Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Zissimos P. Mourelatos, Associate Prof. Daniel N. Wehrwein, Graduate Student Mechanical Engineering Department Oakland University Modeling and Optimization.

Published by Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1 Zissimos P. Mourelatos, Associate Prof. Daniel N. Wehrwein, Graduate Student Mechanical Engineering Department Oakland University Modeling and Optimization."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Zissimos P. Mourelatos, Associate Prof. Daniel N. Wehrwein, Graduate Student Mechanical Engineering Department Oakland University Modeling and Optimization of Vehicle Drivetrain Dynamic Performance Considering Uncertainty

2 2 Outline  Purpose of study  Dynamic Vehicle Model  Bond Graph Modeling  Optimization Process  Deterministic Optimization  Probabilistic Optimization (RBDO)  Summary and Conclusions

3 3 Purpose of Study Optimize drivetrain performance under uncertainty  Transmission Gear Ratios  Final Drive Ratio (axle ratio)  Transmission Shift Points  Acceleration Performance  Fuel Economy  Trailer Towing Acceleration and Gradability Design Variables Performance Measures

4 4 Vehicle Model

5 5 Bond Graph Modeling  Graphical method for system modeling  Energy based and multidisciplinary  Modular; components can be modeled separately and assembled  Bond graphs and block diagrams are interchangeable. Simulink can be used

6 6 Engine Model  Engine is modeled as a rigid body with friction  Torque input is a look up table of engine speed and throttle position and is based off a steady state torque map Bond Graph Block Diagram

7 7 Torque Converter Model  A complete model would require complex CDF modeling  Dynamometer data is used instead to model torque ratio and converter efficiency

8 8 Transmission Description  GM 4L60E, four speed automatic  Two planetary gear sets in series  Clutch actuation determines gear state  Ratio of sun and ring gear on each planetary gear set determines transmission ratios

9 9 Transmission Model  Planetary gear sets, clutches, and a controller to actuate each clutch are modeled  Each planetary gear set has a sun, a ring, and a planetary gear  Each clutch is actuated through a controller using a shift table. Planetary Gear Set Shift Table

10 10 Driveline and Vehicle Model  Two inertia elements connected by a spring model each shaft  Tire is assumed to be in constant contact with the road  The tire is modeled as a lump inertia with a discrete spring between the tire and the road  The vehicle is modeled as a rigid body with standard rolling resistance and aerodynamic drag 2WD Driveline

11 11 Vehicle Performance Targets Common performance targets for full size trucks:  Acceleration Performance  Gradeability  Trailer Towing Performance  Fuel Economy  Cost, weight, and packaging (not used)

12 12 Drivetrain Optimization Process Optimization design variables :  Transmission planetary ratios  Axle ratio  Transmission shift points Ratios of integers Depend on ratios

13 13 Drivetrain Optimization Process (cont.) In order to avoid integer programming, the optimization is done in two stages:  Optimize axle and transmission ratios for maximum highway fuel economy  Optimize transmission shift points for minimum 0 to 90 acceleration time

14 14 Drivetrain Optimization Process (Cont.) Simulink Simulation Input Output Design Gear Ratio Optimization Simulink Simulation Input Output Design Transmission Shift Point Optimization Stage 1 Stage 2

15 15 Deterministic Optimization of Axle and Transmission Ratios ConstraintDescription G1=G1=(Quarter Mile Time) - 16.10 G2=G2= -(0 to 30 Time) + 2.4 G3=G3=(0 to 30 Time) - 2.5 G4=G4=(0 to 60 Time) - 7.89 G5=G5=(0 to 90 Time) -18.41 G6=G6= -(Gradeability) + 22.256 G7=G7= -(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.29 G8=G8=(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.39 G9=G9=(0 to 60 Towing Time) - 17.01 G 10 = - (Towing Gradeability) + 9.57 G 11 =(Max Engine RPM) - 6000 Trans ratios Axle ratio Fuel Economy

16 16 Deterministic Optimization of Axle and Transmission Ratios Initial PointDet. Opt Design Variables N0.48570.3645 n0.43590.5925 ngear3.72732.9956 Objective f(X) 22.186525.759 Constraints G 1 =(Quarter Mile Time) - 16.10-0.05-0.4704 G 2 = -(0 to 30 Time) + 2.4-0.05-0.06 G 3 =(0 to 30 Time) - 2.5-0.05-0.0379 G 4 =(0 to 60 Time) - 7.89-0.05-0.2 G 5 =(0 to 90 Time) -18.41-0.05-0.695 G 6 = -(Gradeability) + 22.256-0.05-0.02 G 7 = -(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.29-0.05-0.17 G 8 =(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.39-0.05-0.01 G 9 =(0 to 60 Towing Time) - 17.01-0.05-0.1327 G 10 = - (Towing Gradeability) + 9.57-0.05-0.374 G 11 =(Max Engine RPM) - 6000-876-942

17 17 Optimal Ratios vs. Production Feasible Ratios Optimal Point Production Feasible Point Design Variables N0.36450.3636 n0.59250.5970 ngear2.99563.0000 Objective f(X)25.759325.7329 Constraints G 1 =(Quarter Mile Time) - 16.10-0.4704-0.4782 G 2 = -(0 to 30 Time) + 2.4-0.06-0.0576 G 3 =(0 to 30 Time) - 2.5-0.0379-0.0424 G 4 =(0 to 60 Time) - 7.89-0.2-0.212 G 5 =(0 to 90 Time) -18.41-0.695-0.7119 G 6 = -(Gradeability) + 22.256-0.02-0.03 G 7 = -(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.29-0.17-0.1593 G 8 =(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.39-0.01-0.015 G 9 =(0 to 60 Towing Time) - 17.01-0.1327-0.1583 G 10 = - (Towing Gradeability) + 9.57-0.374-0.8 G 11 =(Max Engine RPM) - 6000-876-881

18 18 Deterministic Optimization of WOT Transmission Shift Points ConstraintDescription G1=G1=(Quarter Mile Time) - 16.10 G2=G2= -(0 to 30 Time) + 2.4 G3=G3=(0 to 60 Time) - 7.89 G4=G4= -(Gradeability) + 22.256 G5=G5=(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.39 G6=G6=(0 to 60 Towing Time) - 17.01 G7=G7= - (Towing Gradeability) + 9.57 G8=G8=(Max Engine RPM) - 6000 shift points 0 to 90 time

19 19 Deterministic Optimization of Transmission Shift Points Initial PointOptimized Point Design Variables One Two WOT Shift Speed38.547.8109 Two Three WOT Shift Speed72.581.3541 Three Four WOT Shift Speed120 One Two Trailer Shift4049.84 Two Three Trailer Shift80 Three Four Trailer Shift120 Objective f(X)18.15517.71 Constraints G 1 = (Quarter Mile Time) - 16.10 -0.05-0.097 G 2 = -(0 to 30 Time) + 2.4 -0.05 G 3 = (0 to 60 Time) - 7.89 -0.05-0.42 G 4 = -(Gradeability) + 22.256 -0.05 G 5 = (0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.39 -0.05 G 6 = (0 to 60 Towing Time) - 17.01 -0.05 G 7 = - (Towing Gradeability) + 9.57 -0.05-0.01758 G 8 = (Max Engine RPM) - 6000 -876-123

20 20 Deterministic Optimization Results

21 21 Design Under Uncertainty Analysis / Simulation Input Output Uncertainty (Quantified) Uncertainty (Calculated) 1. Quantification Propagation 2. Propagation Design 3. Design (RBDO)

22 22 Feasible Region Increased Performance x2x2 x1x1 f(x 1,x 2 ) contours g 1 (x 1,x 2 )=0 g 2 (x 1,x 2 )=0 Design Under Uncertainty (RBDO) Reliable Optimum

23 23  Viscous friction at the transmission, ring gear, and pinion gear  The engine output torque Uncertainty in Our Model  Gear ratios are ratios of integers.  Transmission shift points are not sensitive to small errors in vehicle speed and throttle position. Deterministic

24 24 Probabilistic Optimization of Axle and Transmission Ratios ConstraintDescription G1=G1=(Quarter Mile Time) - 16.10 G2=G2= -(0 to 30 Time) + 2.4 G3=G3=(0 to 30 Time) - 2.5 G4=G4=(0 to 60 Time) - 7.89 G5=G5=(0 to 90 Time) -18.41 G6=G6= -(Gradeability) + 22.256 G7=G7= -(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.29 G8=G8=(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.39 G9=G9=(0 to 60 Towing Time) - 17.01 G 10 = - (Towing Gradeability) + 9.57 G 11 =(Max Engine RPM) - 6000 Viscous friction coef. Engine torque multiplier Deterministic design variables Probabilistic design parameters

25 25 Probabilistic Optimization of Axle and Transmission Ratios Initial PointDet. OptRBDO Design Variables N 0.48570.36450.395 n 0.43590.59250.621 ngear 3.72732.99563.274 Objective f(X) 22.186525.75924.6144 Constraints G 1 =(Quarter Mile Time) - 16.10 -0.05-0.4704-0.0972 G 2 = -(0 to 30 Time) + 2.4 -0.05-0.06-0.0513 G 3 =(0 to 30 Time) - 2.5-0.05-0.0379-0.0487 G 4 =(0 to 60 Time) - 7.89 -0.05 -0.2-0.1451 G 5 =(0 to 90 Time) -18.41 -0.05 -0.695-0.0324 G 6 = -(Gradeability) + 22.256 -0.05 -0.02-1.494 G 7 = -(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.29 -0.05 -0.17-0.0651 G 8 =(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.39 -0.05 -0.01-0.0349 G 9 =(0 to 60 Towing Time) - 17.01 -0.05 -0.1327-0.1431 G 10 = - (Towing Gradeability) + 9.57 -0.05 -0.374-0.25 G 11 =(Max Engine RPM) - 6000 -876 -942-1026

26 26 Probabilistic Optimization of Transmission Shift Points ConstraintDescription G1=G1=(Quarter Mile Time) - 16.10 G2=G2= -(0 to 30 Time) + 2.4 G3=G3=(0 to 60 Time) - 7.89 G4=G4= -(Gradeability) + 22.256 G5=G5=(0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.39 G6=G6=(0 to 60 Towing Time) - 17.01 G7=G7= - (Towing Gradeability) + 9.57 G8=G8=(Max Engine RPM) - 6000

27 27 Probabilistic Optimization of Transmission Shift Points Initial PointDet. OptRBDO Design Variables One Two WOT Shift Speed 38.547.810945.42 Two Three WOT Shift Speed 72.581.354187.7814 Three Four WOT Shift Speed 120 One Two Trailer Shift 4049.8446.1091 Two Three Trailer Shift 80 THREE FOUR TRAILER SHIFT 120 Objective f(X)18.15517.7117.78 Constraints G 1 = (Quarter Mile Time) - 16.10 -0.05-0.097-0.0467 G 2 = -(0 to 30 Time) + 2.4 -0.05 G 3 = (0 to 60 Time) - 7.89 -0.05-0.42-0.396 G 4 = -(Gradeability) + 22.256 -0.05 G 5 = (0 to 30 Towing Time) + 5.39 -0.05 G 6 = (0 to 60 Towing Time) - 17.01 -0.05 G 7 = - (Towing Gradeability) + 9.57 -0.05-0.0176-0.0107 G 8 = (Max Engine RPM) - 6000 -876-52-49

28 28 Probabilistic Optimization Results

29 29 Summary & Conclusions  A vehicle drivetrain dynamic model is developed using bond graphs.  Transmission ratios, axle ratio, and WOT shift points were optimized using a two-step optimization process.  Both deterministic and probabilistic optimization was performed.  Highway fuel economy was improved by 11%  0 to 90 time was improved by 3.9%  0 to 60 time was improved by 4.5%

Download ppt "1 Zissimos P. Mourelatos, Associate Prof. Daniel N. Wehrwein, Graduate Student Mechanical Engineering Department Oakland University Modeling and Optimization."

Similar presentations

Systems Realization Laboratory How Does A Car Work? Chris Paredis G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology.

Systems Realization Laboratory How Does A Car Work? Chris Paredis G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology.
DOUG SODEN Manager, Product Planning LEXUS AUSTRALIA.

DOUG SODEN Manager, Product Planning LEXUS AUSTRALIA.
John Consiglio The Cooper Union February 24, 2009 Using Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulations to Improve EPA Emissions Testing.

John Consiglio The Cooper Union February 24, 2009 Using Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulations to Improve EPA Emissions Testing.
Manual Transmission Fundamentals

Manual Transmission Fundamentals
Vehicle Dynamics CEE 320 Steve Muench.

Vehicle Dynamics CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Learning with Purpose February 25, 2013 Learning with Purpose February 25, 2013 22.322 Mechanical Design II Spring 2013.

Learning with Purpose February 25, 2013 Learning with Purpose February 25, Mechanical Design II Spring 2013.
Division Mobile Working Machinery Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c. K.-Th. Renius c/o Institute of Automotive Engineering Prof. Dr.-Ing. B. Heißing Technische Universität.

Division Mobile Working Machinery Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c. K.-Th. Renius c/o Institute of Automotive Engineering Prof. Dr.-Ing. B. Heißing Technische Universität.
Nonlinear Applications for Automotive Engine Control By: Sajid Islam.

Nonlinear Applications for Automotive Engine Control By: Sajid Islam.
Manual Transmissions and Transaxles

Manual Transmissions and Transaxles
Slobodan Lubura. Model-Based-System Design use the models to describe the specifications, operation, performance of a component or a system of components.

Slobodan Lubura. Model-Based-System Design use the models to describe the specifications, operation, performance of a component or a system of components.
GatesGEN Patent Pending Description of the GatesGEN invention and how it works. Applications that it can be used in and more. TRANSMISSION REDUCER PLANETARY.

GatesGEN Patent Pending Description of the GatesGEN invention and how it works. Applications that it can be used in and more. TRANSMISSION REDUCER PLANETARY.
Automatic Transmission/ Transaxle Principles

Automatic Transmission/ Transaxle Principles
ME 455- Vehicle Dynamics and Control Week 10: Driveline Control Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pinar Boyraz April 2015.

ME 455- Vehicle Dynamics and Control Week 10: Driveline Control Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pinar Boyraz April 2015.
1 Reliability and Robustness in Engineering Design Zissimos P. Mourelatos, Associate Prof. Jinghong Liang, Graduate Student Mechanical Engineering Department.

1 Reliability and Robustness in Engineering Design Zissimos P. Mourelatos, Associate Prof. Jinghong Liang, Graduate Student Mechanical Engineering Department.
Team Hybrid  Daniel Farley  John Hoyt  Sean Frost Hoyt.

Team Hybrid  Daniel Farley  John Hoyt  Sean Frost Hoyt.
University of Washington Presented by Eric Yost University of Washington Electric Pontiac Fiero Project.

University of Washington Presented by Eric Yost University of Washington Electric Pontiac Fiero Project.
Performance analysis of the Impulse Shift CVT Roëll van Druten Bas Vroemen Alex Serrarens Michiel Pesgens Drivetrain Innovations BV The Netherlands www.dtinnovations.nl.

Performance analysis of the Impulse Shift CVT Roëll van Druten Bas Vroemen Alex Serrarens Michiel Pesgens Drivetrain Innovations BV The Netherlands
Resistance Forces on A Vehicle P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Estimation of Vehicle Demands ….

Resistance Forces on A Vehicle P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Estimation of Vehicle Demands ….
Power Splitting Devices Dan Farley ELM Project 11/13/2006.

Power Splitting Devices Dan Farley ELM Project 11/13/2006.
12. TRACTIVE EFFORT AND TRACTIVE RESISTANCE

12. TRACTIVE EFFORT AND TRACTIVE RESISTANCE

Similar presentations

Ads by Google