Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Perspectives on USNRC Study Request Nuclear & Radiation Studies Board April 26, 2010 Ralph Andersen, CHP Senior Director – Radiation Safety & Environmental.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Perspectives on USNRC Study Request Nuclear & Radiation Studies Board April 26, 2010 Ralph Andersen, CHP Senior Director – Radiation Safety & Environmental."— Presentation transcript:

1 Perspectives on USNRC Study Request Nuclear & Radiation Studies Board April 26, 2010 Ralph Andersen, CHP Senior Director – Radiation Safety & Environmental Protection

2 Health Physics Society Perspective  Premise: – Epidemiological studies alone will not provide definitive results at low doses and low dose rates  Recommendations: – Do not fund studies with low statistical power – Do not fund studies for which there is insufficient data to properly control for confounding factors  Although such studies do not add scientific knowledge – they may be useful in addressing allegations and concerns about health effects

3 BEIR VII Committee Perspective “In general, additional ecological studies of persons exposed to low levels of radiation from environmental sources are not recommended.” -BEIR VII Phase 2 Report (2006)

4 Challenges with Descriptive (Ecological) Studies  Lack of specific information on individuals within a population (e.g., dose estimates)  Difficulty in adequately addressing confounding factors  Variability in data accuracy and completeness  Population migration or movement  Low statistical power

5 Populations Living Around Nuclear Power Plants (2000 Census Data) Distance  Total – 0-2 miles – 0-5 miles – 0-10 miles  Range (individual plants) – 0-2 miles – 0-5 miles – 0-10 miles Population – 65,239 – 588,667 – 2,795,411 – 0 – 7,694 – 2 – 67,154 – 1,882 – 201,321

6 NPP Programs for Monitoring and Controlling Public Dose  Radiological Effluent Monitoring & Control – Radioactivity in Gaseous & Liquid Effluents – Direct Radiation Exposure – Doses to maximally exposed people (infant, child, teen or adult)  Radiological Environmental Monitoring – Monitoring results for all principal exposure pathways  Land Use Census – Determine maximally exposed people

7 Typical Estimated Maximum Doses to People Living Around NPPs (2000) Dose Type  Gaseous Effluents – Total Body – Organ  Liquid Effluents – Total Body – -Organ Annual Dose (mrem)  ALARA Criteria = 10 – 0.2 – 0.5  ALARA Criteria = 3 – 0.1 – 0.07

8 NRC Public Dose Criteria for ALARA Summary of Appendix I Design Objectives and Dose Criteria Type of Effluent Pathway Organ Dose Limit (per yr per unit) Liquid All total body 3 mrem (0.03 mSv) All any organ 10 mrem (0.1 mSv) Gaseous All total body 5 mrem (0.05 mSv) All skin 15 mrem (0.15 mSv) Radioiodines All any organ 15 mrem (0.15 mSv) Particulates All any organ 15 mrem (0.15 mSv) Gaseous gamma air dose n/a 10 mrad (0.10 mGy)* Beta air dose n/a 20 mrad (0.20 mGy)* Note: * Air doses are expressed in mrad.

9 Recommendations  Assess impact of variability in populations  Assess validity and uncertainty in dose estimate data  Review published literature with regard to validity, limitations and insights  Identify and explain limitations up front  Avoid slicing and dicing of the data


Download ppt "Perspectives on USNRC Study Request Nuclear & Radiation Studies Board April 26, 2010 Ralph Andersen, CHP Senior Director – Radiation Safety & Environmental."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google