1. Communicating health information in low and middle income countries Richard Smith Editor BMJ www.bmj.com/talks

2. Some assumptions You, the audience, between you know much more than I do about this All teach, all learn In seminars the audience must do most of the talking Lao Tzu said: “Those who know do not speak/Those who speak do not know.” I talk too much

3. Two stories from the last week Final year medical students in Nigeria have never heard of evidence based medicine Calabar in Nigeria had no cybercafes two years ago; now it has 50. The medical school and the hospital do not have internet access. “The problem is ceasing to be access and more how to make sense of all this material.”

4. What I want to discuss The difference between information and knowledge The utility of information Information flow to, from, and within the poor world What are the problems now? What is the role of international journals like the BMJ?

5. Information: the poet’s view Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? And where is the knowledge we have lost in information? T S Eliot

8. The information paradox: Muir Gray “Doctors are overwhelmed with information yet cannot find the information they need when they need it.”

9. Information paradox “Water, water, everywhere Nor any drop to drink” The Rime of the Ancient Mariner

10. Utility of information Utility=relevance x validity x interactivity work to access

11. Utility of different sources of information

12. What’s wrong with medical journals Don’t meet information needs Too many of them Too much rubbish Too hard work Not relevant Too boring Too expensive

13. What’s wrong with medical journals Don’t add value Slow every thing down Too biased Anti-innovatory Too awful to look at Too pompous Too establishment

14. What’s wrong with medical journals Don’t reach the developing world Can’t cope with fraud Nobody reads them Too much duplication Too concerned with authors rather than readers

15. A comment on medical journals from Drummond Rennie, deputy editor (west),JAMA There seems to be no study too fragmented, no hypothesis too trivial, no literature citation too biased or too egotistical, no design too warped, no methodology too bungled, no presentation of results too inaccurate, too obscure, and too contradictory, no analysis too self serving, no argument too circular, no conclusions too trifling or too unjustified, and no grammar and syntax too offensive for a paper to end up in print.

16. How much time did you spend reading around your patients in the past week?

17. Reading of Bristol general practitioners

18. How far behind are you with your reading? Number of journals10 000 New articles a week40 000 Time to read article30 mins A doctor spends all day reading; after six weeks how far behind is he or she with his or her reading? A century

19. A reason to love economists Rational ignorance

20. Information flow to, within, and from the developing world

21. Information flow to developing countries Has been desperately poor in the paper world Problem could perhaps never be solved in the paper world Those in the developing world had limited opportunities to select what they wanted High cost; slow distribution

22. Information flow to developing countries Many smallish organisations have tried to help but didn’t speak with a powerful voice Until recently little importance given to this by organisations like WHO, World Bank, etc Information less important than drugs, but is that true? Little evaluation

23. Information flow to developing countries The electronic world offers many new possibilities The HINARI (Health Internet Network for Access to Research Information) project involves nearly 30 publishers allowing access to the material free to institutions in the 68 poorest countries Over 2000 medical journals, all the major ones

24. Information flow to developing countries 438 institutions in 56 countries have registered More than a 100 use regularly These institutions actually have access to more journals than the world’s richest medical schools

25. Information flow to developing countries Phase 2 launches on 31 January 2003 Extends to another 42 countries They pay $1000, but the money is kept by WHO to pay for training, connectivity, etc BMJPG makes access to all of its journals free to everybody in the 100 poorest countries in ther world

26. Remaining problems with information flow to developing countries Poor connectivity: unavailable, slow, expensive, often down No training Access only in institutions; aimed mainly at researchers and policy makers Mostly in English

27. Remaining problems with information flow to developing countries Most of the material is not very relevant or useful Need to reach frontline healthcare workers with appropriate material Need to create a culture of reading, learning, debating, and “creating knowledge” How to move from information to knowledge?

28. Initiatives to respond Many initiatives Bid to Gates Foundation (including LSHTM, BMJPG) to pilot a project to supply information to third world partners, prepare locally appropriate material, and disseminate Health Resource Centre in Calabar, Nigeria--connectivity and training

29. Information flow within and from the developing world Generally poor Few resources for research Lack of trained people Many journals but often with very limited resources, untrained, lone editors, and not indexed; no electronic versions Authors send best research to international journals

30. Initiatives to improve information flow within and from the developing world Local indexes and networks--in Latin America WAME (World Association of Medical Editors): offers resources, training, support, contact Regional networks of editors Partnerships with journals from richer countries Future phase of HINARI will be about promoting local publishing

31. Role of international journals like BMJ Provide free electronic access Increase the amount of material relevant to the developing world (still low but doing better) Increase the proportion of authors and reviewers from the developing world Rapid responses and electronic submission systems have helped

32. Role of international journals like BMJ Should we have a special section called “Research from the south”? Should we have a quota or target for the proportion of southern authors? What about local editions of the BMJ? China, South Asia, West Africa. Are these colonial?

33. Four key questions Can the developing world avoid the informaton paradox of the developed world? How to encourage cultures of reading, debating, reseraching, and creating knowledge? How to improve flow of information within the developing world and from the developing world to the richer world? What is the role of journals like the BMJ?