1. Martin Luck, Neil Morris, Julian Park, Jon Green, Momna Hejmadi, Cynthia Burek Jennifer Boyd “Bioscience Horizons: The evolution of an International Student Journal” HEA STEM Conference, Edinburgh, April 2014

2. The benefits? Motivator for enthusiastic and able students Publication of valuable research First step on the publication ladder for those considering research Useful addition to graduate’s CV Showcase for junior cohorts…this is what you can achieve. Marketing tool?

3. Existing opportunities Mainstream bioscience journals In house UG journals….Origins, BURN, Biolog-e Cross-disciplinary journals such as “Reinvention” …Warwick, The Plymouth Scientist…. Bioscience Horizons

5. The Bioscience Horizons management team Martin Luck, University of Nottingham (Chair of Management Board) Neil Morris, University of Leeds (Editor in Chief) Julian Park, University of Reading Cynthia Burek, University of Chester Jonathan Green, Univrsity of Birmingham Momna Hejmadi, University of Bath Jennifer Boyd, Oxford University Press

6. Specific objectives of the journal To promote the link between teaching and research in Higher Education To provide a repository of high quality student research which will be useful to other students and staff To provide a forum for students, their supervisors and Universities, to showcase high quality research work To illustrate the student skill base to prospective employers.

7. How has it happened? Publishing agreement with OUP Journal has a website, see www.biohorizons.oxfordjournals.org www.biohorizons.oxfordjournals.org OUP published two e-pilot editions in 2007/08, with hardcopy for publicity 2011/2012 saw major overhaul of the submission process 2013 the journal went International and included taught M-level outputs Supervisors can now be co-authors

9. Where and how many? 64 different HEIs since establishment Papers from 32 different institutions in 2013 32 new papers in 2013, 21 being primary research, 11 reviews Currently – 10 accepted following revision – 3 undergoing minor changes – 11 undergoing major revision – 9 rejected/withdrawn – 8 under review

10. International?

11. The review process International Usually two reviewers Quality, quality, quality Equivalent to “normal” journal review Rejection is common and can be awkward!

12. Are the papers being read?

13. Example titles The effects of immune challenge on locust salivary glands in vitro The thermal biology of lizards in relation to body surface temperature and lizard length. Factors controlling internal initiation of transcription at PRY3 in budding yeast An investigation to determine the variation in marsh orchid (Dactylorhiza) populations at Moses Gate Country Park, Bolton

14. Cited Articles

15. Common queries/issues If it is published in Bioscience Horizons can it be published elsewhere as well? What about authorship? Does the journal have an impact factor? I do not think I can convince colleagues to engage with this The supervisor of our best UG project wants to publish in another journal Are they just like “normal” papers?

16. Successes Next year will be the 7 th volume Financial support from Founder Universities, BBSRC and Professional Societies to keep going Bioscience Horizons was runner up in the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP) Award for Publishing Innovation in 2008 Various publications about the Journal

17. Chairs Prize 2013 Best research paper - Effect of woodstack structure on invertebrate abundance and diversity by Richard Sands Best review paper – mGlu5 as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of fragile X syndrome by Lear Robertson

18. What do the authors think? Bioscience Horizons provided me with a fantastic introduction to the processes involved in publishing scientific research, Michael Goldsworthy, 2008 At an interview my prospective employer searched for my name on the internet, found my publication and offered me the position. Victoria Sebbage 2009 The opportunity gave me confidence in my writing, making the publication of further work less daunting. Sarah-Jane Haig 2011

19. Tips for those considering Clear about your objectives Dedicated team with clear responsibilities Try and work with a publishing house Consider the financial viability Good communication is essential Not everybody will share your enthusiasm!

20. Concluding comments Very high quality papers from very able students Students very enthusiastic about the process We hope as volumes continue to accumulate it will provide a repository of UG excellence for reference Constant awareness raising… On-going sustainability issues You may be asked to review a paper…I hope you will! Contact Bioscience Horizons Editorial Office or the presenters directly