1. Terminal node (terminal) (=interior branch) Outgroups

2. Most Recent Common Ancestor of B+C MRCA of A+B+C MRCA of N+A+B+C “basal” to the ingroup

3. Monophyly (monophyletic) Paraphyly (paraphyletic) Polyphyly (polyphyletic)

4. Monophyly Non-monophyly

5. “... is more closely related to...” = “...shares a more recent common ancestor with...”

6. How do we infer phylogeny?

7. time

8. How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

9. 1. Evolutionary systematics -Arose during the Modern Synthesis of Evolution (Ernst Mayr, Theodosius Dobzhansky, G.G. Simpson)

10. 1. Evolutionary systematics -Arose during the Modern Synthesis of Evolution (Ernst Mayr, Theodosius Dobzhansky, G.G. Simpson) -Tried to be synonymous with evolutionary biology & “Neo-Darwinism”

11. 1. Evolutionary systematics -Arose during the Modern Synthesis of Evolution (Ernst Mayr, Theodosius Dobzhansky, G.G. Simpson) -Tried to be synonymous with evolutionary biology & “Neo-Darwinism” -Goal: Think of relationships among organisms as how Natural Selection made them.

12. 1. Evolutionary systematics -Arose during the Modern Synthesis of Evolution (Ernst Mayr, Theodosius Dobzhansky, G.G. Simpson) -Tried to be synonymous with evolutionary biology & “Neo-Darwinism” -Goal: Think of relationships among organisms as how Natural Selection made them. -Very little (if any) methodology or “operationalism” Construct scenarios, but no formal system of theories.

13. 1. Evolutionary systematics -Arose during the Modern Synthesis of Evolution (Ernst Mayr, Theodosius Dobzhansky, G.G. Simpson) -Tried to be synonymous with evolutionary biology & “Neo-Darwinism” -Goal: Think of relationships among organisms as how Natural Selection made them. -Very little (if any) methodology or “operationalism” Construct scenarios, but no formal system of theories. -Difficult to formulate testable hypotheses.

14. 1. Evolutionary systematics -Often only classifications, with little attempt to depict relationships as “trees” (phylogenies). -”Trust the experts”

15. 2. Phenetics -Emphasizes the overall similarity of PHENOtypes in grouping and classifying taxa.

16. 2. Phenetics -Emphasizes the overall similarity of PHENOtypes in grouping and classifying taxa. -Maintains principles of Neo-Darwinism, but NO ESTIMATION OF PROCESSES (e.g., natural sel’n).

17. 2. Phenetics -Emphasizes the overall similarity of PHENOtypes in grouping and classifying taxa. -Maintains principles of Neo-Darwinism, but NO ESTIMATION OF PROCESSES (e.g., natural sel’n). -Largely methodological/operational. NO PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS.

18. 2. Phenetics -Emphasizes the overall similarity of PHENOtypes in grouping and classifying taxa. -Maintains principles of Neo-Darwinism, but NO ESTIMATION OF PROCESSES. -Largely methodological/operational. NO PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS. -Uses any and all data, as long as it can be quantified.

19. 2. Phenetics -Emphasizes the overall similarity of PHENOtypes in grouping and classifying taxa. -Maintains principles of Neo-Darwinism, but NO ESTIMATION OF PROCESSES. -Largely methodological/operational. NO PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS. -Uses any and all data, as long as it can be quantified. -Resulting “trees” called “Phenograms.” Statements of SIMILARITY ONLY. Useful for summarizing resemblence

20. 2. Phenetics: “phenograms”

21. 3. Cladistics/phylogenetics (Hennig)

22. -Founded on principles of Operational Darwinism 3. Cladistics/phylogenetics (Hennig)

23. -Founded on principles of Operational Darwinism 1. Darwinian Evolution= “Descent with modification” 3. Cladistics/phylogenetics (Hennig)

24. -Founded on principles of Operational Darwinism 1. Darwinian Evolution= “Descent with modification” 2. Phylogeny is the result of evolution 3. Cladistics/phylogenetics (Hennig)

25. -Founded on principles of Operational Darwinism 1. Darwinian Evolution= “Descent with modification” 2. Phylogeny is the result of evolution 3. Therefore, focus on derived MODIFICATIONS for evidence of phylogeny. 3. Cladistics/phylogenetics (Hennig)

26. -Founded on principles of Operational Darwinism 1. Darwinian Evolution= “Descent with modification” 2. Phylogeny is the result of evolution 3. Therefore, focus on derived MODIFICATIONS for evidence of phylogeny. -Cladistics uses ONLY shared,derived features to infer phylogeny (Evolutionary Systematics & Phenetics use ALL features). 3. Cladistics/phylogenetics (Hennig)

27. -Founded on principles of Operational Darwinism 1. Darwinian Evolution= “Descent with modification” 2. Phylogeny is the result of evolution 3. Therefore, focus on derived MODIFICATIONS for evidence of phylogeny. -Cladistics uses ONLY shared,derived features to infer phylogeny (Evolutionary Systematics & Phenetics use ALL features). -Need to distinguish ANCESTRAL vs. DERIVED

28. Terms & concepts used in phylogenetics/cladistics CHARACTER: Heritable trait possessed by an organism; characters are usually described in terms of their states, for example: "hair present" vs. "hair absent," where "hair" is the character, and "present" and "absent" are its states.

29. HOMOLOGY: Characters are considered homologous when they are inherited from a common ancestor which possessed that feature. HOMOPLASY: A similar feature shared by two or more taxa that does not meet the criterion (or criteria) of homology. Homoplasies generally arise via convergence. CONVERGENCE: the independent (convergent) evolution of anatomical or functional similarity between unrelated or distantly related lineages or forms. The resulting similarities are only superficial, generally resulting from similar adaptation to similar environments and are NOT a result of common ancestry (and are therefore NOT homologies). Terms & concepts used in phylogenetics/cladistics

30. Bat Bird Pterosaur humerus

31. AnapsidaDiapsida SynapsidaSaurapsida Turtles Lizards & snakes Crocodiles Dinosaurs & birds Mammals & reptile-like mammals Amniota -evolution of cleidoic (shelled) egg; ca. 350 mya Amphibians -ca. 320 mya most recent common ancestor

32. Terms & concepts used in phylogenetics/cladistics APOMORPHY: a derived feature or character; derived from and differing from an ancestral (plesiomorphic) condition. SYNAPOMORPHY: A shared, derived character (apomorphy) reflecting common ancestry used to group taxa. Hair is a synapomorphy of mammals.

33. Terms & concepts used in phylogenetics/cladistics PLESIOMORPHY: An ancestral or primitive character, often incorrectly used to group taxa. SYMPLESIOMORPHY: A plesiomorphy shared by two or more taxa.

34. REMEMBER CHARACTER STATES are primitive or derived. ORGANISMS are not!

35. How do we identify “apomorphic” vs. “plesiomorphic”?

36. 1.Fossil record

37. How do we identify “apomorphic” vs. “plesiomorphic”? 1.Fossil record 2.Ontogeny/embryology e.g., clavicles in deer

38. How do we identify “apomorphic” vs. “plesiomorphic”? 1.Fossil record 2.Ontogeny/embryology e.g., clavicles in deer 3.Outgroup comparison

39. Parsimony Criterion

40. Parsimony: The “rule of simplicity.” Simply stated, according to the principle of Maximum Parsimony, accept the explanation requiring the fewest assumptions. Parsimony is the fundamental assumption of traditional cladistics/phylogenetics.

41. Parsimony Criterion Parsimony: The “rule of simplicity.” Simply stated, according to the principle of Maximum Parsimony, accept the explanation requiring the fewest assumptions. Parsimony is the fundamental assumption of traditional cladistics/phylogenetics. Other criteria: Maximum likelihood; probabilistic criteria (e.g., Bayesian posterior probabilities).

42. Parsimony Criterion In phylogenetics, we use the parsimony criterion to “optimize” (=minimize) the number of transitions (=steps) from one character state to another, for all characters, on every possible tree, and select the tree or trees that require the fewest number of steps (ad hoc hypotheses). We also use parsimony to infer character state transformations and biogeographic history.

43. How many possible trees? Ingroup taxaNumber of trees 11

44. How many possible trees? Ingroup taxa Number of trees 11 21

45. How many possible trees? Ingroup taxa Number of trees 11 21 33

46. How many possible trees? Ingroup taxa Number of trees 11 21 33 5105

47. How many possible trees? Ingroup taxa Number of trees 11 21 33 5105 1034,459,425

48. How many possible trees? Ingroup taxa Number of trees 11 21 33 5105 1034,459,425 502.75292 x 10 76

49. Example HumanMonkeyMouseOutgroup

50. Example HumanMonkeyMouseOutgroup 1. Dense fur:noyes

51. Example HumanMonkeyMouseOutgroup 1. Dense fur:noyes 2. Bipedal:yesno

52. Example HumanMonkeyMouseOutgroup 1. Dense fur:noyes 2. Bipedal:yesno 3. Computer:yesno

53. Example HumanMonkeyMouseOutgroup 1. Dense fur:noyes 2. Bipedal:yesno 3. Computer:yesno 4. Clothes:yesno

54. Example HumanMonkeyMouseOutgroup 1. Dense fur:noyes 2. Bipedal:yesno 3. Computer:yesno 4. Clothes:yesno 5. Long tail:noyes

55. Example HumanMonkeyMouseOutgroup 1. Dense fur:noyes 2. Bipedal:yesno 3. Computer:yesno 4. Clothes:yesno 5. Long tail:noyes 6. Enlarged brain: yes no

56. Example HumanMonkeyMouseOutgroup 1. Dense fur:noyes 2. Bipedal:yesno 3. Computer:yesno 4. Clothes:yesno 5. Long tail:noyes 6. Enlarged brain: yes no Mammal Tree of Life (NSF): 4,500 morphological characters and counting

57. “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.” T. Dobzhansky

58. “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.” T. Dobzhansky “Nothing in evolution makes sense except in the light of phylogeny.” Society of Systematic Biologists