Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Common-Base vs. Common-Emitter

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Common-Base vs. Common-Emitter"— Presentation transcript:

1 Common-Base vs. Common-Emitter
Identical quiescent conditions Identical voltage gain (except C-E inverts) Identical output resistance Common-Base input impedance is very low Common-Emitter suffers Miller effect

2 Cascode Configuration
Common-Emitter Amp High Rin, Low Gain Common-Base Amp Low Rin, High Gain

3 Cascode Quiescent Conditions
VB1 VB2 VB1-0.5 VB2-0.5 (VB1-0.5+VS)/RE Note, IC1 = IC2

4 Cascode (I) Common-Base Stage
From common-emitter input stage

5 Cascode (II) Common-Emitter Stage
To common-base stage, rin = re

6 Upper Cut-Off Frequency
Cascode configuration Common-emitter amplifier

7 Practical Cascode Configuration
To keep Q1 and Q2 out of saturation: To ensure this, biasing networks for Q1 and Q2 are often combined.

8 Analysis Example Quiescent conditions
Assume base currents are negligible.

9 -5.5 V +4.5 V +8.6 V +5 V IC = 0.8 mA -5 V

10 Voltage Gain : +8.6 V +5 V +4.5 V -5 V -5.5 V IC = 0.8 mA

11 Cut-off frequencies Lower: Upper: -5 V +8.6 V +5 V +4.5 V -5.5 V
IC = 0.8 mA

12 Measured Response

13 Summary – RF Design Upper cut-off frequency of a common-emitter amplifier is set mostly by CBC due to the Miller effect. Increase bandwidth by: Reducing gain Reducing RS Reducing CBC (different transistor) Suppressing Miller effect – Cascode configuration


Download ppt "Common-Base vs. Common-Emitter"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google