect violations of the invariant by tracking tainted payment status and analyzing critical logic flows among merchants, cashiers and users.  A symbolic execution framework that explores critical control flows exhaustively  Tracking taint annotations for the critical components Payment status  Order ID, Order total, Merchant ID, Currency Exposed signed token  An encrypted value that is signed with a cashier-merchant secret  Act as cashier’s signature

14 14 Approach - Definition s Merchant Cashier User Logic Flows in E-commerce Applications :  Communications between merchant nodes, cashier nodes and user.  represented as II = {(ni, Qi) -> (nj, Qj) | 0 <i, j<k}. Logic State  Consists of taint annotations and links to other valid nodes of a checkout process.  Logic state stores taint annotations for the following payment status components and exposed signed tokens.( OrderID, OrderTotal, MerchantID, Currency, exposed signed tokens( Secret_key ) ) Logic Vulnerabilities in E-commerce Applications  Exists when for any accepted order ID, the merchant cannot verify that the user has correctly paid the cashier the amount of order total in the expected currency to merchant ID.

15 15 Taint Removal Rules Initially  all tainted. When correctly verifies  the taint should be removed  Conditional checks of (in)equality When an untrusted value is verified against a trusted one Example of removing taint from order total md5(SECRET. $_SESSION[‘order’]  [‘total’]) == md5(SECRET. $_GET[‘oTotal’])  Writes to merchant databases When an untrusted value is included in an INSERT/UPDATE query Merchant employee can easily spot tampered values  Secure communication channels For synchronous merchant-to-cashier cURL requests Remove when payment components are present in request parameters Synchronous requests are sent via secure communication channels, guarantee the authenticity of payment status

16 16 Taint Addition Rules  When a conditional check for a cashier-to-merchant request relies on an exposed signed token, add taint to the exposed signed token.  Example Hidden HTML form element: md5($secret. $orderId. $orderTotal) $_GET['hash'] == md5($secret. $_GET['oId']. $_GET['oTotal']) This exposed signed token md5($secret. $orderId. $orderTotal) nullifies checks on order ID and order total

17 17 Vulnerability Detection Example

18 18

19 19

20 20 Vulnerability Detection Algorithm  It integrates symbolic execution of merchant nodes and taint analysis, and connects individual nodes to explore valid logic flows in e-commerce applications.

21 21

22 22 Outline  Introduction Logic Vulnerabilities in E-Commerce Web Applications Key Challenge Related Work  Attack Examples  Approach Definitions Taint Rules Vulnerability Detection Example Vulnerability Detection Algorithm  Implementation  Evaluation  Conclusion

23 23 Implementation A symbolic execution framework that integrates taint analysis for PHP

24 24 Outline  Introduction Logic Vulnerabilities in E-Commerce Web Applications Key Challenge Related Work  Attack Examples  Approach Definitions Taint Rules Vulnerability Detection Example Vulnerability Detection Algorithm  Implementation  Evaluation  Conclusion

25 25 Evaluation  Subjects: 22 unique payment modules of osCommerce More than 14,000 registered websites, 928 payment modules, 13 years of history (osCommerce v2.3) 20 out of 46 default modules with distinct CFGs 2 Luottokunta payment modules (v1.2 & v1.3)  Metrics Effectiveness: Detected 12 logic vulnerabilities (11 new) with no false positives Performance

26 26

27 27

28 28

29 29 Outline  Introduction Logic Vulnerabilities in E-Commerce Web Applications Key Challenge Related Work  Attack Examples  Approach Definitions Taint Rules Vulnerability Detection Example Vulnerability Detection Algorithm  Implementation  Evaluation  Conclusion

30 30 Conclusion  First static detection of logic vulnerabilities in e- commerce applications Based on an application-independent invariant A scalable symbolic execution framework for PHP applications, incorporating taint tracking of payment status  Three responsible proof-of-concept experiments on live websites  Evaluated our tool on 22 unique payment modules and detected 12 logic vulnerabilities (11 are new)

31 31 End Thanks! Q&A


Download ppt "1 Detecting Logic Vulnerabilities in E- Commerce Applications Presenter: Liu Yin Slides Adapted from Fangqi Sun Computer Science Department College of."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google