Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

HCl, V, v´=14, vs J´, power and operator(!), Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp Agust,www,...rempi/hcl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "HCl, V, v´=14, vs J´, power and operator(!), Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp Agust,www,...rempi/hcl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass."— Presentation transcript:

1 HCl, V, v´=14, vs J´, power and operator(!), Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp Agust,www,...rempi/hcl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007km.ppt Comparison of VHW andf KM data comparison of independent collected data Power dependence effects J ´ dependence effects - relevant to relative mass intensities

2 From KM:

3 J´=7 J´=6 J´=5 35Cl+ Ca. Normalized to H35Cl+

4 H+ No clear trend J´=6 J´=7 J´=0

5 Comment: I(35Cl+)/I(H35Cl+) increases for J´>4, i.e as J´=5 <J´=6<J´=7 whereas I(H+)/I(H35Cl+) is approximatelly constant It is pitty that J´= 8 was not recorded The following experiment was a test for the relative peak intensities for J´=7:

6 From: Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp i.e.km data From: Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass Vstate Q7-02007km.pxp Suggests that the focus point is not on the beam(?)

7 Comment: -Hence it looks as if the I(35Cl+) / I(H35Cl+) -ratio is reproducable Now lets compare these results with those from Wang, i.e.

8 35Cl+ H35Cl+ Agust,heima,..../REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HCl VQ7,8,PvsI-210907vhwak.pxp i.e. From VHW, J´=7 KM: From: Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass Vstate Q7-02007km.pxp J´=7 VHW

9 From: Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp i.e.km data Agust,heima,..../REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HCl VQ7,8,PvsI-210907vhwak.pxp i.e. From VHW, J´=7 J´=7 KM VHW

10 Comment: slides 7 & 8 => VHW and KM compare nicely about the relative structure/intensities for J´=7 (V, v´=14) What about J´=8? Look at agust,heima,......HCl,agust07-/HCl VQ7,8,PvsI-250907vhw.pxp VHW did perform three independent measurements on J´=8: 1)Two 210907 (showing peak on high mass side) and 2)One 250907 (showing no peak on high mass side) 3)They “roughly” look the same, hence I decided to look at the one from 250907:

11 J´=8 Normalized: H35Cl+ 35Cl+ Power dependence:

12 H+ 0 window 5 windows

13 From: Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp i.e.km data.agust,heima,......HCl,agust07-/HCl VQ7,8,PvsI-250907vhw.pxp J´=7 J´=8 VHW KM

14 Comment: 1)J´=8 very little power dependence of relative intensities: possibly slight change in I(H+)/I(H35Cl+) and I(35C+)/I(H35Cl+) (?) 2)I(35Cl+) / I(H35Cl+) almost the same for J´=7 and 8.


Download ppt "HCl, V, v´=14, vs J´, power and operator(!), Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp Agust,www,...rempi/hcl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google