Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

U.S. EPA Design for the Environment Program NPPR Webinar June 23, 2011 Libby Sommer Environmental Scientist.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "U.S. EPA Design for the Environment Program NPPR Webinar June 23, 2011 Libby Sommer Environmental Scientist."— Presentation transcript:

1 U.S. EPA Design for the Environment Program NPPR Webinar June 23, 2011 Libby Sommer Environmental Scientist

2 2 Contents What is DfE? DfE’s Current Projects Chemical Alternatives Assessments – BPA in Thermal Paper – Flame Retardant Alternatives to DecaBDE – HBCD Alternatives in Foam Insulation – Upcoming Alternatives Assessments Safer Product Labeling Program – Growth in Labeled Products – Enhancements to Labeling Standard – How the DfE Label Drives Development of Chemical Data

3 3 Goals Safer products Safer chemical ingredients is baseline Life cycle impacts are considered Protecting Consumers, Workers, & the Environment Central Elements OPPT technical tools and expertise Multi-stakeholder participation Results Currently, industry partners use more than 700 million pounds of safer chemicals What is DfE?

4 4 DfE’s Current Projects Flame Retardants in PCBs Lithium-ion battery LCA Safer Product Labeling Flame retardant alternatives to decaBDE BPA Alternatives in Thermal Paper This summer: NPEs Alternatives Assessment This fall: Phthalates Alternatives Assessment HBCD Alternatives in Foam Insulation

5 5 What are Chemical Alternatives Assessments? High, Moderate, or Low ratings for: Human health effects Environmental fate and effects Involves wide array of stakeholders Provides information that manufacturers can use to create more sustainable products Helps minimize the potential for unintended consequences by reducing the likelihood of moving to alternatives that could pose a concern

6 6 ES&T Feature Article Lavoie et al. “Chemical Alternatives Assessment: Enabling Substitution to Safer Chemicals.” Environmental Science & Technology 2010 44 (24), 9244-9249

7 7 1) Refine project definition – through research and preliminary stakeholder consultation Consider cost, technical feasibility & availability of alternatives 2) Convene stakeholders 3) Finalize scope & identify potential alternatives 4) Conduct hazard assessment 5) Develop the report 6) Apply the information in decision making Steps to Conducting a Chemical Alternatives Assessment

8 8 DfE Alternatives Assessment (2005): Flame Retardants in Furniture Foam Human Health Hazard Concerns Ecotoxicity Hazard Concerns Environmental Hazard Concerns

9 9 DfE Alternatives Assessments for Priority Chemicals Flame Retardants in PCBs Flame retardant alternatives to decaBDE BPA Alternatives in Thermal Paper This summer: NPEs Alternatives Assessment This fall: Phthalates Alternatives Assessment HBCD Alternatives in Foam Insulation

10 10 Upcoming Milestones – Current AAs BPA in Thermal Paper – Developing draft hazard evaluations – On-going – Post draft report for review & comment – September 2011 – Finalize report & publicize results – December 2011 Alternatives to DecaBDE – Developing draft hazard evaluations – On-going – Post draft report for review & comment – October 2011 – Finalize report & publicize results – February 2012 Alternatives to HBCD – Refining list of functional alternatives – Now

11 11 Requirements for the DfE Label Standard for Safer Cleaning Products – Whole product requirements, such as pH and synergistic effects – Product performance – Audits – Ingredient disclosure Criteria for Safer Ingredients – Surfactants – Solvents – Chelating Agents – Fragrances – Master Criteria (for all other ingredient classes) Partnership Agreement – 3 years Available at www.epa.gov/dfe.

12 12 Growth in Labeled Products

13 13 Greater Transparency & Enhancements to the DfE Standard DfE Standard for Safer Cleaning Products – Written in the format of an ANSI Standard – Stakeholders are listed on the DfE website – Enhancements are posted for public comment Stakeholder group helped propose enhancements. – Auditing – Enhanced packaging requirements – Definitional Improvements – Enhanced VOC requirements – Ingredient communication

14 14 Enhancements – Packaging Requirements based on Sustainable Packaging Coalition Criteria – Is sourced, manufactured, transported, and recycled using renewable energy; – Optimizes the use of renewable or recycled source materials; – Is manufactured using clean production technologies and best practices; – Is made from materials healthful in all probable end-of-life scenarios; – Is physically designed to optimize materials and energy; and – Is effectively recovered and used in biological and/or industrial closed- loop cycles Must attain 25% for partnership and improve over time Restricts heavy metals, BPA, and phthalates

15 15 Enhancements – Auditing & VOCs Auditing – Yearly review On-site audit Paper Audit Partnership renewal VOC Content – Use strictest government criteria Either Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) or California Air Resources Board (CARB)

16 16 Enhancements – Ingredient Communication All ingredients must be listed Non-confidential ingredients – On the bottle, or – An easily accessible location where ingredients can be found (e.g., a place on the formulator’s website) Confidential ingredients, dyes and preservatives -- use a chemical descriptive name Scent ingredients – Can be listed on the label as “Fragrance” – More detailed information must be provided elsewhere e.g., website list of the actual ingredients, or set of chemicals on the IFRA list Example of Acceptable Ingredient Communication

17 17 Marketing Updated web site – sections for institutional purchasers, consumers, and manufacturers Emphasize partner use of the label and promotion of the brand Retailer promotions – Safeway “shelf talkers” highlight the DfE label Direct outreach to consumers – Green Festival – Facebook

18 18 DfE Criteria Drive Development of Safer Chemicals & Data DfE Criteria led to development of safer chemicals – Surfactants (not previously in commerce) which are more rapidly biodegradable – Dow, BASF, Akzo Nobel DfE Criteria have driven development of new test data – Biodegradation – Aquatic toxicity – Carcinogenicity

19 19 Thank you! For more information: Libby Sommer sommer.elizabeth@epa.gov 202-564-1065 For more information: DfE: epa.gov/dfe


Download ppt "U.S. EPA Design for the Environment Program NPPR Webinar June 23, 2011 Libby Sommer Environmental Scientist."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google