Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

AQUEDUCT Charles Iceland Use of Geo and Satellite Data

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "AQUEDUCT Charles Iceland Use of Geo and Satellite Data"— Presentation transcript:

1 AQUEDUCT Charles Iceland Use of Geo and Satellite Data
September 5, 2013

2 WATER STRESS

3 Baseline Water Stress 2010 BWS = 2010 total withdrawals / mean(Ba)
Ensemble_view.R BWS = 2010 total withdrawals / mean(Ba) mean(Ba) calculated using mean annual NASA GLDAS-2/NOAH runoff from

4 Aqueduct water supply estimates
NASA Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) plays a key role: GLDAS inputs include: Temperature Precipitation Elevation Wind speed Water retention of soil Etc. GLDAS outputs include: Soil moisture Evapotranspiration Runoff (surface and shallow groundwater) GLDAS runoff values for period are used to bias-correct runoff estimates from 6 GCMs

5 Bias-correcting model runoff
Make Burlington plots on same Y-axis? From pixel_ts_plot.R, pixel_gev_plot.R

6 Change in total water supply
2040 relative to 1995 baseline DRAFT

7 Total Blue Water (Bt) 21-year window

8 Change in inter-annual variability of water supply
2040 relative to 1995 baseline DRAFT

9 Interannual Variability (IAV) 21-year window

10 Change in seasonal variability of water supply
2040 relative to 1995 baseline DRAFT

11 Seasonal Variability (SV)

12 Projected Water Stress 2020
DRAFT Ensemble_view.R Water stress = 2020 projected total withdrawals / Ba Ba calculated using median of 6 mean annual GCM runoff from

13 Change in water stress for 2020
relative to 2010 baseline DRAFT

14 GROUND- WATER

15 Groundwater Stress the ratio of groundwater withdrawal relative to the recharge rate to aquifer size; values above one indicate where unsustainable consumption could affect groundwater availability and dependent ecosystems Groundwater stress is groundwater withdrawal / relative to the groundwater recharge rate. The withdrawal data is from The recharge rate is modeled from data between There are 748 aquifers. Values above one indicate where unsustainable water consumption could affect groundwater availability and dependent ecosystems. Many places around the world depend on withdrawals from underground aquifers to meet their water needs. Many of these aquifers filled gradually over the course of millennia. The red parts of this map are places where groundwater is being pumped out from aquifers faster than they are being recharged by surface water gradually seeping in. In these places, as aquifers are depleted faster than they are refilled, wells must be dug deeper and deeper, and could eventually run dry. Data Sources: Water Balance of Global Aquifers Revealed by Groundwater Footprint, Gleeson, T., Wada, Y., Bierkens, M.F.P., and van Beek, L.P.H.,

16 GROUNDWATER DATA Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE)

17 SURFACE WATER

18 The Global Reservoir and Lake Monitor (GRLM)
Charon Birkett, ESSIC/UMD Curt Reynolds, USDA/FAS A NASA/USDA sponsored program in collaboration with NASA/GSFC and the University of Maryland at College Park. Additional lake databases and web links. LAKENET Additional 3-D imagery provided by USGS Application of Satellite Radar Altimetry for surface water level monitoring. Jason-2/OSTM C.Birkett ESSIC/UMD

19 FLOODS

20 FLOOD IS GROWING BY 2050: +2.0 BILLION vulnerable to flooding
A COSTLY RISK IS GROWING BY 2050: +2.0 BILLION vulnerable to flooding +$ BILLION/YR adaptation cost Source: Munich Re, Topics Geo. Natural catastrophes 2012

21 PREDICTIVE POWER LET’S BUILD 1KM FLOOD MAPS RIVER FLOOD MODELS
LOSS ESTIMATES SCENARIO ANALYSIS PROBABILITY OF LOSS

22 DROUGHT

23 Near real-time Global Agricultural Monitoring System (GLAM)
Correlates significant anomalies to drought conditions and shortfalls in crop production. Famine Early Warning System Network (FEWS NET) Provides early warning on emerging and evolving food security issues. GLAM is a collaboration between NASA/GSFC, USDA/FAS, SSAI, and UMD Department of Geography FEWS NET is funded by USAID – partners include NOAA, USGS, NASA, Chemonics, and USDA/FAS

24 Long-term projections for drought
Projections of changes in the frequency, duration and severity of drought relative to recent experience  Projections will be developed for multiple types of drought: Soil moisture Evapotranspiration deficit Hydrological drought Image: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007

25 WATER QUALITY

26 WATER QUALITY CHLOROPHYL PHOSPHORUS TURBIDITY MODIS
250m+ / twice per day 1999- LANDSAT 30m+ / 16 days + tasked 1972-

27 Charles Iceland Senior associate

28 APPENDIX SLIDES

29 Aqueduct water supply estimates
NASA Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) plays a key role: GLDAS inputs include: Temperature Precipitation Elevation Wind speed Water retention of soil Etc. GLDAS outputs include: Soil moisture Evapotranspiration Runoff (surface and shallow groundwater) GLDAS runoff values for period are used to bias-correct runoff estimates from 6 GCMs Baseline Supply = median of mean annual runoff from 6 bias-corrected GCMs for a window of time ending in 2010 Future Supply = median of mean annual runoff from 6 bias-corrected GCMs for a window of time centered on 2020

30 Bias-correcting model runoff
“quantile mapping” aka “cumulative distribution function matching” (Mason, 2007) Bias correction occurs at the pixel level for each month Based on generalized extreme value distribution (3 parameters) Corrects for all moments, including location, spread, skew Assumes stationarity of bias From pixel_ts_plot.R, pixel_gev_plot.R

31 Bias-correcting model runoff
Make Burlington plots on same Y-axis? From pixel_ts_plot.R, pixel_gev_plot.R

32 Example locations bias-corrected raw runoff
Ensemble median GLDAS-2 Runoff (m) Possibly adjust the Y-axes (maybe not the same, but possibly all starting at zero)? From pixel_ts_plot.R Year 11 yr running means

33 GOALS & MILESTONES Objective: Project change (from baseline) in water risk for three Aqueduct Framework indicators Water stress (Water withdrawal ratio) Inter-annual variability Seasonal (i.e., intra-annual or monthly) variability Interim results: May 2013 Preliminary projections for 2020 One draft scenario of supply and demand Six climate models; one initial condition per model Final release: January 2014 Three time periods centered on 2020, 2030, and 2040 Three scenarios of supply and demand Six climate models; multiple initial conditions per model

34 Baseline Water Stress Definition:
Total Annual Withdrawals / mean(Annual Available Blue Water) Available Blue Water = accumulated runoff accumulated consumptive use Interpretation: The degree to which freshwater availability is an ongoing concern. High levels of baseline water stress are associated with: Increased socioeconomic competition for freshwater supplies, More reliance on engineered water supply infrastructure, Heightened political attention to issues of water scarcity, and Higher risk of supply disruptions.

35 Change in Water Stress Definition:
Future Water Stress / Baseline Water Stress Interpretation: Estimated rate of change in water stress due to: Changes in use due to population growth, economic development, and technology Changes in supply due to climate change High rates of change associated with: Faster pace of socio-economic and technological change required to keep pace

36 Choosing Global Climate Models (GCMs)
Select subset of 6 models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5; to be used for IPCC AR5) Selection criteria: Availability: terms of use, parameter availability (runoff and evapotranspiration) Quality for this purpose: best representations of historical runoff (not global mean temperature) Long-term average Standard deviation Data provided by Alkama et al. (2013); evaluated 15 CMIP5 models against gauge data for 18 large basins.

37 Choices Rank Model Center Country Resolution Historical members
RCP4.5 members RCP8.5 members Commercial use? 1 GFDL-ESM2M GFDL USA 2.5 x 2  1 Y 2 MPI-ESM-LR MPI Germany 1.875 x 1.875 3 MRI-CGCM3 MRI Japan 1.125 x 2.25 5 N 4 CNRM-CM5 CNRM France 1.4 x 1.4 10 CCSM4 NCAR 1.25 x 6 INM-CM4 INM Russia 2 x 1.5 7 CanESM2 CCCMA Canada 2.8 x 2.8 8 IPSL-CM5A-LR IPSL 3.75 x 1.875 9 HadCM3 MOHC UK 3.75 x 2.5  10 none MIROC5 MIROC  5 11 NorESM1-M NCC Norway 2.5 x 1.875 12 CSIRO-Mk3.6.0 CSIRO Australia 13 FGOALS-g2.0  LASG China 14 GISS-E2-R GISS 15 BCC-CSM1.1 BCC

38 Example locations flow accumulated runoff (Bt)
Ensemble median GLDAS-2 Runoff (m) Adjust Y-axes? From pixel_ts_plot.R Year 11 yr running means

39 Estimating water use: previous work (Coca-Cola)
Domestic Use Industrial Use Agricultural Use $15,000 $60,000 $1,000 Domestic = f(population, GDP/capita) Adjusted R2=0.85 Industrial = f(GDP, GDP/Capita) Adjusted R2=0.70 Agricultural = f(population, GDP/Capita, ag land, %ag land under irrigation) Adjusted R2=0.90 Each sector responds differently to changing levels of economic development (GDP/Capita) Cross-sectional analysis generally produces optimistic Kuznets curves

40 Preliminary maps of projected change
Baseline Supply = mean annual runoff from GLDAS-2/NOAH current release Demand = 2010 use FAO Aquastat withdrawals by sector, estimated for 2010 using a mean of fixed and random effects models consumptive use computed by consumptive use ratio (Shiklomanov and Rodda 2003) Future Supply = median of mean annual runoff from 6 GCMs Demand = projected change in 2010 use change in scenario use by sector applied to baseline use [2010 use] * [2020 scenario use] / [2010 scenario use] Projected change maps are computed as future / baseline

41


Download ppt "AQUEDUCT Charles Iceland Use of Geo and Satellite Data"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google