Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Missmer, et al. Meat and dairy food consumption and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2002; 31:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Missmer, et al. Meat and dairy food consumption and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2002; 31:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Missmer, et al. Meat and dairy food consumption and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2002; 31: 78-85. Meat, Dairy and Breast Cancer Publication

2 Sweden Mammography Cohort Nurses’ Health Study Netherlands Cohort Study New York State Cohort Iowa Women’s Health Study Canadian National Breast Screening Study Adventist Health Study New York University Women’s Health Study Cohort Studies in the Pooled Analysis of Meat and Dairy Intake and Breast Cancer Total = 351,041 # of cases = 7,379

3 Cohort Studies in the Pooled Analysis of Meat and Dairy Consumption and Breast Cancer Study Baseline No. of Cohort Cases Adventist Health15,172 160 Canadian National56,837 419 Iowa Women’s34,4061130 Netherlands Cohort62,377 937 New York State18,475 367 New York University13,261 385 Nurses’ Health (a)89,0461023 Nurses’ Health (b)68,8171638 Sweden Mammography61,4671320 Missmer, et al. 2002

4 Median Intakes (g/d) Among Control Participants Study Meat Dairy Dairy fluids solids Adventist Health 25 262 28 Canadian National 181 247 34 Iowa Women’s 166 250 23 Netherlands Cohort 106 251 33 New York State ---- ---- ---- New York University 110 209 24 Nurses’ Health (a) 215 203 27 Nurses’ Health (b) 163 231 24 Sweden Mammography91 219 24 Missmer, et al. 2002

5 Pooled Multivariate Relative Risks of Meat and Breast Cancer Quartile Total Meat Red Meat White Meat 1 1.001.00 1.00 2 1.07 1.00 0.99 3 1.02 0.99 1.03 4 1.08 0.94 1.02 (0.98-1.19) (0.87-1.02) (0.91-1.13) p for trend 0.13 0.13 0.21 Missmer, et al. 2002

6 Relative Risk.515 Combined Sweden Nurses' (b) Nurses' (a) NY University NY State Netherlands Iowa Canada Adventist Study-Specific Relative Risks for Red Meat and Breast Cancer (Quartile 4 vs. 1) Missmer, et al. 2002

7 Pooled Multivariate Relative Risks of Specific Red Meats and Breast Cancer Food item RR (95% CI) (increment = 100g/d) Ground beef 1.09 (0.89-1.34) Organ meats 1.07 (0.61-1.88) Processed meats 0.98 (0.96-1.00) Bacon 0.99 (0.89-1.09) Sausage 0.94 (0.83-1.07) Hot dogs 0.75 (0.39-1.44) Missmer, et al. 2002

8 Pooled Multivariate Relative Risks of Specific White Meats and Breast Cancer Food item RR (95% CI) (increment = 100 g/d) Poultry 1.05 (0.96-1.13) Seafood 1.01 (0.87-1.16) Fish 1.01 (0.87-1.17) Shellfish 0.77 (0.39-1.53) Eggs 1.22 (1.03-1.45) Missmer, et al. 2002

9 Pooled Multivariate Relative Risks of Dairy Products and Breast Cancer Quartile Fluids Solids 1 1.00 1.00 2 1.00 1.02 3 0.92 0.94 4 0.93 1.01 (0.84-1.03) (0.93-1.09) p for trend 0.09 0.94 Missmer, et al. 2002

10 Pooled Multivariate Relative Risks of Specific Dairy Items and Breast Cancer RR (95% CI) (increment = 100 g/d) Missmer, et al. 2002 Cheese 1.16 (0.98-1.37) Cottage cheese 0.97 (0.85-1.09) Ice cream 1.03 (0.88-1.22) Milk 0.99 (0.97-1.00) Yogurt 0.98 (0.94-1.01)

11 Pooled Multivariate Relative Risks of Breast Cancer and Meat Consumption by Menopausal Status RR (95% CI) p-for (increment = 100 g/d) interaction Red meat Premeno. 0.97 (0.79-1.20) Postmeno. 0.97 (0.91-1.03) 0.85 White meat Premeno.0.99 (0.79-1.25) Postmeno.1.05 (0.97-1.15) 0.36 Total Meat Premeno.1.00 (0.87-1.14) Postmeno.1.04 (0.99-1.09) 0.99 Missmer, et al. 2002

12 Pooled Multivariate Relative Risk of Breast Cancer and Dairy Consumption by Menopausal Status RR (95% CI) p-for (increment = 100 g/d) interaction Total dairy fluids Premeno. 0.96 (0.90-1.02) Postmeno.1.00 (0.98-1.01) 0.53 Total dairy solids Premeno.0.87 (0.68-1.11) Postmeno.1.05 (0.94-1.16) 0.73 Missmer, et al. 2002


Download ppt "Missmer, et al. Meat and dairy food consumption and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2002; 31:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google