Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Economics of Climate Change: An Economic Critique of Kyoto, and an Alternative Proposal Dr. Arne Kildegaard University of Minnesota, Morris.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Economics of Climate Change: An Economic Critique of Kyoto, and an Alternative Proposal Dr. Arne Kildegaard University of Minnesota, Morris."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Economics of Climate Change: An Economic Critique of Kyoto, and an Alternative Proposal Dr. Arne Kildegaard University of Minnesota, Morris

2 Directions to Morris…

3 Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) and the atmosphere

4 CO2 Emissions and Concentrations

5 CO2 Emissions

6 CO2 Concentrations and Temperature

7 Temperature Change

8

9

10 The Industrial Revolution: A Revolution in Energy Usage BeforeAfter

11 Revolution in Energy Use (cont’d.) Exploitation of carbon-based fossil fuels Exploitation of carbon-based fossil fuels Consequent CO2 emissions Consequent CO2 emissions Deforestation (elimination of carbon sinks) Deforestation (elimination of carbon sinks) Consequent elimination of carbon sinks Consequent elimination of carbon sinks  Inevitably, higher atmospheric concentrations

12 Other GHGs Methane Methane Nitrous Oxide Nitrous Oxide Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) Perflourocarbons (PFCs) Perflourocarbons (PFCs) Sulphur hexaflouride Sulphur hexaflouride

13 Consequences: a non-exhaustive list (from the UNIPCC) Rising sea levels Rising sea levels Island nations and coastal cities Island nations and coastal cities Freshwater resources (desertification) Freshwater resources (desertification) Human health Human health Vector-borne diseases (e.g. malaria) Vector-borne diseases (e.g. malaria) Agriculture Agriculture Cereal production to fall 20% by some GE analyses Cereal production to fall 20% by some GE analyses Redistribution from tropics to temperate zones Redistribution from tropics to temperate zones Species and habitat Species and habitat

14 Can’t we all just get along…?

15 UN Framework Convention on Climate Control (UNCCC) Rio Conference Rio Conference COPs (Council of Parties) Rounds COPs (Council of Parties) Rounds “Targets and Timetables” (COP1) “Targets and Timetables” (COP1) Kyoto Protocol (COP3, December, 1997) Kyoto Protocol (COP3, December, 1997) Subsequent modifications (COP4-10) Subsequent modifications (COP4-10) U.S. Repudiation (March, 2001) U.S. Repudiation (March, 2001)

16 Key Features of Kyoto, as Amended Targets and Timetables Targets and Timetables  93% of 1990 emissions by 2008-2012  93% of 1990 emissions by 2008-2012 Binding restrictions on “Annex” B countries only Binding restrictions on “Annex” B countries only 38 countries + EU 38 countries + EU Tradeable Discharge Permits (TDP) Scheme Tradeable Discharge Permits (TDP) Scheme To minimize total cost of compliance To minimize total cost of compliance Treaty Enters into force when countries comprising 55% of Annex B emissions ratify Treaty Enters into force when countries comprising 55% of Annex B emissions ratify

17 Problems with Kyoto Economic rationality? Economic rationality? Initial Emissions $ Abatement Marginal Damage Cost Marginal Abatement Cost E* Emissions

18 Problems with Kyoto, cont’d. Financial Transfers and political sustainability Financial Transfers and political sustainability Wilcoxen & McKibben estimate U.S. permit purchases @ $27-$54 billion Wilcoxen & McKibben estimate U.S. permit purchases @ $27-$54 billion Financial Tranfers and economic instability Financial Tranfers and economic instability Dutch Disease Dutch Disease

19 Problems with Kyoto, cont’d. Who will monitor compliance? Who will monitor compliance? Governments must bear the domestic economic and political costs of monitoring, while whatever benefit is shared internationally. Governments must bear the domestic economic and political costs of monitoring, while whatever benefit is shared internationally.

20 Problems with Kyoto, cont’d. Which regulatory instrument? It matters… TDPs vs. “Green Taxes” Initial Emissions $ Abatement Marginal Abatement Cost # Permits Emissions

21 Problems with Kyoto, cont’d. Which regulatory instrument? It matters… TDPs vs. “Green Taxes” Initial Emissions $ Abatement Marginal Abatement Cost Unit emisions tax rate Emissions

22 TDPs under uncertainty regarding abatement costs (MAC steeper than MDC) MAC (perceived) MAC (actual) Deadweight Loss Emissions Permits

23 Green taxes under uncertainty regarding abatement costs (MAC steeper than MDC) MAC (perceived) MAC (actual) Deadweight Loss Emissions Permits MDC Tax rate

24 Choice of Instruments Under Uncertainty When MDC “steeper” than MAC When MDC “steeper” than MAC  TDPs dominate tax schemes When MAC “steeper” than MDC When MAC “steeper” than MDC  Taxes dominate TDP schemes But: “free permits” are politically much more attractive than taxed emissions

25 Choice of Instrument: A Hybrid Approach At the margin, a tax is better At the margin, a tax is better Why not grant permits for the first n units of emissions, and sell permits at a fixed price thereafter? Why not grant permits for the first n units of emissions, and sell permits at a fixed price thereafter?

26 Choice of Instruments: A Hybrid Approach MAC (perceived) MAC (actual) Emissions MDC Tax rate Cost of Compliance

27 Choice of Instruments: A Hybrid Approach MAC (perceived) MAC (actual) MDC Tax rate Permits granted Cost of compliance

28 Hybrid Approach: Advantages Appropriate instrument, given uncertainties of cost and relative slopes Appropriate instrument, given uncertainties of cost and relative slopes Avoids financial transfers between countries Avoids financial transfers between countries Appropriate incentives to monitor Appropriate incentives to monitor Tax revenues for government Tax revenues for government Firms police each other Firms police each other Flexible Flexible As more scientific information becomes available, countries can change tax level appropriately As more scientific information becomes available, countries can change tax level appropriately

29 References McKibben and Wilcoxen (2002): “The Role of Economics in Climate Change,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, V.16, No.2, Spring. McKibben and Wilcoxen (2002): “The Role of Economics in Climate Change,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, V.16, No.2, Spring. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat (2003): “Caring for Climate: A Guide to the Climate Change Convention and the Kyoto Protocol.” United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat (2003): “Caring for Climate: A Guide to the Climate Change Convention and the Kyoto Protocol.”

30 Discussion…?


Download ppt "The Economics of Climate Change: An Economic Critique of Kyoto, and an Alternative Proposal Dr. Arne Kildegaard University of Minnesota, Morris."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google