1. 1 PREVENTION THROUGH DESIGN: Sustainable Innovation in Safety Management 36TH ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC MEETING New York/New Jersey Educational Resource Center New York, NY March 20, 2015 T. Michael Toole, PhD, PE Assoc. Dean of Engineering and Professor, Civil and Env. Engineering Bucknell University Based on past presentations with John Gambatese, PhD, PE Professor, Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University

2. DOWNLOAD THIS PRESENTATION NOW FROM WWW.DESIGNFORCONSTRUCTIONSAFETY.ORG 2

3. COURSE DESCRIPTION The presentation will summarize the PtD concept and the ethical and sustainability-related reasons for PtD, provide common examples, and summarize tools and processes that enable PtD. The presentation will conclude with suggestions for how to move forward with implementing PtD in your organization.

4. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Participants will be able to:  Define Prevention through Design (PtD)  Identify common examples of PtD  Describe tools and processes that enable PtD  Summarize steps in implementing PtD in an organization.

5. OVERVIEW  PtD Concept  Motivation  Examples  Leaders  Tools and Processes  Moving forward in your organization Work premises and facilities Tools and equipment Processes Products Work methods and organization of work Prevention through Design = Design for Safety = Safety by Design

6. IMPORTANT MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS UNDERLYING PTD  Sustainability  Collaboration  Innovation and Managing Change 6

7. PREVENTION THROUGH DESIGN (PTD) “Addressing occupational safety and health needs in the design process to prevent or minimize the work- related hazards and risks associated with the construction, manufacture, use, maintenance, and disposal of facilities, materials, and equipment.” (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ptd/)http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ptd/

8. PTD IN CONSTRUCTION IS…  Explicitly considering construction safety in the design of a project.  Being conscious of and valuing the safety of construction workers when performing design tasks.  Making design decisions based in part on a design element's inherent safety risk to construction workers. “Safety Constructability”

9. WHY PTD? ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENTS IN U.S.  Nearly 200,000 serious injuries  Nearly 1,000 deaths

10. WHY PTD? DESIGN-SAFETY LINKS  22% of 226 injuries that occurred from 2000- 2002 in Oregon, WA, and CA 1  42% of 224 fatalities in US between 1990- 2003 1  60% of fatal accidents resulted in part from decisions made before site work began 2  63% of all fatalities and injuries could be attributed to design decisions or lack of planning 3 1 Behm, M., “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety Concept” (2005) 2 European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions 3 NSW WorkCover, CHAIR Safety in Design Tool, 2001

11. WHY PTD? PROFESSIONAL ETHICS  National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) Code of Ethics:  Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public.  American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Code of Ethics:  Engineers shall recognize that the lives, safety, health and welfare of the general public are dependent upon engineering decisions ….

12. WHY PTD? SUSTAINABILITY

13. PTD’S TIE TO SUSTAINABILITY  Definition of Sustainable Development in Brundtland Commission Report (1987)  Focus on people as much as on the environment  Meet the needs of people who can’t speak for themselves 13

14. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES  “ Commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development;  “Improve quality of life of the local community and society at large.”  “Improve quality of life of the workforce and their families; Source: World Business Council for Sustainable Development 14

15. CSR: SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT  Supplier social equity  Anti-Sweatshop movement  Fair Trade  Bangladesh factory collapse 15

16. SUSTAINABILITY IS NOT JUST BEING GREEN 16

17. PTD AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY/EQUITY  Do not our duties include minimizing all risks that we have control over?  Do we not have the same duties for construction, maintenance, line workers as for the “public”?  Is it ethical to create designs that are not as safe as they could (practically) be?

18. DESIGN HAS MAJOR LEVERAGE  The Right thing to do and…  The Smart thing to do 18

19. WHY PTD? BANG FOR THE BUCK  Ability to influence safety is greatest early in the project schedule during planning and design (Szymberski, 1997)

20. HIERARCHY OF CONTROLS Reliability of Control Elimination Eliminate the hazard during design Substitution Substitute a less-hazardous material or form during design Engineering Controls “Design-in” engineering controls, Incorporate warning systems Administrative Controls Well-designed work methods & organization PPE Available, effective, easy to use PtD Lower Higher

21. WHY PTD? TANGIBLE BENEFITS  Reduced site hazards  Fewer worker injuries and fatalities  Reduced workers’ compensation premiums  Increased productivity and quality  Fewer delays due to accidents  Encourages designer-constructor collaboration  Improved operations/maint. safety

22. OVERVIEW  PtD Concept  Motivation  Examples  Leaders  Tools and Processes  Moving forward in your organization Work premises and facilities Tools and equipment Processes Products Work methods and organization of work

23. EXAMPLE OF THE NEED FOR PTD  Design spec:  Dig groundwater monitoring wells at various locations.  Wells located directly under overhead power lines.  Accident:  Worker electrocuted when his drill rig got too close to overhead power lines.  Engineer could have:  specified wells be dug away from power lines; and/or  better informed the contractor of hazard posed by wells’ proximity to powerlines through the plans, specifications, and bid documents.

24. PTD EXAMPLE: ANCHORAGE POINTS

25. PTD EXAMPLE: ROOFS AND PERIMETERS Skylights Upper story windows Parapet walls

26. PTD EXAMPLE: PREFABRICATION Steel Stairs Concrete Wall Panels Concrete Segmented Bridge

27. Detailing Guide for the Enhancement of Erection Safety Published by the National Institute for Steel Detailing and the Steel Erectors Association of America PTD EXAMPLE: STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN

28. The Erector Friendly Column  Include holes in columns at 21” and 42” for guardrail cables and at higher locations for fall protection tie-offs  Locate column splices and connections at reasonable heights above floor Photo: AISC educator ppt

29.  Provide enough space for making connections

30.  Know approximate dimensions of necessary tools to make connections Photo: AISC educator ppt

31. OVERVIEW  PtD Concept  Motivation  Examples  Leaders  Tools and Processes  Moving forward in your organization Work premises and facilities Tools and equipment Processes Products Work methods and organization of work

32. URS CORP. PTD PROCESS

33. DFCS IN PRACTICE: OWNERS  USACE  ExxonMobil  MWCS  Intel  BHP Billiton  Southern Co.  Sutter Health

34. USACE FACILITY SYSTEMS SAFETY To incorporate systems safety engineering and management practices into a facility life cycle process used in the conceptual phase, planning stages, construction of facilities, and facility reduction (demolition).

35. FASS Budget Established FASS Training SOH/Designers FASS #2 Goal for USACE Create FASS Procedures (QMS) Create FASS Program Manual Create a FASS Pilot Program at one Districts Review Design Draws with FASS Create a Second FASS Pilot Program Review Progress with FASS Pilot Programs FASS Mandatory Training to all Employees FACILITY SYSTEMS SAFETY PATH FORWARD FY 20042007 - PresentFY 2011 - 2012FY 2012 FY 2015 Implement a FASS Contract to conduct reviews FY 2013 FY 2014 Implement FASS Across USACE FY 2015 FY 2016FY 2016/2017

36. INTEL’S PROBLEM: ACCESS TO UTILITIES Original design: Trench below equipment

37. INTEL’S SOLUTION: NEW FULL BASEMENT

38. BHP BILLITON’S PTD INITIATIVES  PtD staff embedded in procurement and design  PtD in technical specifications  Required designer PtD training  Design reviews includes 3D models 38

39. SOUTHERN CO.’S DESIGN CHECKLISTS

40. NATIONAL INITIATIVES AND ACTIVITIES  NIOSH  PtD National Initiative  PtD Workshops: July 2007 and August 2011  NORA Construction Sector Council CHPtD Workgroup  OSHA Construction Alliance Roundtable  ANSI/ASSE PtD Standard (Z590.3-2011)

41. OVERVIEW  PtD Concept  Motivation  Examples  Leaders  Tools and Processes  Moving forward in your organization Work premises and facilities Tools and equipment Processes Products Work methods and organization of work

42. PTD DESIGN REVIEW  Hazard identification  What construction safety hazards does the design create?  Risk assessment  What is the level of safety and health risk associated with each hazard?  Design option identification and selection  What can be done to eliminate or reduce the risk?  Remember the hierarchy of controls……hierarchy of controls

43. PTD TOOL – DESIGN RISK ASSESSMENT 43 www.constructionsliderule.org

44. PTD PROCESS Get the right people talking about the right things at the right time! 44 www.seagrave.com/

45. PTD PROCESS

46. CHAIR SAFETY IN DESIGN TOOL Begin Concept Design Commence Construction CHAIR-2 CHAIR-3 Project Phase CHAIR-1 Review of Concept Design Review of Detailed Design Construction Hazard Assessment and Implication Review (CHAIR) (Source: NSW WorkCover, CHAIR Safety in Design Tool, 2001)

49. PTD TOOLS – BIM AND VISUALIZATION 49

50. PTD INFORMATION SOURCES www.designforconstructionsafety.org

51. OVERVIEW  PtD Concept  Motivation  Examples  Leaders  Tools and Processes  Moving forward in your organization Work premises and facilities Tools and equipment Processes Products Work methods and organization of work

52. THREE STEPS TOWARDS PTD 1. Establish a lifecycle safety culture 2. Establish enabling processes 3. Team with organizations who value lifecycle safety CultureProcessesPartners

53. ESTABLISH A LIFECYCLE SAFETY CULTURE  Instill the right safety values  Secure management commitment  Training  Confirm Life Cycle Costing criteria  Ensure recognition that designing for safety is the smart thing to do and the right thing to do 1. Professional Codes of Ethics 2. Payoff data

54. ESTABLISH ENABLING PROCESSES  Designer training and tools  Qualifications-based contracting  Negotiated or Cost-Plus contracting  Collaborative decision processes  IPD or enabled safety constructability input

55. SUTTER HEALTH’S IPD PROCESS  Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) facilitates collaboration of design and construction professionals during design  Co-located  Processes and norms for candid feedback  Trust  Sufficient time  Life cycle costing criteria  Common success criteria

56. CHOOSE YOUR PARTNERS WISELY  PtD capability in designer RFP  Designer interaction experience in GC RFP  Consider Design-Builders with industrial and international project experience  Collaborative culture and experiences  Open to change

57. PTD: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU AND YOUR FIRM  All organizational change starts with individual initiative  Will you be a leader or a laggard? 57 www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public- health-textbook/disease-causation- diagnostic/2h-principles-health- promotion/prevention-paradox

58. INITIATING PTD IN YOUR ORGANIZATION  Leadership  Sustainability  Ethics  Innovation  Change management 58

59. SUMMARY  PtD is tied with sustainability, CSR, ethics  Successful organizations have implemented PtD  Keys to implementing PtD  Life cycle cost perspective and budgeting  Systems thinking  Contracts facilitate collaboration  Three first steps to implementing PtD  Culture, Processes, Partners  You can be a leader in implementing PtD in your organization

60. Mike Toole ttoole@bucknell.edu www.designforconstructionsafety.org THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME!