2. Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act: MCCCD Performance Jennifer Kaufman Fourness Manager, Workforce Initiatives Workforce Development March 7, 2013 1

3. Carl D. Perkins Performance Measures 2 Perkins recipients are required by law to report on 6 specific core indicators each year Individual state performance levels are set by the Office of Vocational Education, with input from the state Recipients must meet at least 90% of the agreed upon level of performance  If a recipient fails to meet at least 90% of the agreed upon level of performance, a performance improvement plan is required  If a recipient fails to meet at least 90% of the agreed upon level of performance for any core indicator 3 years in a row, some or all funds may be withheld

4. MCCCD Performance 2011-2012 3 MeasureTitle 11-12 Final Agreed Upon Performance Level 11-12 MCCCD Actual 1P1Technical Skill Attainment85.096.5 2P1Credential, Certificate, Degree41.544.7 3P1Student Retention or Transfer50.067.4 4P1Student Placement38.049.1 5P1Nontraditional Participation22.529.3 5P2Nontraditional Completion17.527.0

5. Performance Measures: MCCCD Operational Definitions 4 Participant: Student who earned credit in a vocational course (flagged as vocational in SIS during FY11- 12 (Summer II 2011 through Summer I 2012) Concentrator: Student that has been a PS student at the college for not longer than five(5) years who attended in FY11-12 (Fall 2011 or Spring 2012) and met either of the following 2 conditions: 1.Had at least 9 cumulative earned hours in a single vocational subject area earned through Summer II 2012 AND had at least 12 cumulative earned hours in the vocational course subject plus additional AGEC coursework earned through the same period OR 2. Received an occupational certificate (plan begins with 5) of less than 12 credit hours in FY11-12 (Fall 2011 – Summer II 2012)

6. Performance Measures: MCCCD Operational Definitions (cont.) 5 MCCCD uses student course taking behavior to determine student program assignment Courses are organized by prefix and are assigned to one, and only one, 6 digit CIP (Classification of Instruction Program) code – NOT program This system allows us to see how may concentrators we have in a particular field of study, NOT Program * Understanding the concentrator definition and how MCCCD ‘operationalizes’ the definition is key to correctly interpret all Perkins data

7. 1P1: Technical Skill Assessment 6 Denominator: FY10-11 concentrators (we are analyzing students who left the college) who did not enroll in Fall 2011 and who took an assessment while enrolled or up to December 31. 2012 Numerator: Number of students in the denominator who passed the exam # Test Takers Denominator: # Test Takers Who Met Concentrator Definition Numerator: # Test Takers Who Met Concentrator Definition and Passed MCCCD Actual Performance State Final Agreed Upon Level of Performance 2,0251,3041,25996.5%85.0%

8. 1P1: Technical Skill Assessment 7 Program AreasAssessment Education and TrainingAEPA – Arizona Educator Proficiency Assessments Business ManagementArizona Department of Education Nurse AssistingCNA – Certified Nurse Assistant Respiratory TherapistCRT – Certified Respiratory Therapist Dental Assisting-HygieneNBDHE – National Board Dental Hygiene Examination EMTEMT – Emergency Medical Technician Practical NursingNCLEX-PN – National Council Licensure Examination Registered NurseNCLEX-RN – National Council Licensure Examination Automotive TechnicianSec 609 – Environmental Protection Agency Business ManagementWAFCRMC – Western Association of Food Chains

9. 2P1: Credential, Certificate or Degree 8 Denominator: FY10-11 concentrators (prior year concentrators) who did not enroll in Fall 2011 Numerator: Number of students in the denominator who received an award in FY10-11 DenominatorNumerator: MCCCD Actual Performance State Final Agreed Upon Level of Performance 14,4966,47644.7%41.5%

10. 3P1: Student Retention or Transfer 9 Denominator: FY10-11 concentrators (prior year concentrators) who enrolled in Fall 2011 and did not receive an award in FY10-11 Numerator: Number of students in the denominator who either re-enrolled in Fall 2011 (retention) OR enrolled in a university or other community college in Fall 2011 (transfer); use National Student Clearinghouse DenominatorNumerator: MCCCD Actual Performance State Final Agreed Upon Level of Performance 15,49910,44367.4%50.0%

11. 4P1: Student Placement 10 Denominator: FY10-11 concentrators (prior year concentrators) who did not enroll in Fall 2011 Numerator: Number of students in the denominator who had Q4 2011 wages of at least $3750, use Department of Economic Security Data DenominatorNumerator: MCCCD Actual Performance State Final Agreed Upon Level of Performance 7,11214,49649.1%38.0%

12. DES Data-Sharing Agreement 11 The current agreement for Perkins is with the Unemployment Insurance (UI) division of DES. In the current process, we send UI a file of student data, and UI responds with wage data for the students they can find/match in the identified time period. UI is only able to provide wage data. Research has begun to determine if another unit of DES would be able to provide sector or SOC code data. Internal efforts to date, and efforts of other states will be reviewed.

13. 5P1: Nontraditional Participation 12 Denominator: FY11-12 participants in programs designated as non- traditional for one gender Numerator: Number of students in the denominator whose gender is the under-represented gender for the program DenominatorNumerator: MCCCD Actual Performance State Final Agreed Upon Level of Performance 35,40710,36929.3%22.5%

14. 5P2: Nontraditional Completion 13 Denominator: FY10-11 concentrators who received an award in FY10-11 in a program designated as non-traditional for one gender Numerator: Number of students in the denominator whose gender is the under-represented gender for the program DenominatorNumerator: MCCCD Actual Performance State Final Agreed Upon Level of Performance 3,68099227.0%17.5%