Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

WHY USE IT? It’s big (coverage & time) It’s interdisciplinary It’s free (to you…) It’s only a click away It does some “tricks” that nothing else can do.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "WHY USE IT? It’s big (coverage & time) It’s interdisciplinary It’s free (to you…) It’s only a click away It does some “tricks” that nothing else can do."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 WHY USE IT? It’s big (coverage & time) It’s interdisciplinary It’s free (to you…) It’s only a click away It does some “tricks” that nothing else can do

3

4

5 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Inspec MEDLINE Journal Citation Reports Other stuff we can’t get to because we didn’t pay for it Because it’s too pricey Because we have it in some other platform Other stuff we don’t want to talk about today

6 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Inspec MEDLINE Journal Citation Reports

7 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Inspec MEDLINE Journal Citation Reports

8 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Inspec MEDLINE Journal Citation Reports

9 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Inspec MEDLINE Journal Citation Reports

10 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Inspec MEDLINE Journal Citation Reports

11 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Inspec MEDLINE Journal Citation Reports

12 astronomy electronics communications ergonomics computers & computing computer science control engineering electrical engineering information technology physics

13 Respiratory Monitoring System on the Basis of Capacitive Textile Force Sensors Wireless and batteryless blood pressure sensor Design of wireless sensor system for neonatal monitoring Non-invasive Blood Oxygen Saturation Monitoring for Neonates Using Reflectance Pulse Oximeter Intensive care and Wireless Inspec

14 Patient safety management: RFID technology to improve emergency room medical care quality Process simulation of triage for emergency medicine under huge disaster A Zero-Footprint 3D Visualization System Utilizing Mobile Display Technology for Timely Evaluation of Stroke Patients Use of neural networks to predict adverse outcomes from acute coronary syndrome for male and female patients Inspec Emergency Room Triage

15 Leveraging complex event processing for smart hospitals using RFID No room for error: RFID-enabled smart point-of- care medication process in hospital wards Dual-frequency Active RFID Solution for Tracking Patients in a Children's Hospital An Activity Theory Analysis of RFID in Hospitals Stage implementation of RFID in hospitals Redesigning the replenishment process of medical supplies in hospitals with RFID Inspec RFID in Hospitals

16 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Inspec MEDLINE Journal Citation Reports

17 Radio Waves Equipment Design Product Labeling Automatic Data Processing Patient Identification Systems Computer Aided Design Materials Management Hospital Telemetry MEDLINE

18 Social Responsibility Quality Assurance Health Care Health Care Reform Delivery of Health Care Quality of Health Care Models Organizational Managed Care Programs Primary Health Care MEDLINE

19 Patient Centered Care Models Organizational Hospital Restructuring Efficiency Organizational Total Quality Management Organizational Innovation Patient Satisfaction Delivery of Health Care Integrated MEDLINE

20

21 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Inspec MEDLINE Journal Citation Reports

22 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Inspec MEDLINE Journal Citation Reports

23

24

25

26

27 Cited by…

28

29 Times cited…

30 Which one is better…?

31 Google Scholar’s simplicity may actually be a boon Some institutions cannot afford Web of Science Google Scholar offers some non-periodical sources

32 Google-Scholar is much more clumsy to use, if you’re going to collect (download & analyze) citation data Google-Scholar is valuable for international and different formats

33 Don’t trust Google Scholar to sort properly, detect duplicates, etc.

34 Google scholar looks at non- scholarly sources, and this can be useful, or a distraction

35 Accuracy of Google Scholar is lower… Web of Science is criticized for being American-based, English- language

36 Google Scholar is better at finding citing sources in non- English literature from Africa, Asia and Central and South America.

37 All three tools yielded unique material There’s no simple solution

38 A certain published paper, 2004 … T i m e … 1994 1999 2000 2002 2003 2005 2008 2011 2012

39 ROBIN LARSON ELLIOTT FISHER

40 Robin & Elliott’s paper, 2004 … T i m e … 18 papers, from 2005 to 2011

41

42 Robin & Elliott’s paper, 2004 … T i m e … 40 papers, from 1976 to 2003 18 papers, from 2005 to 2011

43

44 Robin & Elliott’s paper, 2004 … T i m e … 40 papers, from 1976 to 2003 18 papers, from 2005 to 2011

45 8140

46

47

48 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Inspec MEDLINE Journal Citation Reports

49 Web of Knowledge Web of Science Science Citation Index (1899-present) Social Sciences Citation Index (1956- present) Arts & Humanities Citation Index (1975- present)

50

51

52

53

54 # of articles published in the Journal in previous two years How many times were these articles cited this year Impact Factor

55 # of articles published in the Journal in previous two years How many times were these articles cited this year

56 # of articles published in the Journal in previous two years How many times were these articles cited this year Impact Factor

57 Amim, M and Mabe, M (2007) Impact factors: use and abuse

58

59

60

61 Eigenfactor Score Times articles from a journal have been cited over past 5 years – Gives more weight to highly cited journals – Journal self citations are removed – The scores of all JCR journals add up to be 100 Article Influence Score A weighted 5 year impact factor – Normalized so the average influence score = 1 See Eigenfactor.org for more information

62


Download ppt "WHY USE IT? It’s big (coverage & time) It’s interdisciplinary It’s free (to you…) It’s only a click away It does some “tricks” that nothing else can do."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google