Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ETHYLENE OXIDE STERILIZATION VALIDATION

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ETHYLENE OXIDE STERILIZATION VALIDATION"— Presentation transcript:

1 ETHYLENE OXIDE STERILIZATION VALIDATION
Pacific BioLabs Inc. (510)

2 EO ADVANTAGES Highly effective against most microbes Highly diffusive
Compatible with a wide variety of materials in devices and packaging

3 EO DISADVANTAGES Complex process Longer turn-around times
BI Testing Residual disipation Safety concerns Flammable Explosive OSHA concerns Carcinogen EPA concerns Emissions

4 DETERMINE THE STANDARD
AAMI/ISO ed “Sterilization of health care products – Ethylene oxide - Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices” Europe – EN 550

5 EO GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS AAMI Technical Information Reports (TIR’s)
14 Contract sterilization 15 Equipment 16 Microbiological aspects 20 Parametric release 28 Product adoption and process equivalency

6 EO PROCESSING STEPS Preconditioning/conditioning
Exposure to RH and temperature Ensure uniformity of these conditions Sterilization cycle Exposure to EO gas Aeration Dissipation of remaining gases

7 DECISIVE PROCESS PARAMETERS
Gas concentration >400mg/L Temperature ~100 – 140ºC Relative humidity ~35 – 80% Exposure (dwell) time 2 – 10 hours

8 DEEP VACUUM CYCLE

9 SHALLOW VACUUM CYCLE

10 FACTORS AFFECTING CYCLE SUCCESS
Bioburden Product/package properties Loading configuration Cycle parameters

11 EO VALIDATION OVERVIEW
Process development Product compatibility Commissioning PQ – Physical PQ – Microbiological Certification Revalidation

12 PROCESS CONTROL Must assure that validated process parameters are met
Temperature RH Gas concentration Biological indicators are used to demonstrate lethality Microprocessors are used to control process

13 RELEASE MECHANISMS Documentation showing that processing specification are met Successful results of tests Sterility of BI EO residues Packaging Pyrogens

14 PARAMETRIC RELEASE BIs not used in release Validation more involved
Routine control more rigorous AAMI TIR20:2001 “Parametric release for ethylene oxide sterilization”

15 PRODUCT COMPATIBILITY
Post sterilization testing for Device functionality Package integrity and strength Residue dissipation rates Impact of re-sterilization

16 COMMISSIONING Equipment specifications/diagram Calibration records
Profiles for Preconditioning (temp. and RH) Aeration rooms (temp.) Empty chamber temperature distribution

17 PQ - PHYSICAL Profiles within loaded preconditioning and aeration areas Loaded chamber temperature distribution studies Diagrams showing load configuration, thermocouple and BI placement

18 PQ - MICROBIOLOGICAL Records of performance runs (sub-lethal, half, and full cycles) Diagrams of load configuration with BI and thermocouple placement BI test result Sterility test result of product B/F testing

19 INITIATING A VALIDATION
Determine the standard Insure appropriate packaging Determine worst case load Determine challenge device Internal Process challenge device (PCD) Select Validation Method BI release Parametric

20 CHALLENGE DEVICES Internal Challenge Device (ICD)
Most difficult to sterilize devices seeded with a BI in the most difficult to sterilize location PCD An external BI test pack that replaces the internal challenge device Should be an equal or more difficult challenge to the process than the ICD Developed using comparative resistance studies

21 PARAMETRIC RELEASE Benefits Faster TAT
Useful if extended aeration not required Considerations More complicated validation Minimum of 6 or 7 sub lethal cycles Direct measurement of EO, RH and temp. Load configuration becomes more critical

22 BI RELEASE BI Overkill (most common) Demonstrate 10-6 SAL
Assume bioburden has lower population & resistance than BI Need a > 12 Spore Log Reduction (SPL) of BI Combined BI/Bioburden Absolute Bioburden (rarely used)

23 BIOBURDEN TESTING Test 10 samples randomly selected
Determine recovery factor – validation If bioburden >100, comparative resistance study required If bioburden <100, you are OK

24 SAMPLE PLACEMENT Protocol must detail the number and location of all samples in load BI’s Product sterility (if applicable) ETO residuals Product functionality Package integrity LAL

25 VALIDATION CYCLES Fractional cycles Half cycles Full cycles

26 FRACTIONAL CYCLE Must be run when bioburden >100 and no comparative resistance studies are performed Desired cycle time must results in some positive BI and sterile product in sterility tests A minimum of 20 product sterility samples (10 TSB, 10 FTM) Product sterility samples must be placed adjacent to BI

27 HALF CYCLES Three half cycles must be run in production chamber with a gas dwell time half the full cycle dwell time The following must be placed in load Temperature and humidity sensors Internal BI External BI (optional) Product sterility samples if comparative resistance studies not done or inconclusive

28 FULL CYCLE A minimum of one full cycle is required for the Micro PQ
Three cycles are required to meet residual requirements The following samples are included EO residual Product functionality Packaging integrity External BI (routine release BI) LAL

29 EO RESIDUAL TESTING 1 - 3 samples of each type should be tested at a minimum of 3 time intervals from processing (Ex. 1, 3, & 5 days) This must be done after 3 full cycles Testing for EO and ECH Samples must be shipped frozen

30 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Bioburden must be in control
Product sterility all neg after half cycles Acceptable B&F test BI Testing Fractional cycle - some should grow Half cycle - all negative Full cycle - all negative

31 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (cont.)
Temperature sensors <10°C Humidity sensors <30% EO residual Product functionality Package integrity LAL

32 REVALIDATION Annually the status of the sterilization validation must be reviewed Physical and biological revalidation must be conducted every two years Inspection of Product design and packaging Chamber performance, calibration and maintenance

33 REVALIDATION (cont.) If there have been changes in product design, packaging, or chamber performance, a physical and biological revalidation may be required Validation should consist of a minimum of one half cycle and one full cycle

34 REFERENCES AAMI/ISO ed. Sterilization of health care products- Ethylene oxide- Part 1: requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process from medical devices AAMI TIR No. 16:2000, Process development and performance qualification for ethylene oxide sterilization – Microbiological aspects AAMI TIR No. 29:2001, Parametric release for ethylene oxide sterilization AAMI TIR 28:2001, Product adoption and process equivalency for ethylene oxide sterilization

35 THANK YOU Q & A


Download ppt "ETHYLENE OXIDE STERILIZATION VALIDATION"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google