Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparison of AngioJET Rheolytic Thrombectomy Before Direct Infarct Artery STENTing in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: the JETSTENT trial David.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparison of AngioJET Rheolytic Thrombectomy Before Direct Infarct Artery STENTing in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: the JETSTENT trial David."— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparison of AngioJET Rheolytic Thrombectomy Before Direct Infarct Artery STENTing in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: the JETSTENT trial David Antoniucci on behalf of the JETSTENT Investigators

2 JETSTENT TRIAL Steering Committe: D Antoniucci (PI), A Colombo (PI), F-J Neumann, A Rodriguez, A Stabile, J Gustafson Data monitoring and management and Core Labs: MCR (EKG, Angio), Florence University (Nuclear) Clinical event adjudication committee: GB Danzi (I), C Di Mario (UK), and I Moussa (USA) Country sites: Italy (4); Argentina (1); Germany (1); Poland (3). Sponsor: Medrad Interventional/Possis

3 After angiography and IRA wiring: thrombus grade 3 to 5 Randomization 1:1 Pts with STEMI admitted within 12 hours from symptom onset  Lysis  Stroke < 30 days  Surgery < 6 weeks  Pre-stented IRA Rheolytic Thrombectomy +DSDirect Stenting (DS) Study Design N = 500

4 JETSTENT TRIAL  Primary surrogate end points: Early ST-segment resolution (≥ 50% ST segment elevation reduction at 30 minutes) Infarct size (1-month 99m Tc sestamibi scintigraphy)  Clinical end points: MACCE at 1, 6, and 12 months, Death and Readmission for HCF at 12 months  Secondary surrogate end points: TIMI flow, cTFC, and TIMI blush

5 Baseline Characteristics RTDS n=256 n=245 p value  Age (yrs)63.0 ± 12.364.3 ± 11.5.208  Sex (male) 195 (76)199 (81).168  Hypertension 120 (47)116 (47).916  Dyslipidemia77 (30)85 (35).270  Diabetes mellitus36 (14)37 (15).742  Previous MI10 (3.9)12 (4.9).588  Anterior MI101 (39)91 (37).595  Cardiogenic shock7 (2.7)13 (5.3).142  ST elevation (mm) 3.98 ± 2.494.02 ± 2.69.886  Symptom-ER (min) 125 [85-221.5] 135 [85.7-226.7].853

6 Baseline Angiographic Characteristics RTDS n=256 n=245 p value  Multivessel disease114 (44)95 (39).192  IRA.483 LAD107 (42)91 (37) RCA112 (44)120 (49) LCx37 (14)34 (14)  RVD (mm)2.94 [2.67-3.24] 2.91 [2.62-3.25].670  Pre-wiring TIMI flow 0-1212/254 (83.5)203/242 (83.9).899  Post-wiring TIMI flow 0-1 142/231 (61.4) 129/222 (58.1).465  Thrombus grade.640 1-23 (1.4)3 (1.4) 373 (32.5)80 (37.4) 483 (37.4)79 (36.9) 563 (28.4)52 (24.3)

7 RTDS n=256n=245 p value  ER-PCI (min)34 [15-67]31 [18-60].727  Procedural time (min) 59.5 [44.7-70] 46 [35-60] <.001  Predilation before RT5/246 (2)  TIMI flow 3 after RT159/ 222 (72)  Predilation before stenting25 (9.8)34 (13.9).149  Stent per pt 1.26 ± 0.541.40 ± 0.73.022  Mean stent length (mm) 23.7 ± 10.925.9 ± 14.1.050  Abciximab249 (97)239 (98).841  Procedural success237 (93)229 (93).696 Procedural Characteristics

8 RTDS n=256n=245 p value  Major bleeding (TIMI criteria) 10 (3.9)4 (1.6).123  RT related pacing2 (0.08)-.165  Perforation0 1* (0.04).327 * Covered stent. Complications Complications

9 Surrogate Endpoints RTDS n=246n=240  ST ≥ 50% at 30 min 85.8%78.8%.043 n=217n=208  Infarct Size (%)11.8 [3.1-23.7] 12.7 [4.7-23.3].398 n=252n=241  Final TIMI 3 flow 203 (80.6) 207 (85.9).113 n=228n=216  cTFC 20 [15.0-27.2] 20 [14.0-25.7].357 n=215n=211  Blush grade.207 0-117 (8)11 (5) 243 (20)33 (16) 3155 (72)167 (79)

10 Early ST Resolution and MACCE Non-STR STR p value 1-month n=86n=400  Death6 (7.0)5 (1.3).001  MACCE10 (11.6)15 (3.8).003 6-months n=80n=365  Death8 (10.0)10 (2.7).003  MACCE22 (27.5)53 (14.5).005

11 One-Month Outcome P = 0.050

12 6-Month Outcome RT DS

13 30 min. ST Reduction ≥ 50% (n=471) OR95%CIp value Randomization to RT 1.811.09 – 3.00.022 Anterior AMI0.280.17 – 0.46<.001 Abciximab4.281.22 – 14.95.023 TIMI 3 flow2.101.17 - 3.80.013 Predictors of ST-segment Resolution and 1-month MACCE Logistic regression (forward stepwise) 1-month MACCE (n=486) OR95%CIp value Randomization to RT 0.300.11 – 0.80.017 Abciximab0.100.02 – 0.43.002 TIMI 3 flow0.160.06 – 0.41<.001 Bleeding9.112.17 – 38.17.003

14 N=464 Events RT = 28 Events DS = 47 Log-rank test p=0.007 80.7 ± 4.1 64.1 ± 6.0 Time (days) 2402101801501209060300 100 90 80 70 60 50 Six-month MACCE Kaplan-Meier Estimate RT DS (%)

15 Conclusions  Rheolytic thrombectomy before direct IRA stenting as compared to direct IRA stenting alone is associated with a better myocardial reperfusion (higher early ST-segment resolution rate) and 6-month clinical outcome (lower MACCE rate).  The results of the JETSTENT trial support the routine use of rheolytic thrombectomy in STEMI patients with evidence of thrombus.


Download ppt "Comparison of AngioJET Rheolytic Thrombectomy Before Direct Infarct Artery STENTing in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: the JETSTENT trial David."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google