Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Plant breeding and plant genetics: Biotechnology past, present and future Alan McHughen, DPhil. Univ. of California Riverside, Ca. 92521

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Plant breeding and plant genetics: Biotechnology past, present and future Alan McHughen, DPhil. Univ. of California Riverside, Ca. 92521"— Presentation transcript:

1 Plant breeding and plant genetics: Biotechnology past, present and future Alan McHughen, DPhil. Univ. of California Riverside, Ca. 92521 USAalanmc@citrus.ucr.edu

2 Plant breeding history 10,000 years of human agriculture 10,000 years of human agriculture Selection Selection Introduction Introduction Crossing, wide crosses Crossing, wide crosses Spontaneous mutation Spontaneous mutation Induced mutation Induced mutation Now, all plants are genetically modified from their ancestral progenitors.

3 Environmental damage caused by: SourceExample of problemPrior regulatory scrutiny Entire Genotypes Naturally occurring invasionsOrdinary Successionsnone Unintentional introductions Russian thistle in NAnone ? Intentional introduction; Purple loosestrife; Eurasion milfoil low/none Intentional introductions, Prickly Pear cactus in Australia low Unintended displacements Johnsongrass in NA Intentional introductions, Intentional displacements Soybean in NA low Single Genes Intentional introductions, Rht genes in wheat low/moderate intentional displacements: Canola from rapeseedmoderate GMOsNone recordedhigh

4 Significant numbers Number of field trials of GMOs > 10,000 Number of countries conducting trials23 Number of GM plant species tested41 Number of hectares of GM crops, year 2002> 50 M Number of significant adverse safety incidents0

5 Biotechnology’s four concepts: Number 1: All organisms are made of cells and cell products All organisms are made of cells and cell products

6 Biotechnology’s four concepts Number 2: All organisms are made of cells and cell products All organisms are made of cells and cell products Each cell in an organism contains the same set of genes Each cell in an organism contains the same set of genes

7 Biotechnology’s four concepts Number 3: All organisms are made of cells and cell products All organisms are made of cells and cell products Each cell in an organism contains the same set of genes Each cell in an organism contains the same set of genes The genome contains all the genetic information necessary to make an entire organism The genome contains all the genetic information necessary to make an entire organism

8 Biotechnology’s four concepts Number 4: All organisms are made of cells and cell products All organisms are made of cells and cell products Each cell in an organism contains the same set of genes Each cell in an organism contains the same set of genes The genome contains all the genetic information necessary to make an entire organism The genome contains all the genetic information necessary to make an entire organism All organisms share the same All organisms share the same genetic language

9

10

11 Variety release requirements: Conventional Agronomic performance Agronomic performance Proximate analysis Proximate analysis Antinutritive factors Antinutritive factors

12

13 Variety release requirements: Transgenic Agronomic performance Agronomic performance Proximate analysis Proximate analysis Antinutritive factors Antinutritive factors Plus: Plus:

14 Plus: Molecular characterization of inserted DNA, Southern and restriction analyses PCR for several fragments, Various enzyme assays (ALS, NOS, NPT-II) Copy number of inserts Size of each fragment, Source of each fragment Utility of each fragment How fragments were recombined How construct was delivered into flax Biological activity of inserted DNA (genes) Quantitative analyses of novel proteins (western analyses) Temporal activity of inserted genes spatial activity of inserted genes complete amino acid analysis detailed amino acid analysis for valine, leucine and isoleucine Toxicity (feeding trials were not warranted) Allergenicity (feeding trials were not warranted) Biological analysis: Pathogenicity to other organisms dormancy, outcrossing potential for horizontal gene transfer seed production flowering time, flower morphology analysis of relatives stability of inserted genes over seed generations survivability in natural environment survivability in agricultural environment in presence of herbicide survivability in agricultural environment in absence of herbicide Interaction with other organisms- alterations to traditional relationships Interactions with other organisms- novel species Changes to persistence or invasiveness Any selective advantage to the GMO Any selective advantage to sexually compatible species Plan for containment and eradication in the event of escape

15

16 US agencies regulating agricultural biotechnology USDA- APHIS: environmental release USDA- APHIS: environmental release FDA: food safety FDA: food safety EPA: chemical (herbicide, insecticide) uses EPA: chemical (herbicide, insecticide) uses

17 Professional Scientific and/or Medical bodies with an opinion on GM foods Generally Positive Generally Negative

18 Professional Scientific and/or Medical bodies with an opinion on GM foods Generally Positive The U.S. National Research Council (NRC) The U.S. National Research Council (NRC) U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) The American Medical Association, (AMA) The American Medical Association, (AMA) U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) American Society for Plant Biology (ASPB) American Society for Plant Biology (ASPB) Generally Negative

19 Professional Scientific and/or Medical bodies with an opinion on GM foods Generally Positive World Health Organization (WHO) World Health Organization (WHO) Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Royal Society (London) Royal Society (London) Brazil National Academy of Science, Brazil National Academy of Science, Chinese National Academy of Science Chinese National Academy of Science Indian National Academy of Science Indian National Academy of Science Mexican Academy of Science Mexican Academy of Science Third World Academy of Sciences Third World Academy of Sciences Generally Negative

20 Professional Scientific and/or Medical bodies with an opinion on GM foods Generally Positive The U.S. National Research Council (NRC) The U.S. National Research Council (NRC) U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) The American Medical Association, (AMA) The American Medical Association, (AMA) U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) American Society for Plant Biology (ASPB) American Society for Plant Biology (ASPB) World Health Organization (WHO) World Health Organization (WHO) Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Royal Society (London) Royal Society (London) Brazil National Academy of Science, Brazil National Academy of Science, Chinese National Academy of Science Chinese National Academy of Science Indian National Academy of Science Indian National Academy of Science Mexican Academy of Science Mexican Academy of Science Third World Academy of Sciences Third World Academy of Sciences Generally Negative

21 Professional Scientific and/or Medical bodies with an opinion on GM foods Generally Positive The U.S. National Research Council (NRC) The U.S. National Research Council (NRC) U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) The American Medical Association, (AMA) The American Medical Association, (AMA) U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) American Society for Plant Biology (ASPB) American Society for Plant Biology (ASPB) World Health Organization (WHO) World Health Organization (WHO) Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Royal Society (London) Royal Society (London) Brazil National Academy of Science, Brazil National Academy of Science, Chinese National Academy of Science Chinese National Academy of Science Indian National Academy of Science Indian National Academy of Science Mexican Academy of Science Mexican Academy of Science Third World Academy of Sciences Third World Academy of Sciences Generally Negative

22 Documented benefits of biotech crops Farmers Farmers Increased yields Increased yields Decreased chemical costs Decreased chemical costs Cleaner fields Cleaner fields Less fuel used Less fuel used Less tillage Less tillage

23 Documented benefits of biotech crops Consumers Consumers Safer food (mycotoxins in maize) Safer food (mycotoxins in maize) Safer food (greater regulatory scrutiny) Safer food (greater regulatory scrutiny) Less pesticide Less pesticide Environmental benefits Environmental benefits

24 Documented benefits of biotech crops Environment Environment Less pesticide burden Less pesticide burden Safer pesticides Safer pesticides Improved soil from less tillage Improved soil from less tillage Less fuel usage Less fuel usage Increased biodiversity Increased biodiversity

25 Product quality traits in GM plants under test: Feed digestibility; Increased solids;Higher amino acid content Esthetic appeal; Improved shelf life;Reduced caffeine coffee Protein content; Oil profile; Fruit size; Fruit carbo profile Toxin degradation; Phytate reduced; Heat stable; B-glucanase increased Starch content; Increased stanol; Storage protein altered; Lignin reduced; Glutenin added; Bruise resistance Increased antioxidents; Amino acid enhanced Plus: Pharmaceuticalsantibodies vaccines enzymes nutriceuticals

26 Conclusion: prospects Beneficiaries will continue to include farmers and consumers Beneficiaries will continue to include farmers and consumers Benefits of products will be more obvious and geared to consumers Benefits of products will be more obvious and geared to consumers Nutritional enhancements (Golden rice) Nutritional enhancements (Golden rice) Safer foods (reduced allergens, toxins and other natural antinutritional factors) Safer foods (reduced allergens, toxins and other natural antinutritional factors) Safer foods (better storage and testing) Safer foods (better storage and testing)


Download ppt "Plant breeding and plant genetics: Biotechnology past, present and future Alan McHughen, DPhil. Univ. of California Riverside, Ca. 92521"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google