Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A KTEC Center of Excellence 1 Convex Optimization: Part 1 of Chapter 7 Discussion Presenter: Brian Quanz.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A KTEC Center of Excellence 1 Convex Optimization: Part 1 of Chapter 7 Discussion Presenter: Brian Quanz."— Presentation transcript:

1 A KTEC Center of Excellence 1 Convex Optimization: Part 1 of Chapter 7 Discussion Presenter: Brian Quanz

2 A KTEC Center of Excellence 2 About today’s discussion… Chapter 7 – no separate discussion of convex optimization Discusses with SVM problems Instead: Today: Discuss convex optimization Next Week: Discuss some specific convex optimization problems (from text), e.g. SVMs

3 A KTEC Center of Excellence 3 About today’s discussion… Mostly follow alternate text: Convex Optimization, Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe – Borrowed material from book and related course notes – Some figures and equations shown here Available online: http://www.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvxbook/ Nice course lecture videos available from Stephen Boyd online: http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee364a/ Corresponding convex optimization tool (discuss later) - CVX: http://www.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvx/

4 A KTEC Center of Excellence 4 Overview Why convex? What is convex? Key examples of linear and quadratic programming Key mathematical ideas to discuss: ->Lagrange Duality ->KKT conditions Brief concept of interior point methods CVX – convex opt. made easy

5 A KTEC Center of Excellence 5 Mathematical Optimization All learning is some optimization problem -> Stick to canonical form x = (x 1, x 2, …, x p ) – opt. variables ; x* f 0 : R p -> R – objective function f i : R p -> R – constraint function

6 A KTEC Center of Excellence 6 Optimization Example Well familiar with: regularized regression Least squares Add some constraints, ridge, lasso

7 A KTEC Center of Excellence 7 Why convex optimization? Can’t solve most OPs E.g. NP Hard, even high polynomial time too slow Convex OPs (Generally) No analytic solution Efficient algorithms to find (global) solution Interior point methods (basically Iterated Newton) can be used: – ~[10-100]*max{p 3, p 2 m, F} ; F cost eval. obj. and constr. f At worst solve with general IP methods (CVX), faster specialized

8 A KTEC Center of Excellence 8 What is Convex Optimization? OP with convex objective and constraint functions f 0, …, f m are convex = convex OP that has an efficient solution!

9 A KTEC Center of Excellence 9 Convex Function Definition: the weighted mean of function evaluated at any two points is greater than or equal to the function evaluated at the weighted mean of the two points

10 A KTEC Center of Excellence 10 Convex Function What does definition mean? Pick any two points x, y and evaluate along the function, f(x), f(y) Draw the line passing through the two points f(x) and f(y) Convex if function evaluated on any point along the line between x and y is below the line between f(x) and f(y)

11 A KTEC Center of Excellence 11 Convex Function

12 A KTEC Center of Excellence 12 Convex Function Convex!

13 A KTEC Center of Excellence 13 Convex Function Not Convex!!!

14 A KTEC Center of Excellence 14 Convex Function Easy to see why convexity allows for efficient solution Just “slide” down the objective function as far as possible and will reach a minimum

15 A KTEC Center of Excellence 15 Local Optima is Global (simple proof)

16 A KTEC Center of Excellence 16 Convex vs. Non-convex Ex. Convex, min. easy to find Affine – border case of convexity

17 A KTEC Center of Excellence 17 Convex vs. Non-convex Ex. Non-convex, easy to get stuck in a local min. Can’t rely on only local search techniques

18 A KTEC Center of Excellence 18 Non-convex Some non-convex problems highly multi-modal, or NP hard Could be forced to search all solutions, or hope stochastic search is successful Cannot guarantee best solution, inefficient Harder to make performance guarantees with approximate solutions

19 A KTEC Center of Excellence 19 Determine/Prove Convexity Can use definition (prove holds) to prove If function restricted to any line is convex, function is convex If 2X differentiable, show hessian >= 0 Often easier to: Convert to a known convex OP – E.g. QP, LP, SOCP, SDP, often of a more general form Combine known convex functions (building blocks) using operations that preserve convexity – Similar idea to building kernels

20 A KTEC Center of Excellence 20 Some common convex OPs Of particular interest for this book and chapter: linear programming (LP) and quadratic programming (QP) LP: affine objective function, affine constraints -e.g. LP SVM, portfolio management

21 A KTEC Center of Excellence 21 LP Visualization Note: constraints form feasible set -for LP, polyhedra

22 A KTEC Center of Excellence 22 Quadratic Program QP: Quadratic objective, affine constraints LP is special case Many SVM problems result in QP, regression If constraint functions quadratic, then Quadratically Constrained Quadratic Program (QCQP)

23 A KTEC Center of Excellence 23 QP Visualization

24 A KTEC Center of Excellence 24 Second Order Cone Program A i = 0 - results in LP c i = 0 - results in QCQP Constraint requires the affine functions to lie in 2 nd order cone

25 A KTEC Center of Excellence 25 Second Order Cone (Boundary) in R 3

26 A KTEC Center of Excellence 26 Semidefinite Programming Linear matrix inequality (LMI) constraints Many problems can be expressed using LMIs LP and SOCP

27 A KTEC Center of Excellence 27 Semidefinite Programming

28 A KTEC Center of Excellence 28 Building Convex Functions From simple convex functions to complex: some operations that preserve complexity Nonnegative weighted sum Composition with affine function Pointwise maximum and supremum Composition Minimization Perspective ( g(x,t) = tf(x/t) )

29 A KTEC Center of Excellence 29 Verifying Convexity Remarks For more detail and expansion, consult the referenced text, Convex Optimization Geometric Programs also convex, can be handled with a series of SDPs (skipped details here) CVX converts the problem either to SOCP or SDM (or a series of) and uses efficient solver

30 A KTEC Center of Excellence 30 Lagrangian Standard form: Lagrangian L: Lambda, nu, Lagrange multipliers (dual variables)

31 A KTEC Center of Excellence 31 Lagrange Dual Function Lagrange Dual found by minimizing L with respect to primal variables Often can take gradient of L w.r.t. primal var.’s and set = 0 (SVM)

32 A KTEC Center of Excellence 32 Lagrange Dual Function Note: Lagrange dual function is the point- wise infimum of family of affine functions of (lambda, nu) Thus, g is concave even if problem is not convex

33 A KTEC Center of Excellence 33 Lagrange Dual Function Lagrange Dual provides lower bound on objective value at solution

34 A KTEC Center of Excellence 34 Lagrangian as Linear Approximation, Lower Bound Simple interpretation of Lagrangian Can incorporate the constraints into objective as indicator functions Infinity if violated, 0 otherwise: In Lagrangian we use a “soft” linear approximation to the indicator functions; under-estimator since 0

35 A KTEC Center of Excellence 35 Lagrange Dual Problem Why not make the lower bound best possible? Dual problem: Always convex opt. problem (even when primal is non-convex) Weak Duality: d* <= p* (have already seen this)

36 A KTEC Center of Excellence 36 Strong Duality If d* = p*, strong duality holds Does not hold in general Slater’s Theorem: If convex problem, and strictly feasible point exists, then strong duality holds! (proof too involved, refer to text) => For convex problems, can use dual problem to find solution

37 A KTEC Center of Excellence 37 Complementary Slackness When strong duality holds Sandwiched between f 0 (x), last 2 inequalities are equalities, simple! (definition) (since constraints satisfied at x*)

38 A KTEC Center of Excellence 38 Complementary Slackness Which means: Since each term is non-positive, we have complementary slackness: Whenever constraint is non-active, corresponding multiplier is zero

39 A KTEC Center of Excellence 39 Complementary Slackness This can also be described by Since usually only a few active constraints at solution (see geometry), the dual variable lambda is often sparse Note: In general no guarantee

40 A KTEC Center of Excellence 40 Complementary Slackness As we will see, this is why support vector machines result in solution with only key support vectors These come from the dual problem, constraints correspond to points, and complementary slackness ensures only the “active” points are kept

41 A KTEC Center of Excellence 41 Complementary Slackness However, avoid common misconceptions when it comes to SVM and complementary slackness! E.g. if Lagrange multiplier is 0, constraint could still be active! (not bijection!) This means:

42 A KTEC Center of Excellence 42 KKT Conditions The KKT conditions are then just what we call that set of conditions required at the solution (basically list what we know) KKT conditions play important role Can sometimes be used to find solution analytically Otherwise can think of many methods as ways of solving KKT conditions

43 A KTEC Center of Excellence 43 KKT Conditions Again given strong duality and assuming differentiable, since gradient must be 0 at x* Thus, putting it all together, for non-convex problems we have

44 A KTEC Center of Excellence 44 KKT Conditions – non-convex Necessary conditions

45 A KTEC Center of Excellence 45 KKT Conditions – convex Also sufficient conditions: 1+2 -> xt is feasible. 3 -> L(x,lt,nt) is convex 5 -> xt minimizes L(x,lt,nt) so g(lt,nt) = L(xt,lt,nt)

46 A KTEC Center of Excellence 46 Brief description of interior point method Solve a series of equality constrained problems with Newton’s method Approximate constraints with log-barrier (approx. of indicator)

47 A KTEC Center of Excellence 47 Brief description of interior point method As t gets larger, approximation becomes better

48 A KTEC Center of Excellence 48 Central Path Idea

49 A KTEC Center of Excellence 49 CVX: Convex Optimization Made Easy CVX is a Matlab toolbox Allows you to flexibly express convex optimization problems Translates these to a general form and uses efficient solver (SOCP, SDP, or a series of these) http://www.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvx/ All you have to do is design the convex optimization problem Plug into CVX, a first version of algorithm implemented More specialized solver may be necessary for some applications

50 A KTEC Center of Excellence 50 CVX - Examples Quadratic program: given H, f, A, and b cvx_begin variable x(n) minimize (x’*H*x + f’*x) subject to A*x >= b cvx_end

51 A KTEC Center of Excellence 51 CVX - Examples SVM-type formulation with L1 norm cvx_begin variable w(p) variable b(1) variable e(n) expression by(n) by = train_label.*b; minimize( w'*(L + I)*w + C*sum(e) + l1_lambda*norm(w,1) ) subject to X*w + by >= a - e; e >= ec; cvx_end

52 A KTEC Center of Excellence 52 CVX - Examples More complicated terms built with expressions cvx_begin variable w(p+1+n); expression q(ec); for i =1:p for j =i:p if(A(i,j) == 1) q(ct) = max(abs(w(i))/d(i),abs(w(j))/d(j)); ct=ct+1; end end end minimize( f'*w + lambda*sum(q) ) subject to X*w >= a; cvx_end

53 A KTEC Center of Excellence 53 Questions Questions, Comments?

54 A KTEC Center of Excellence 54 Extra proof


Download ppt "A KTEC Center of Excellence 1 Convex Optimization: Part 1 of Chapter 7 Discussion Presenter: Brian Quanz."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google