1. Smart The Grid Session 1 Draft roadmap document review: Sections 1-3 Track E - Distribution System and DER Management 10:50 AM – 12:00 PM

2. Smart The Grid Introductions Session Chair: Dr. Marty Burns, Hypertek –PhD in Chemical Engineering –10 years utility standards development and firmware –25 years home and building automation Session Co-Chair: Doug Houseman, CapGemini –Global CTO, Energy, CapGemini –35 years utility experience, 17 consulting Facilitator: Stuart McCafferty, EnerNex –Project Management Professional – 25 years experience –Modern Grid Initiative/Strategy –California Energy Commission Demand Response Analysis and Control (DRACS) reference architecture

3. Smart The Grid Session 1 – Draft Roadmap Document Review: Sections 1-3 Objective of Session: Review and comment on Sections 1-3 of the Draft Interim Roadmap document. Presentation of Topic: The Draft of Sections 1-3 are available electronically on the TWIKI site, and are included in your package collateral Questions: Capture suggested changes: –Are all issues covered that should be in these sections? –What are the missing issues? –With respect to the issues covered, what is correct/good/acceptable and what needs clarification, or modifications, or extreme makeovers? –On new issues, what is the gist of the issue? Where should it be included? –For all comments captured, what is their importance or priority? Wrap up: Main findings or questions for presentation to the larger audience

4. Smart The Grid Interim Smart Grid Roadmap Outline Objective 1 – 1 hour First Draft prepared April 22, 2009 1.Purpose and Scope 1.1 Background 1.2 Context of this Document 1.3 NIST Role and Plans 2.Smart Grid Vision 2.1 What is the Smart Grid? 2.2 Smart Grid Characteristics: Drivers and Opportunities 2.3 Smart Grid Challenges 3.Smart Grid High Level Architecture 3.1 Architecture Definition 3.2 Architecture Scope 3.3 Cyber Security Architectural Concepts 3.4 Architecture Destination and Metrics 3.5 Smart Grid Development Governance 3.6 Smart Grid Interfaces 3.7 Smart Grid Infrastructure Methods and Tools 3.8 Architectural Principles 3.9 Analysis Process Methodology Questions: 1.Are all issues covered that should be in these sections? 2.What are the missing issues? 3.With respect to the issues covered, what is correct/good/acceptable and what needs clarification, or modifications, or extreme makeovers? 4.On new issues, what is the gist of the issue? Where should it be included? 5.For all comments captured, what is their importance or priority?

5. Smart The Grid Session 2 Functions, Use Cases, and Priorities -- what's important to you Track E - Distribution System and DER Management 1:00 PM – 3:00 PM

6. Smart The Grid Introductions Session Chair: Dr. Marty Burns, Hypertek –PhD in Chemical Engineering –10 years utility standards development and firmware –25 years home and building automation Session Co-Chair: Doug Houseman, CapGemini –Global CTO, Energy, CapGemini –35 years utility experience, 17 consulting Facilitator: Stuart McCafferty, EnerNex –Project Management Professional – 25 years experience –Modern Grid Initiative/Strategy –California Energy Commission Demand Response Analysis and Control (DRACS) reference architecture

7. Smart The Grid Session 2 Functions, Use Cases, and Priorities Objective of Session: Discussion, capture, and prioritization of Distribution System and DER Management use cases (applications) – current use cases and needed use cases Presentation of Topic: Define the key applications, identify and prioritize primary use cases for each Questions: –What application areas are missing from the FERC 4? –What are the key use cases for each application area? –How do we prioritize the use cases for each application area? Wrap up: Main findings or questions for presentation to the larger audience

8. Smart The Grid FERC 4 Categories of Applications – What’s missing? Objective 1 - 30 minutes 1.Wide Area Situational Awareness 1.Phasor 2.Scada 2.Distributed Energy Resources 1.DRMS 2.Distributed Generation 1.Renewable Energy 2.Micro-Grids 3.Electric Storage 1.Tons of stuff 3.Electric Transportation 1.V2G 4.Quality of Service 1.OMS/DMS

9. Smart The Grid Breakout Teams Objective 2 – 1hour Break into teams Assign application areas to teams Identify ~5 key use cases for each application area –Title, brief description –Does the use case exist or is it a gap that needs to be filled? Prioritize use cases

10. Smart The Grid Capture Results Objective 3 – 30 minutes Each team provide results to facilitator Team lead synopsize results Open discussion of issues

11. Smart The Grid Session 3 Architecture Requirements Track E - Distribution System and DER Management 3:30 – 5:00

12. Smart The Grid Introductions Session Chair: Dr. Marty Burns, Hypertek –PhD in Chemical Engineering –10 years utility standards development and firmware –25 years home and building automation Session Co-Chair: Doug Houseman, CapGemini –Global CTO, Energy, CapGemini –35 years utility experience, 17 consulting Facilitator: Stuart McCafferty, EnerNex –Project Management Professional – 25 years experience –Modern Grid Initiative/Strategy –California Energy Commission Demand Response Analysis and Control (DRACS) reference architecture

13. Smart The Grid Session 3 Architecture Requirements Objective of Session: Identify architectural issues for distribution management and DER and new or expanded standards requirements. Presentation of Topic: Group discussion of architectural issues and new/expanded standards requirements. Questions: –What Distribution Management and DER architectural issues exist? –What are new or expanded standards requirements to meet the architectural issues? Wrap up: Main findings or questions for presentation to the larger audience

14. Smart The Grid Architectural Issues: Cross-Cutting Interfaces Objectives 1 & 2 – 1 hour Break into teams Assign Environments to teams Identify Environment issues Identify standards requirements by issue

15. Smart The Grid Capture Results Objective 3 – 30 minutes Each team provide results to facilitator Team lead synopsize results Open discussion of issues

16. Smart The Grid Session 4 Release 1 Standards - low hanging fruit Track E - Distribution System and DER Management 8:30 AM – 10:00 AM

17. Smart The Grid Introductions Session Chair: Dr. Marty Burns, Hypertek –PhD in Chemical Engineering –10 years utility standards development and firmware –25 years home and building automation Session Co-Chair: Doug Houseman, CapGemini –Global CTO, Energy, CapGemini –35 years utility experience, 17 consulting Facilitator: Stuart McCafferty, EnerNex –Project Management Professional – 25 years experience –Modern Grid Initiative/Strategy –California Energy Commission Demand Response Analysis and Control (DRACS) reference architecture

18. Smart The Grid Session 4 Release 1 Standards - low hanging fruit Objective of Session: Release 1 Standards - low hanging fruit, covering assessments, interoperability issues, and gaps Presentation of Topic: Short discussions on the key Candidate Standards with focus on those related to distribution systems Questions: –Are there any Candidate standards that have substantial agreement – no brainers? –Are there standards that are reasonably close, but may need caveats, additions, updates, constraints, or other qualifications? What are those qualifications? –Are there standards that should not be in Release 1? –Are there standards not in the Candidate list that should be? Wrap up: Main findings or questions for presentation to the larger audience

19. Smart The Grid A Continuum of Standards Objective 1 – 20 minutes – Inform Discuss the LHF concept and instructions for breakout

20. Smart The Grid LHF – What are we trying to accomplish? Goodness of fit Achieves Use Cases and Requirements needs LHF Candidate Selection Well established within our domain Established within Standards Development Organization Established User Groups Significant Implementations, Adoption and Use Likely to Meet Anticipated Greater Industry Requirements Likely to Pass Smart Grid Candidate Standards Analysis Candidate Standards Analysis Low Hanging Fruit Analysis

21. Smart The Grid Team Breakouts Objective 2 – 50 minutes –Apply smiley, frowney, and confused faces to each standard Identify issues and gaps (if applicable) –Identify missing LHF Questions to consider: Are there any Candidate standards that have substantial agreement – no brainers? Are there standards that should not be on the list? –Instructions: Use existing list and thumbs up/thumbs down/unsure icons Are there standards that are reasonably close, but may need caveats, additions, updates, constraints, or other qualifications? What are those qualifications? –Instructions: Capture details in meeting notes Are there missing standards from the Candidate list? –Instructions: Capture on screen

22. Smart The Grid Initial Candidate List Low Hanging Fruit Standards ANSI C12.19 / IEEE 1377 / MC1219 IEEE C37.118 IEC 61968/61970 (CIM) MultiSpeak IEEE 1547 BACnet – ASHRAE/ANSI 135, ISO 16484-5 IEC 61850 IEC 60870-6 TASE.2 DNP3 IEC 62351 NERC CIP 002-009 NIST Security Standards – FIPS 140-1, NIST SP800-53, NIST SP800-82, etc. IEEE 802 family IETF Internet Standards – TCP/IP, VPNs, TLS, SNMP, etc. IEC PAS 62559 UtilityAMI UtiliSec/AMI-SEC Specification UtilityAMI 2008 HAN Systems Requirements Specification HomePlug/ZigBee Alliance Smart Energy Profile

23. Smart The Grid Additional LHF Candidates

24. Smart The Grid Additional Issues Objective 3 – 20 minutes Capture Results

25. Smart The Grid Session 4 Backup Materials Track E - Distribution System and DER Management 8:30 AM – 10:00 AM

26. Smart The Grid ANSI C12.19 / IEEE 1377 / MC1219 Application: End devices, including revenue metering applications, information model Actors: End Device (including Meters), Head End, Collector, Handheld Interrogator Interfaces: Multiple media – optical, wired, and wireless Maturity: Ultra wide acceptance, has governance, has certification and testing, Category: SDO – ANSI / IEEE 1377/ MC1219 – American National Standard, IEEE Standard, Measurement Canada Standard Issues: Used primarily in North America, competes with other standards internationally, aging from an IT technological sophistication perspective.

27. Smart The Grid IEEE C37.118 Application: Phasor Measurement Unit communications Actors: Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU), Phasor Data Concentrator (PDC), Applications Interfaces: Ethernet, IP, and serial based communications Maturity: wide acceptance, has governance, no certification or testing Category: SDO - International Standard Issues: Will eventually compete with IEC 61850 subpart capable of providing same functionality

28. Smart The Grid IEC 61968/61970 Common Information Model (CIM) Application: Enterprise information representation, including transmission, distribution, back office metering Actors: Databases, software applications Interfaces: Ethernet and IP based communications, XML/SOAP Maturity: Wide acceptance in concept, has governance, has users group, however, no certification, interoperability has not been standardized, and significant testing is required Category: SDO - International (IEC) Standard Issues: Needs application specific extensions to extract maximum value, competes with NRECA MultiSpeak although harmonization effort is in progress.

29. Smart The Grid MultiSpeak, sponsored by NRECA Application: Enterprise information exchanges Actors: Utility operations and back office systems Interfaces: Ethernet and IP based communications, XSD, WSDL, SOAP Maturity: Wide acceptance and implementation by NRECA member vendors addressing the NRECA market Category: Will become an IEC standard as part of IEC 61968 Issues: Initial focus for NRECA and public power utilities, going through upgrade process to version 4, harmonization with, and merging with IEC 61968

30. Smart The Grid IEEE 1547 for DER Application: Physical and Electrical Interconnections Actors: Customers, vendors, utilities Interfaces: Point of Common Coupling (PCC) Maturity: Wide acceptance and implementation by utilities, vendors, and their customers Category: SDO - IEEE Issues: On-going work to address networked power systems, testing, and other issues

31. Smart The Grid BACnet – ASHRAE/ANSI 135, ISO 16484-5 Application: building automation Actors: Building EMS, building infrastructure devices Interfaces: Serial, Ethernet, IP – wired and wireless Maturity: Widely accepted nationally, has governance, has users group, has certification and testing Category: SDO – National (ASHRAE/ANSI) and International Standard (ISO) Issues: Supports IP through BACNet/IP in Annex J

32. Smart The Grid IEC 61850 Application: Substation Automation and Protection, Distribution Automation, Distributed Energy Resources, Hydro Generation, SCADA to field devices Actors: Protective relays, SCADA Master, DER, PQ Meters, fault recorders, applications Interfaces: Ethernet and IP based communications, with on- going work for network architecture to address environments with different network constraints Maturity: Wide acceptance, into third round of update, has governance, has users group, has certification and testing Category: SDO - International Standard Issues: competes/overlaps with DNP3 in some applications, best practice for high speed relay-to-relay communication, wide acceptance internationally, growing acceptance nationally for green field application

33. Smart The Grid IEC 60870-6 TASE.2 (ICCP) Application: Inter-Control Center Communications Actors: SCADA, EMS Interfaces: Ethernet and IP based communications, MMS Maturity: Wide acceptance and implementation Category: SDO - International (IEC) Standard Issues: Does not use object modeling, although there may be some efforts to expand to use CIM and/or IEC 61850 object.

34. Smart The Grid DNP3 Application: Substation and feeder device automation Actors: Protective relays, metering devices, cap bank controllers, switches, SCADA Master, applications Interfaces: Serial, Ethernet, IP over TCP or UDP, Maturity: Ultra wide acceptance nationally, has security built in, has governance, has users group, has certification and testing Category: De facto, Open, Industry Standard Issues: competes/overlaps with IEC 61850 in some applications, aging somewhat from an IT technological sophistication point of view, register based, no inherent semantic meaning to registers

35. Smart The Grid IEC 62351 Application: Security for protocols, network management, role-based access control Actors: Field devices, SCADA, networks Interfaces: Field networks Maturity: New standard, being implemented by field protocols Category: SDO – IEC International Standard Issues: Additional work to address some security management issues needed

36. Smart The Grid NERC CIP 002-009 Application: Security for transmission assets Actors: Transmission assets Interfaces: Field equipment, networks, enterprise systems Maturity: Released, but being revised Category: SDO – NERC Issues: Being revised/updated

37. Smart The Grid NIST Security Standards – FIPS 140-1, NIST SP800-53, NIST SP800-82, etc. Application: Security Actors: Many Interfaces: Many Maturity: Some are mature, some are still under development Category: SDO – NIST Issues: Not directly appropriate for all Smart Grid environments, although can be useful guidelines. SP800-82 does address industrial control systems, and so will be more directly applicable. Selection must be based on application requirements.

38. Smart The Grid IEEE 802 family of Standards Application: Wireless standards and wireless security Actors: Many Interfaces: Many Maturity: Depends on subpart. 802.3 (Ethernet) is ultra mature. 802.11 (WiFi) and 802.15 (Bluetooth and Zigbee) are very mature. 802.16 (WiMax) is widely accepted but early in its life and adoption cycle. 802.11i (wireless security) is widely accepted and implemented Category: SDO – IEEE Issues: Fundamental communications standard. Selection of specific subpart to implement depends on application requirements.

39. Smart The Grid IETF Internet Standards – TCP/IP, VPNs, TLS, SNMP, etc. Application: Where appropriate for public and private internets and communications Actors: Many Interfaces: Many Maturity: Very mature in most cases Category: SDO – IETF Issues: Not appropriate for all Smart Grid environments. Selection of specific standards highly dependent on application requirements – especially non-functional requirements related to bandwidth, latency, and reliability

40. Smart The Grid IEC PAS 62559 - IntelliGrid Methodology for Developing Requirements Application: Requirements development method for all energy applications Actors: Many Interfaces: Many Maturity: Pre-standard, wide acceptance by early smart grid and AMI implementing organizations Category: SDO – IEC Publicly Available Specification, Pre-Standard Issues: Special class of document produced by an SDO – a specification rather than a standard.

41. Smart The Grid HomePlug/ZigBee Alliance Smart Energy Profile Application: Home Area Network (HAN) Device Communications and Information Model Actors: Meter / HAN Gateway, HAN Device Interfaces: Multiple media – wireless and Power Line Carrier (PLC) Maturity: Initial release, has governance, has users group, has certification and testing Category: De facto, Open, Industry Consortia Specification Issues: Need to complete separation of information model from technology specifics

42. Smart The Grid UtilityAMI 2008 HAN Systems Requirements Specification Application: Home Area Network device communication, measurement, and control Actors: Energy Service Interface, HAN Devices Interfaces: Technology and GridWise Architecture Council (GWAC) layers 1-3 independent Maturity: First version, wide acceptance, has governance, no certification or testing Category: De facto, Open, Industry Consortia Requirements Specification, Issues: Planned for publication as an IEC Publicly Available Specification

43. Smart The Grid UtilityAMI UtiliSec/AMI-SEC Specification Application: AMI and Smart Grid end-to-end security Actors: All smart grid devices, components, systems, and applications Interfaces: All Maturity: First version, wide acceptance for early AMI system implementers, has governance, and no certification or testing Category: De facto, Open, Industry Requirements Specification and Framework Issues: Needs more clarity and guidelines on use. Significant, accelerated revision effort underway via ASAP-SG consortium.

44. Smart The Grid Session 5 Prioritized actions and timelines Track E - Distribution System and DER Management 10:20 AM – 12:00 PM

45. Smart The Grid Introductions Session Chair: Dr. Marty Burns, Hypertek –PhD in Chemical Engineering –10 years utility standards development and firmware –25 years home and building automation Session Co-Chair: Doug Houseman, CapGemini –Global CTO, Energy, CapGemini –35 years utility experience, 17 consulting Facilitator: Stuart McCafferty, EnerNex –Project Management Professional – 25 years experience –Modern Grid Initiative/Strategy –California Energy Commission Demand Response Analysis and Control (DRACS) reference architecture

46. Smart The Grid Session 5 Prioritized actions and timelines Presentation of Topic: From assessing the results of the previous 4 sessions, present a tentative set of actions and timelines for the issues identified Questions: –What are the Distribution System and DER issues that should be included in the list of actions? –What actions should be taken on each of these issues? –What is the proposed timeline for these actions, given the need to involve SDOs, additional Stakeholders, and the constraints of the up-coming May Workshop? Wrap up: Main findings or questions for presentation to the larger audience

47. Smart The Grid Team Discussion Objective 1 – 1 hour 20 minutes Questions: What are the Distribution System and DER issues that should be included in the list of actions? –Instructions: Capture details in meeting notes What actions should be taken on each of these issues? –Instructions: Capture details in meeting notes What is the proposed timeline for these actions, given the need to involve SDOs, additional Stakeholders, and the constraints of the up-coming May Workshop? –Instructions: Capture details in meeting notes