1. Students: Shalev Dabran Eran Papir Supervisor: Mony Orbach In association with: Spring 2005 High Speed Digital Systems Lab

2. Project Goals Developing a 16bit CRC-GENRATOR for the Rocket I/O experiment using to the Virtex II-pro PPC To PC Packet Generation Patterns PLB Test Status Storage Traffic Generator Traffic Analyzer Rocket I/O Transceiver BRAM 1 BRAM 2 CRC Generator CRC Analyzer

3. Properties Data rate – up to 2.5 Gbits /sec. Data width - 32 bits / cycle. Data length is unlimited.

4. What is CRC?  When we transmit message we want to be sure that the message that was received in the destination is the same one that we sent.  We add to the transmitted message an overhead data for checking it on the received side.  The overhead data called CRC - Cyclic Redundancy Checking.  CRC are used for error detection in communication systems.

5. Requirements On the transmitted side:  We get double word stream of data with start_of_data packet and end_of_data packet.  We add a CRC word to the end_of_data packet. On the received side:  Compare the calculated CRC & the received CRC.  Output an error signal if error detected

6. 8 bit CRC

7. 8 bit CRC solution to 32 bit data DATA D31 D30 D0 … ………………………… D31 CRC=D0 + + D31

8. Transmitter Integration Rocket I/O Transceiver CRC Generator Traffic Generator DATA Control DATA+ CRC Control Data

9. Receiver Integration Rocket I/O Transceiver CRC Analyzer Traffic Analyzer DATA Control DATA+ CRC Control Data

10. Tests  CRC test – by known vector.  Changing Polynomial.  Integrating in the complete system.  Bypass test.  Error injection.

11. Changing Polynomials  The matrix is written in the internal ram  We can change it by write a new values to the ram with out the need of VHDL code changes.

12. VHDL Implementation

13. Test Bench

14. Transmitter Side

15. Handling the two CRC’s  We use a XOR function to compare the two CRC’s (received and calculated).  If the data that was sent and the data that was received are identical the CRC’s are the same and there will be no error. –XOR  :  ‘1’  ’1’ and ‘0’  ’0’ = ‘0’  ‘0’  ’1’ and ‘1’  ’0’ = ‘1’

16. Receiver Side

17. Error Inject

18. Our CRC Vs. Web CRC  Our is flexible, the web’s constant  Our pipeline is better (one gate between latches).  Our area is much Bigger.  We use around 5000 latches the web can be uses around 200.(Transmiter and Receiver)  Main different is the latches, area & timing

19. Summary  Our part in this project was to add 16 bit changeable parallel CRC to both the Transmitter part and the receiver part.  We check the differences between a serial and a parallel implementation and decided to go with a specific implementation that we can use to simply modify the polynomial that is being used.  CRC block features: –Can be bypassed using a bypass signal. –Can be intentionally inserted error using the error inject signal. –Can used different polynomials by changing the chip internal memory without changing the VHDL code.  After the implementation of the CRC block we used a Test Bench to test out block and then integrated our CRC block with the rest of the system.

20. Conclusions  Because we used a CRC that can get any polynomial and didn't use a specific code for a specific polynomial, we needed a general purpose logic design and this design uses a lot of logic cells on the chip.  Being a part of a big project gave us all the project definitions that led us in a specific direction but didn't give us a lot of room to maneuver.  In this project we learned about VHDL implementations and the usage of the Virtex2 pro chip.

21. THE END