1. Reforms to Protect Against Conviction of the Innocent: Mistaken Eyewitness Identification Prof. Jacqueline McMurtrie April 4, 2006

2. Wrongful Convictions The Innocence Project 175 inmates released through DNA testing. Exonerations in the United States (Gross et al.) 328 exonerations from 1989 - 2003. 144 DNA and 196 non-DNA. Innocence Project Northwest 11 wrongfully convicted inmates released since 1997.

3. Factors Leading to Conviction of the Innocent Mistaken eyewitness identification. Coerced confessions. Unreliable forensic laboratory work. Police misconduct. Prosecutorial Misconduct. Ineffective representation by Counsel.

4. Number of Cases Factors Leading to Wrongful Convictions in 62 U.S. Cases Scheck, Neufeld & Dwyer, ACTUAL INNOCENCE (2000)

6. Reforms to Protect the Innocent Mistaken eyewitness identification.

7. Schemas Script – events where we expect a particular sequence of events to occur. Role – occupations, social roles, or social groups. Person – Different personality types.

8. Witnessing an Event. Click on the next slide to witness a videotaped event. You will view the event from perspective of camera. Put yourself in the shoes of the person whose arm you see opening the office door. After you view the event, immediately write down a description of what has just occurred. Describe in detail the person you observed (age, height, weight, clothing), and the person’s precise actions. Try to include as many details as possible.

10. Viewing a photomontage Imagine that you have now been brought to the police station to view a photomontage. Do you think the police have identified a suspect? The next slide is the photomontage. Do you see the suspect? Who is it?

11. 123 45 6

12. Reforms to Protect the Innocent Mistaken eyewitness identification. “Double-blind” identification procedures. Positive feedback distorts confidence and reinforces false identification.* * Bradfield, Wells & Olson, The Damaging Effect of Confirming Feedback on the Relation Between Eyewitness Certainty and Identification Accuracy, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 87, 112-120 (2002).

13. Click on the next slide to see the actual perpetrator.

14. 123 45 6

15. Reforms to Protect the Innocent Mistaken eyewitness identification. “Double-blind” identification procedures. Positive feedback distorts confidence and reinforces false identification.* Sequential, rather than simultaneous identification procedures. Relative Judgment * Bradfield, Wells & Olson, The Damaging Effect of Confirming Feedback on the Relation Between Eyewitness Certainty and Identification Accuracy, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 87, 112-120 (2002).

16. Click on the next slide to see how a sequential photomontage procedure would be administered.

18. Reforms to Protect the Innocent Mistaken eyewitness identification. “Double-blind” lineups Positive feedback distorts confidence and reinforces false identification Sequential, rather than simultaneous lineups Relative Judgment “Fillers” that Match description of perpetrator, not suspect Disclaimer Continuum of identification