Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
X-Ray image of Crab Nebula Pulsar Credit: NASA/CXC/ASU/J. Hester et al.) Liliana Caballero With Pf. Horowitz Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Non-uniform Dense Matter and Neutrino Interactions in Supernovae Indiana University NNPSS June/13/2005
2
Outline Introduction: Supernova and Neutron Stars Introduction: Supernova and Neutron Stars Ion Response Ion Response Neutrino-Nucleus scattering Neutrino-Nucleus scattering Model Model Simulation Results Simulation Results Future Work Future Work
3
Supernova Neutrinos Collapse of a Massive Star Gravitational Force vs. Nuclear Fusion Iron Core -> energy barrier->collapse Iron Core -> energy barrier->collapse Most of the energy is lost by neutrino emission: p+e -> n+ν e Most of the energy is lost by neutrino emission: p+e -> n+ν e Density increment->Strong Force & Fermi Degeneracy->Outward Pressure Density increment->Strong Force & Fermi Degeneracy->Outward Pressure Neutron Star Neutron Star SN1987A
4
Image taken from Dany Pierre Page, Neutron Star (Theory) Group at UNAM Mass= 1.4 Sun Mass Radius=10 km
5
~10 12 g/cm 3 Medium= Plasma Electrons and Nuclei Medium= Plasma Electrons and Nuclei Neutrino Trapping in Supernova Neutrino Trapping in Supernova Neutrino-Nucleus elastic scattering Neutrino-Nucleus elastic scattering Ion, Electron Screening have important effect Ion, Electron Screening have important effect Ion Response
6
Linear Response -> Neutrino-Nucleus Elastic Cross Section: Linear Response -> Neutrino-Nucleus Elastic Cross Section: Correlation Function g(r) Correlation Function g(r) Static Structure Factor S(q) Static Structure Factor S(q) Dynamic Structure Factor S(q,w) Dynamic Structure Factor S(q,w)
7
Correlation Function g(r) Probability of finding another ion a distance r from a given ion. r
8
Static Structure Factor Charge Density Ground State
9
Model Classical Approximation Classical Approximation Ions interact via screened Coulomb potential Ions interact via screened Coulomb potential e electron screening r ij distance between Ions
10
Monte Carlo Simulation T= 1 Mev T= 1 Mev N ions N ions 56 Fe 56 Fe ρ =1x10 12 g/cm 3 ρ =1x10 12 g/cm 3 Periodic Boundary Conditions Periodic Boundary Conditions r i at equilibrium, i=1,N r i at equilibrium, i=1,N 1 2 1 2 L
11
Correlation Function N=1000 λe=10 fm L=382 fm
12
Static Structure Factor N=1000 λe=10 fm L=382 fm
13
Dynamic Response Dynamic Structure Factor
14
Molecular Dynamics Algorithm Verlet Algorithm Verlet Algorithm
15
Molecular Dynamic Simulation T= 1 MeV T= 1 MeV N ions N ions 56 Fe 56 Fe ρ =1x10 12 g/cc ρ =1x10 12 g/cc Periodic Boundary Condition Periodic Boundary Condition r i (t), i=1,N r i (t), i=1,N
16
Dynamic Structure Factor N=500 λe=10 fm L=304 fm
17
q (fm-1) *10 -4 (fm-1) Ω p *10 -4 (fm-1) q 0 =2π/L 3.34.2 q 0 * 2 1/2 4.55.7 q 0 *3 1/2 5.16.9 q 0 *4 1/2 67.8Peaks
18
Future Work Ion-Ion Screening model break down at large density Ion-Ion Screening model break down at large density N=100000 nucleons MDGRAPE N=100000 nucleons MDGRAPE Dynamical Response Pasta Dynamical Response Pasta
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.