Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 1 Technical Infrastructure and PolicyFramework for Maximising the Benefits from Research Output Keith G Jeffery Science and Technology Facilities Council Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, OX11 0QX UK e-mail: keith.g.jeffery@rl.ac.uk
2
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 2 Structure 1. Introduction 2. Maximising Benefits from Research Output 3. Technical Infrastructure 4. Policy Framework 5. The Way Forward 6. Conclusion
3
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 3 2006- Director, IT & Internatio nal Strategy 1999- 2006 Director IT & Head BITD (IT, library, photorepro; > 1000 servers, 360000 users)
4
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 4 18 European countries - major labs or consortia of universities 12000 ICT researchers Working groups Fellows programme Cor Baayen Award Strategy documents for EC and national governments R&D projects, networks of excellence etc > 100 spin-out companies European Office(s) of W3C ERCIM News www.ercim.org ERCIM European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics
5
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 5 Linking together systems in each country managing research information –Funders of research –Organisations performing research For –Strategic decision-making about what research to fund /do –Finding research partners and competitors –Finding innovative ideas for technology transfer / exploitation –Informing the media / public CERIF: EU recommendation to member states www.eurocris.org
6
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 6 Structure 1. Introduction 2. Maximising Benefits from Research Output 3. Technical Infrastructure 4. Policy Framework 5. The Way Forward 6. Conclusion
7
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 7 Requirement Actors Researcher Research Manager Funding Agency Policymaker Innovator Educator Student Media Roles Review existing material ideas, techniques Evaluation researcher, organisation Search for innovative ideas Discover teaching material Input to ‘stories’ for public interest, ethics
8
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 8 Requirement User: Fast Easy Homogeneous Sharing Legal Cost-effective middleware application Technical: GRIDs Formalised metadata Canonical syntax/semantics
9
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 9 Benefits Faster research turnround – more progress Originator improved quality – access & review Community improved quality – access & review Improved innovation Improved education Improved public engagement Improved PR for institution => wealth creation / quality of life improvement
10
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 10 Scenario middleware application CRIS project, person, organisational unit, research output (products, patents, publications), funding, facilities, equipment, events…… e-Research repository research datasets, software e-Research control experiments, take data, visualistaion, in-silico experiments (simulation) e-Process Workflows, research applications, travel requests, claims Not only work with the e-literature repository but also…..
11
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 11 Scenario middleware application CRIS project, person, organisational unit, research output (products, patents, publications), funding, facilities, equipment, events…… e-Research repository research datasets, software e-Research control experiments, take data, visualistaion, in-silico experiments (simulation) e-Process Workflows, research applications, travel requests, claims Not only work with the e-literature repository but also…..
12
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 12 Structure 1. Introduction 2. Maximising Benefits from Research Output 3. Technical Infrastructure 4. Policy Framework 5. The Way Forward 6. Conclusion
13
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 13 Technical Infrastructure e-infrastructure CRIS Repositories Metadata & Curation Integration
14
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 14 The GRIDs Architecture Knowledge Layer Information LayerComputation / Data Layer Data to Knowledge Control
15
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 15 A POSSIBLE ARCHITECTURE U:USER S:SOURCE R:RESOURCE Rm:Resource Metadata Ra:Resource Agent Ua:User Agent Um:User Metadata Sm:Source Metadata Sa:Source Agent brokers The GRIDs Environment
16
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 16 NGG1 Requirements Transparent and reliable Open to wide user and provider communities Pervasive and ubiquitous Secure and provide trust across multiple administrative domains Easy to use and to program Persistent Based on standards for software and protocols Person-centric Scalable Easy to configure and manage
17
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 17 NGG2 NGG1 left some undefined research areas Call2 projects did not address all areas of research opportunity NGG2 convened to update the vision: –Particularly security / trust –Particularly self-* properties –Particularly semantic description of components Report September 2004
18
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 18 Application AApplication BApplication C Grids Middleware Services Needed for A Grids Middleware Services Needed for B Grids Middleware Services Needed for C Grids Foundations for Operating System X Grids Foundations For Operating System Y Operating System X Operating System Y Grids Operating System (including Foundations) Modular and dynamically loadable NGG2 Architecture
19
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 19 NGG2 Problems Layering architecture complex; need more flexibility Require functional software components - easy, fast development - re-use
20
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 20 NGG3: SOKU Interfaces Computing Infrastructure Services Non SOKU
21
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 21 SOKU Descriptive metadata Restrictive metadata Functional program code Descriptive metadata Restrictive metadata Functional program code Descriptive metadata Restrictive metadata Descriptive metadata Restrictive metadata Functional program code Descriptive metadata Restrictive metadata Functional program code Descriptive metadata Restrictive metadata Functional program code Descriptive metadata Restrictive metadata Functional program code Composed SOKU SOKU
22
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 22 Technical Infrastructure e-infrastructure CRIS Repositories Metadata & Curation Integration
23
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 23 The R&D Process Workprogramme Proposal Project Results Exploitation WealthCreation Note: some CRIS developers limit recording of outputs from the process to areas indicated Nirvana
24
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 24 PROJECT ORGUNIT Skills CV General Facility Particular Equipment Contact Results Publication Results Patent Results Product Service Funding Programme Event Classification Prize/Award PERSON CERIF: EU Recommendation to Member States
25
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 25 PROJECT ORGUNIT PERSON Result_Publication Can Express: (where DT-date/time) Person A (DT1 - DT2) (is author of) Publication X Orgunit O (DT1 - DT2) (is owner of IPR in) Publication X Person A (DT1 - DT2) (is employee of ) Orgunit O Person A (DT1 - DT2) (is project leader of) Project P Person A (DT1-DT2) (is member of) Orgunit M Person A (DT1-DT2) (is member of) Orgunit N Orgunit M (DT1-DT2) (is part of) Orgunit O Orgunit N (DT1-DT2) (is part of) Orgunit O Secondary Base Entities: example: RESULT_PUBLICATION
26
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 26 Result_Publication Instance Diagram Person A Publication X OrgUnit O OrgUnit M OrgUnit N Project P member employee Part of owns IPR author Project leader
27
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 27 Result_Publication Instance Diagram Person A Publication X OrgUnit O OrgUnit M OrgUnit N Project P member employee Part of owns IPR author Project leader repository HR System webpages Project Management Finance CERIF encourages interfacing to external systems
28
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 28 Technical Infrastructure e-infrastructure CRIS Repositories Metadata & Curation Integration
29
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 29 Repositories Document / article repositories - simple metadata (discovery, description) - ePrints, DSpace, Fedora, ePubs…. e-Research repositories - more complex metadata (discovery, description, usage control, software parameters…) - ‘homebrew’ systems – portals to research datasets and software
30
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 30 Technical Infrastructure E-infrastructure CRIS Repositories Metadata & Curation Integration
31
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 31 Classification of Metadata data (document) SCHEMANAVIGATIONALASSOCIATIVE how to get it constrain it view to users
32
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 32 Classification of Metadata data (document) SCHEMANAVIGATIONALASSOCIATIVE how to get it constrain it view to users Metadata must have formal syntax and semantics to be machine- understandable as well as machine- readable
33
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 33 Dublin Core Simple DC elements, some syntax, no semantics Qualified DC better syntax, namespaces More Recent proposals (2007) abstract data model, RDF
34
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 34 DC Problems In parallel (1999-present) criticism of DC: 1.Syntax and semantics not sufficiently formal 2.,, are ROLES of person or organisational unit not base entities 3. : extremely general 4. : is a variant of a role-based relationship object<>object 5. recently separated into geographic and temporal but needs formalisation Formalised version of DC proposed, considered, now in CERIF Note: recent (2007) work on DC and SWAP (JISC) going in this direction
35
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 35 Publications UniqueId Subject Keywords Description Resource Type Coverage Temporal Coverage Spatial Title PersonOrgUnit Security Privacy AccessLevel Charge Annotation Classification Domain of CERIF Restrictive Quality Assessment Project ResourceIdentifier Descriptive Navigational
36
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 36 But the problem with metadata is It takes too much effort for the researcher to put it in (many web-form-screens) So have to input incrementally, no repetition, using the workflow.. And not re-keying data stored already elsewhere in other (linked-up) systems
37
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 37 Progressive Recording Grey Document Grey doc Publication metadata Person Project OrgUnit new
38
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 38 Progressive Recording White document Grey doc Publication metadata Person Project OrgUnit White doc Publication metadata new
39
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 39 Curation Problem fast changing media – need media conversion digital fading – need for refresh metadata to understand later Answer OAIS : but provides only an architecture: no interoperation metadata
40
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 40 Technical Infrastructure e-infrastructure CRIS Repositories Metadata & Curation Integration
41
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 41 CRIS + Repositories at 1 institution CRIS Research Context [projects, persons, organisational units funding, products, patents, publications facilities, equipment, events] OA Repository (hypermedia) Documents e-Research repository Datasets and Software OAI- PMH Various protocols End-User CERIF
42
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 42 ….and multiple institutions CRIS OA repository e-Research repository CRIS OA repository e-Research repository CRIS OA repository e-Research repository End-User Institution AInstitution BInstitution C
43
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 43 CERIF-CRIS at the Centre Portal with knowledge-assisted user interface Digital Curation Facility SCIENTIFIC DATASETS Data Information Knowledge PUBLICATIONS Data Information Knowledge metadata publish validate GRIDs Ambient, Pervasive Access
44
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 44 CERIF-CRIS : Enhancing and Enabling CRIS Finance Human Resources Project Management Publications Patents Products
45
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 45 Structure 1. Introduction 2. Maximising Benefits from Research Output 3. Technical Infrastructure 4. Policy Framework 5. The Way Forward 6. Conclusion
46
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 46 Policy OA Benefits Ethics: public access to publicly funded research Research Impact: greater access and use Costs and economic benefit: reduced costs and clear benefits to economy of open access Metrics: easier to get real metrics of usage Added value: link OA repositories to CRIS etc Just reward: overcomes publishers profiting from scholarly work provided free
47
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 47 Policy Barriers to OA Loss of publisher income: publishers fear catastrophic cancellations of subscriptions Copyright: transfer author publisher so cannot re-use (in fact mostly can) Access Difficulties: DC metadata insufficient Completeness: 8-15% fill: need mandates and better workflowed input/update systems
48
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 48 Policy Many OA declarations (Budapest onwards) Increasing use of green institutional OA repositories – publisher permissions (embargoes) Publishers offering OA – but author/institution pays (gold) Note: for highly productive institutions gold costs more than subscription models
49
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 49 Mandates Progressively more mandates – institutional and funding organisations The preferred, optimal and recommended procedure is : immediately upon acceptance for publication the metadata and full article are deposited in an institutional repository. If the publisher does not demand an embargo period both are set to open access; if an embargo period is demanded then only the metadata is made visible until the end of the embargo period. Of course, associated with the metadata record there can be (and ePrints provides) a ‘request button’ so that the material can be sent automatically to any researcher who requests it under the usual ‘fair use’ conditions.
50
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 50 Integration Need all funding organisations to mandate OA in institutional repositories Resistance from publishers (including learned societies as publishers) Engage with them to find new business models
51
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 51 Structure 1. Introduction 2. Maximising Benefits from Research Output 3. Technical Infrastructure 4. Policy Framework 5. The Way Forward 6. Conclusion
52
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 52 Way Forward We cannot allow progress to be delayed by particular commercial interests Their commercial interests are not above the public need for improved wealth creation and quality of life
53
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 53 Speculation Author deposits in green OA IR Push technology informs learned society Referees access and record reviews Learned society places ‘kitemark ’ Or anyone can referee and record review? Note: JISC OJIMS (Overlay Journal Infrastructure for Meterological Sciences) exploring this space from March 2007
54
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 54 Structure 1. Introduction 2. Maximising Benefits from Research Output 3. Technical Infrastructure 4. Policy Framework 5. The Way Forward 6. Conclusion
55
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 55 Take-home message Despite protests and obstacles to improved access to research material over the centuries from religious, commercial, professional or labour groups, none delayed for long progress to meet the requirement as defined by the research community. Electronic publishing must take its place in the modern world of integrated e-infrastructure, research output, CRIS. All within the new e-research environment
56
©STFC/Keith G JefferyELPUB 2007 Keynote 20070427 56 Prof. Keith G Jeffery CEng, CITP, FBCS, FGS, HFICS Director, IT & International Strategy Science and Technology Facilities Council Rutherford Appleton Laboratory k.g.jeffery@rl.ac.uk
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.