1. Laboratory Panels &Tests Discussions (a.k.a. Observation Groups verses Atomic Observations)

2. Option 6 – Compound & Indivis. Statements Specialise Entry into 2 new reference model classes: –Compound Entry Used for panels, and may contain data elements, compound statements or atomic statements; Contains shared context. –Indivisible Entry Used for individual tests, and represent indivisible unit of information about the patient; All context is self-contained or derivable. Pros –Consistent query paths –Identifies indivisible units of information –Allows arbitrary levels of nesting –Allows context derivation rules to be applied Cons / Implications –Requires reference model to be changed –Requires the implementation to ensure atomic statements are complete, and independently queryable

3. Option 6 – Compound & Indivis. Statements INDIVISIBLE ENTRY Hematocrit Result Information Subj:** 7549 ELEMENT: Date**: 27 th June 2013 ELEMENT: Test Name: |Hematocrit| ELEMENT: Result Value: 42% ELEMENT: Interpretation: |Normal| ELEMENT: COMPOUND ENTRY Complete Blood Count Information Subjct: 7549 ELEMENT: Date: 27 th June 2013 ELEMENT: INDIVISIBLE ENTRY Hemoglobin Result Information Subj**: 7549 ELEMENT: Date**: 27 th June 2013 ELEMENT: Test Name:|Hemoglobin| ELEMENT: Result Value: 14.2 g/dL ELEMENT: Interpretation: |Normal| ELEMENT: **: Derived Panel Interpretation: … ELEMENT: I think this example mixes in elements of the physical model and the logical model. I don’t think there is a need to create logical models like this.

4. The Reference Model should allow both of the next two styles of modeling

5. Another example of iso-semantic models INDIVISIBLE ENTRY Hematocrit Result ELEMENT: Test Name: |Hematocrit| ELEMENT: Result Value: 42% Interpretation: |Normal| COMPOUND ENTRY Complete Blood Count Information Subjct: 7549 ELEMENT: Date: 27 th June 2013 ELEMENT: INDIVISIBLE ENTRY Hemoglobin Result ELEMENT: Test Name:|Hemoglobin| ELEMENT: Result Value: 14.2 g/dL Interpretation: |Normal| Panel Interpretation: … ELEMENT:

6. Another example of iso-semantic models INDIVISIBLE ENTRY Patient ABO&Rh Type Information Subj: 7549 Modifier: Date: 27 th June 2013 ELEMENT: Test Name: [ABO&Rh] ELEMENT: Result Value: A Neg ELEMENT: Interpretation: |Normal| ELEMENT: COMPOUND ENTRY Transfusion Reaction INDIVISIBLE ENTRY Unit ABO&Rh Type Information Subj: Unit 1 Modifier: Date: 27 th June 2013 ELEMENT: Test Name:[ABO&Rh] ELEMENT: Result Value: A Pos ELEMENT: Interpretation: |Normal| ELEMENT: Panel Interpretation: … ELEMENT:

7. Modeling Guideline If the contextual element applies to everything in the panel, place the element at the panel level If the contextual element applies to only some items in the panel, place the contextual element in each member of the panel to which it applies

8. Proposed RM for Compound and Indivisible Entries