Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

QUANTITATIVE APPLICATIONS OF BROADCAST MEDIA WEATHER RADAR DATA Neil I. Fox Department of Atmospheric Science University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "QUANTITATIVE APPLICATIONS OF BROADCAST MEDIA WEATHER RADAR DATA Neil I. Fox Department of Atmospheric Science University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia,"— Presentation transcript:

1 QUANTITATIVE APPLICATIONS OF BROADCAST MEDIA WEATHER RADAR DATA Neil I. Fox Department of Atmospheric Science University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, MO

2 With thanks to Mike Roberts (KRCG – TV) Mike Roberts (KRCG – TV) –Also Matt Chambers and Kelly Green Stacy Allen (Premier Marketing Group) Stacy Allen (Premier Marketing Group)

3 Content What’s the problem? What’s the problem? Why use media radars? Why use media radars? Why not use them? Why not use them? Let’s see an example! Let’s see an example!

4 US Nexrad network

5 Factors limiting the utility of the WSR-88D to detect or measure weather phenomena (Adapted from Wilson) Factors limiting the utility of the WSR-88D to detect or measure weather phenomena (Adapted from Wilson) Weather Typical max Range limiting Weather Typical max Range limiting Phenomena Range (km) Factors Supercell mesocyclone 150-230 resolution, overshoot mesocyclone 150-230 resolution, overshoot hookecho 40-160 resolution, overshoot hookecho 40-160 resolution, overshootMini-supercell miso (<4km) or miso (<4km) or mesocyclone 30-110 resolution, overshoot mesocyclone 30-110 resolution, overshoot hookecho 10- 70 resolution, overshoot hookecho 10- 70 resolution, overshoot Misocyclone 10- 70 resolution, overshoot Tornado Vortex 10-130 resolution, overshoot Signature Microburst/Macroburst 20-50 overshoot reflectivity signature 100-250 overshoot velocity signature 30-100 overshoot resolution velocity signature 30-100 overshoot resolution

6 Precipitation Estimation convective rain 100-200 overshoot, resolution stratiform Rain 75-150 overshoot, brightband resolution lake effect snow 40-100 overshoot, clutter. lake effect snow 40-100 overshoot, clutter. Winds 20-120 overshoot, Convergence Lines (warm season) 40-120 overshoot, resolution, (warm season) 40-120 overshoot, resolution, Melting level 25-70 resolution (bright band). Winter storms 40-200 overshoot

7 Range related errors in Precip estimation

8 Relative Beam heights St Louis: KLSX Fulton Pleasant Hill, KEAX

9 Not so simple Media radars usually don’t give a full volume scan, so we cannot say that information is ‘better’ (more useful) even when beam is lower. Media radars usually don’t give a full volume scan, so we cannot say that information is ‘better’ (more useful) even when beam is lower.

10 Beamwidths (resolution) St LouisFulton Pleasant Hill, KC

11 Use of broadcast radars Regular low-level PPI Regular low-level PPI Flexibility when desired Flexibility when desired –But must put broadcasters’ needs first

12 Benefits to be gained Low-level cold season precip Low-level cold season precip Low-level modification of warm season precipitation Low-level modification of warm season precipitation Low-level and small-scale (high-resolution) rotation Low-level and small-scale (high-resolution) rotation Boundaries Boundaries

13 Low-level rotation Ideally we want to observe this at more than one elevation to confirm: Ideally we want to observe this at more than one elevation to confirm: –That it’s real –That it has some vertical extent

14 Limitations Quality Control Quality Control Calibration Calibration Staffing considerations Staffing considerations Only PPI Only PPI

15 Benefit to Broadcasters Publicity Publicity Community service Community service Radar is not really used most of the time Radar is not really used most of the time

16  S-band  1  Beamwidth  250kW  25m tower

17 Example from the tornado outbreak of 4 -10 May 2003 Numerous rotations spotted (and shown on TV) using the radar, but not detected by NWS radars Numerous rotations spotted (and shown on TV) using the radar, but not detected by NWS radars Some (small) hook echo features clearly observable were not so clear with NWS radar imagery Some (small) hook echo features clearly observable were not so clear with NWS radar imagery

18 Chariton County is roughly 105 km from the radar site in Fulton and the beam height is roughly 1550 m. KEAX is 150 km: 2750 m. KLSX is 210 km away: 4300 m.

19 The Northern Audrain County Cell: From Fulton : 56 km @ 670 m From KEAX: 200km @ 4150 m From KLSX: 135 km @ 2300 m. The Boone County Cell: From Fulton: 48 km @ 550m. From KEAX: 165 km @ 3100 m. From KLSX: 160 km @ 2850 m

20 Not alone Using the radar as a supplement to NWS can provide valuable additional information Using the radar as a supplement to NWS can provide valuable additional information There’s a long way to go before we can integrate these data There’s a long way to go before we can integrate these data

21 This winter Routine data collection (inc. Level II CRAFT data) Routine data collection (inc. Level II CRAFT data) Cold season precipitation comparisons Cold season precipitation comparisons Assessment of potential benefits to local interests Assessment of potential benefits to local interests


Download ppt "QUANTITATIVE APPLICATIONS OF BROADCAST MEDIA WEATHER RADAR DATA Neil I. Fox Department of Atmospheric Science University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google