Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Dealing with Uncertainty in Energy Systems Models.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Dealing with Uncertainty in Energy Systems Models."— Presentation transcript:

1 Dealing with Uncertainty in Energy Systems Models

2 Overview Intro: SATIM UNEP Project – SATIM-MC MAPS Project – SATIM-SP

3 ERC’s Bread n Butter Model: SATIM (South African TIMES Model) Deterministic Least Cost Planning Model (Similar to Model used for IRP/IEP) Uncertainty affecting operation/short-term decisions (dispatch): – Unpredictable hourly fluctuation in wind regime, load – Unpredictable chances of a large thermal unit breaking down – Dealt with using outside model (LOLP calculator/Dispatch Model) Uncertainty affecting medium to long term decisions (investment): – Demand: Economic Growth, technology and fuel costs, Behaviour – Supply: Technology and fuel costs – This is normally dealt with using scenarios

4 UNEP: SATIM-MC Projecting South African CO 2 emissions to 2050 The Model : Demographics Economy Fuels SATIM energy model Least cost energy mix UNCERTAINTY Technology GHG Emissions Projection Monte Carlo algorithm SATIM Expert Elicitation Combined Elicited Distributions Resulting GHG Emissions Projection + Full Story

5 Some of the Distributions: Global Prices – Results of 108 runs of Imaclim-W Coal 2010 $/ton Gas 2010 $/MMBtu Oil 2010 $/bbl Without Mitigation With Mitigation (2 deg)

6 Other Distributions: GDP/Coal price From Expert Elicitations Coal Price Supply Curves Range R/ton Cumul. Mt GDP growth GDP Growth for 10 Samples

7 Stochastic TIMES Analysis of hedging strategies

8 Stochastic TIMES (cont.) TIMES offers the possibility of doing stochastic programming with recourse on the following parameters: – Capacity limits (which can be used to allow/disallow techs/fuels with different costs/prices) – Cumulative limits on flows (reserves) – Seasonal availabilities (useful for hydro: dry year) – Damage Costs of emissions – Demand Projections (growth) Can be used to construct up to 5 stages, with a large number of states of the world Objective function can also be altered: – Linearised expected utility criterion (where risk/variance is added to the cost) – MiniMax – least regret (Savage criterion, when likelihoods are not well known)

9 MAPS: SATIM-SP Use some of the distribution data from the UNEP project to analyse some hedging strategies: – Nuclear Programme, given uncertainty about: Growth Gas Price Nuclear costs – Other mitigation policies/targets, given uncertainty about: Uncertainties listed above + Damage costs? Global CO2 prices?

10 IRP Update Experiment Start with Big Gas scenario (Cheap gas – No Nuclear) Gas Price starts at reference step 5 (83 2010 R/GJ dropping to 45 R/GJ by 2035) Gas Price Stays High Gas Price Drops Probability of Low Price GasInstalled Nuclear Capacity 2030 0%4.8 GW 25%3.36 GW 50%2.7 GW 75%0.3 GW (~0 GW) 100%0 Prelim Results 2006 2030 2040


Download ppt "Dealing with Uncertainty in Energy Systems Models."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google