1. Pei Fan*, Ji Wang, Zibin Zheng, Michael R. Lyu Toward Optimal Deployment of Communication-Intensive Cloud Applications peifan@nudt.edu.cn 1

2. Content Introduction Related work System Architecture Cluster-Based Method Experiments Conclusion and Future Work 2

3. Introduction (1/4) Similar to traditional component-based systems, the cloud service provider need to select a number of cloud nodes to user for deploying a cloud application in a cloud. How to make optimal deployment of cloud applications is a challenging and urgent required research problem. 3

4. Introduction (2/4) There are two types of common cloud applications: computation- intensive and communication-intensive applications Computation-intensive: cloud nodes do not communicate with each other frequently (e.g., BONIC). Ranking-based can select a set of optimal cloud nodes for optimal deployment purpose. Communication-intensive: use ranking-based or other methods selecting optimal cloud nodes for communication-intensive application is not proper, since communication performance between cloud nodes needs to be considered. 4

5. Introduction (3/4) An example Assuming a user wants to deploy a MPI program on a cloud and needs to select two cloud nodes for this MPI application. As illustrated in Figure 1, there are totally four available cloud nodes in the cloud Figure 1. Cloud Node Ranking by Average Response Time If we rank these available node candidates via their average response time, then nodes A and D will be selected as the best performing nodes for the MPI application. However, the response time between A and D is 3 seconds, and not the optimal select. 5

6. Introduction (4/4) The contribution of this paper is two-fold: We identify the critical problem of selecting optimal cloud nodes for communication- intensive cloud applications and propose a clustering-based method to address this problem. Based on our method, optimal cloud nodes can be efficiently and effectively determined for communication-intensive cloud applications. Real-world experiments are conducted to compare our method with other methods. We deploy several well known MPI programs on a real-world cloud, PlanetLab The experimental results show the effectiveness of our proposed approach. 6

7. Related Work Based on the cloud node QoS performance, a number of selection and schedule strategies have been proposed in the recent literature. The major approaches can be divided into three types: Random appraoches (use random methods to select nodes) Ranking or rating approaches (cloud nodes is ranked by the order of QoS performance). Matching approaches (matching algorithms are employed to compare the users’requirements and the QoS values of cloud nodes). 7

8. System Architecture (1/2) The cloud node selection problem as shown in Figure 2: Figure 2. cloud nodes selection 8

9. System Architecture (2/2) The optimal cloud nodes selection framework as shown in Figure 3: Figure 3. cloud nodes selection Architecture Details of steps please see in paper. 9

10. Cluster-Based Method (1/8) Cluster-Based Method designed as a three-phase process: Step 1: Selecting initial centroids Step 2: Clustering Analysis Step 3: Selection Details of these phase are presented in the following. 10

11. Cluster-Based Method (2/8) Select Initial Centroids Choosing proper initial centroids is a key step of the cluster analysis procedure. Although it is easy to choose initial centroids randomly, the cluster results are often poor. In general, in a data space, data objects in lower density area are usually regarded as noise objects. As shown in Figure 3. p 1, p 2 and p 3 are noise points. Figure 3. High and low-density areas 11

12. Cluster-Based Method (3/8) Select Initial Centroids In our approach, we use the response time between two nodes to represent the distance between them. Definition 1: The neighborhood of a cloud node p, denoted by N ( p ), is defined by N ( p )={ q ∊ D|dist(p,q)<DIST }, where DIST is a threshold of response time between two cloud nose. D is a set of existing cloud nodes. dist(p i, p j ) denotes the distance between two cloud nodes. Definition 2: A cloud node p that in the high density ara should satisfy the following condition Num(N(p))>NUMBER Where NUMBER is a threshold of the number of neighborhood nodes. 12

13. Cluster-Based Method (4/8) Select Initial Centroids Let H={y i |1 ≤i ≤m} be the set of cloud node in the high-density areas. The initial centroids will be selected from H. The cloud node which has the largest number of neighbors is selected as the centroid z 1, and should satisfy the following condition: Num(N(z1)) ≥ max{Num(N(y i ))|y i ∈ H}. (1) We select second centroid z 2 is the node that has the greatest distance from z 1, and the third one z 3 has satisfy the below condition: min{dist(z 3, z 1 ), dist(z 3, z 2 )} =max{min{dist(y i, z 1 ), dist(y i, z 2 )}|y i ∈ H}. Similarly, the k th centroid z k needs to satisfy: min{dist(z k, z i )|1 ≤ i < k} =max{min{dist(y j, z i )|1 ≤ i < k}|y j ∈ H}. （ 2 ） 13

14. Cluster-Based Method (5/8) Clustering analysis In our approach, we divide the cloud nodes into different clusters based on the response time between different nodes. The response times between nodes can be represented as an n by n matrix. Figure. 4 response time matrix We use p i to represent the vector of response times from node i to other nodes. i.e., pi = (x i1, x i2,..., x in ). 14

15. Cluster-Based Method (6/8) Clustering analysis A cluster analysis algorithm is designed to divide the cloud nodes into K clusters, denoted by C = {C 1, C 2,..., C K } In our approach, we use the average distance between p i and all the cloud nodes of one cluster to represent the distance between a node and a cluster. The average distance calculate by Eq. (3) (3) where d is the number of cloud nodes in the k-th cluster C k. 15

16. Algorithm 1: The algorithm of cluster analysis 16

17. Cluster-Based Method (8/8) Selection After clustering, these cloud nodes are assigned to different clusters. Therefore, we can select the cluster by the RTT of every cluster that user require. RTT calculated by: (4) After selecting clusters, we can rank the nodes in selected cluster by their performance. perf=λ×calc+(1-λ) ×comm (5) 17

18. Experiments (1/7) Experiment Setup We have deployed our experiments on PlanetLab. Our experimental environment consists of 100 distributed nodes which serve as cloud nodes. The schedule node and database server are also deployed on PlanetLab nodes. The parameter of experiment shown in Table 1. Cluster number4 λ 0.5 DIST 100 ms NUMBER 25 18

19. Experiments (2/7) Experiments Setup In the experiments, we run different cloud node selection approaches for a MPI benchmark, called NASA NPB. To compare the performance of Cluster-based method against other schedule algorithm, we use the following metric via NPB: Makespan: The makespan of a job is defined as the duration between sending out a job and receiving a correct result Throughput: The throughput of a job is defined as the total million operations per second rate (Mop/s) rate over the number of processes. 19

20. Experiments (3/7) Performance Comparison To study the cluster-based method performance, we compare our method with the following four methods: Random: Random-based cloud nodes selection method. RankRes: Ranking cloud nodes with respect to the free memory and CPU time RankComm: Ranking cloud nodes with respect to communication performance. RankAll: ranking cloud nodes with respect to both the computing power and communication ability. 20

21. Table 2 and Table 3 show the running of the different benchmarks. The numbers 8,16 indicate the numbers of the used cloud nodes Experiments (4/7) Table 2. Comparison of makespan Table 3. Comparison of Throughput 21

22. Experiments (5/6) Compare of initial centroids selection method Table 4. Comparison of centroids selection method 22

23. Impact of parameters 1) Impact of Class number: In this section, we will analyze the impact of different number of clusters by vary it from 2 to 10 with the step value 1. Figure.5 shown the results Experiments (6/7) Figure 5. Makespan of different cluster number 23

24. Experiments (7/7) Impact of parameters 1) Impact of λ : We change the value of λ from 0 to 1 with a step value of 0.1. The results shown in Figure 6. Figure 6. Makespan of different λ values 24

25. Conclusion and Future Work In this paper, we propose a clustering-based cloud node selection approach for communication-intensive cloud applications. By taking advantage of the cluster analysis, our approach not only considers the QoS values of cloud nodes, but also considers the relationship (i.e., response time) between cloud nodes. Our future work include consider the topology structure of cloud node, the load balance for cloud nodes and fault tolerant cluster 25

26. Thanks Q&A 26