1. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 1 Slides for the US Si Tracker Institutional Group Leaders Meeting J. Incandela March 1, 2005

2. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 2 US CMS Tracker Group Brown University R. Hooper, G. Landsberg, C. Nguyen, H. Nguyen University of California, Riverside (UCR) P. Gartung, G. Hanson, G.Y. Jeng, G. Pasztor University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) A. Affolder, S. Burke, C. Campagnari, F. Garberson, D. Hale, J. Incandela, P. Kalavase, S. Kyre, J. Lamb, R. Taylor, D. Stuart, D. White + technicians University of Illinois, Chicago (UIC) E. Chabalina, C. Gerber, L. Nigra, T. Ten Fermilab (FNAL) M. Demarteau, A. Ronzhin, K. Sogut, L. Spiegel, S. Tkaczyk + technicians University of Kansas (KU) P. Baringer, A. Bean, L. Christofek, D. Coppage Mexican Consortium: Cinvestav: H. Castilla, R. Perez, A. Sanchez Puebla: E. Medel, H. Salazar San Luis Potosi: A. Morelos University of Rochester (UR) R.Demina, R. Eusebi, E. Halkiadakis, A. Hocker, S. Korjenevski, P. Tipton 20 joined group this past year – few more needed at both sites 10 left the group (includes KSU) 20 joined group this past year – few more needed at both sites 10 left the group (includes KSU)

3. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 3 US Group Activity US Group Leaders Meeting – monthly or as needed Discuss resources, planning, etc. US Production Meeting – Weekly Keep track of quality, schedule, problems All major tasks report. Experts understood to be meeting regularly. One expert representative for each task will make summary report in the Production meeting. Will start next week.

4. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 4 SST Schedule Completion: Jan. 2006 An aggressive schedule

5. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 5 Schedule Outlook Parts Sensor: HPK – yields very high – quality excellent Fairly confident all Sensors will arrive by November – even if we increase order from 16400 to ~18000 Hybrids: Cicorel – quality good – yields rising Recent batches were very good Went from slightly behind the original schedule to slightly ahead The exceptionally good new batches included TOB Looks like all TOB hybrids could be in hand before Europe closes for August Module Production Open issues: Approval of Ag epoxy fix, Encapsulation Start now: 6-9 per day (30 per site this week) Following 4 weeks: ~50/w/site Following 4 weeks: ~75/w/site Steady state after that: ~100/w/site Cannot exceed ~ 60-70/w/site until multi-rod burn-in is going. Without rods, need overnight cycling in Wien box for thermal check. Gives us 5 to 8 weeks to get the rod production up to snuff.

6. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 6 Planning We will focus heavily on TOB initially, with the possibility of completing all rods by early Autumn being considered. Then, UCSB will be full time TEC module production. Meanwhile, we build a team up at CERN for I&C

7. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 7 UCSB Assembly Plate/Capacity  Total of 24 plates (#) = plates added in 2004 Module type Completed Plates Plates In Process Total Daily Capacity (# modules) TOB r-phi7 (2)721 TOB stereo3 (1)39 TEC R5P2 (2)139 TEC R5S2 (2)139 TEC R65 (4)515 TEC R72 (2)139

8. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 8 TEC R7 TEC R6 TEC R5P TEC R5S TOB r-phiTOB stereo Module Types Built in US

9. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 9 Tracker Management Structure Proposed Solution to Management Structure Must involve all Talented People in the Success of the Project Propose to Manage the Project with a Management Board Each Member with assigned Specific Responsibility Propose the Management Board meets ~ once each Month Management Board meets at different Tracker Institutions : Visit labs, Meets people doing the work, understands Problems/Common Solutions Receive Reports, Technical Status, Financial Status, Anticipate Future Problems Manage the Project to meet Schedule and Budget Develop the CMS Tracker Management Team Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation

10. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 10 Tracker Management Structure Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation

11. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 11 Tracker Management Structure Proposed Project Structure Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation

12. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 12 Tracker Management Structure Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation

13. US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 13 Management Tracker Construction Board Currently 2D Columns: TIB/TOB/TEC/PIXELS Rows: Module Production, Integration: Tracker/Electronics/Software May add more technical rows Names not settled