Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Increasing the impact of publications: self-archiving and eScholar Dr Phil Butler, Steve McIndoe, Samantha Aston The University of Manchester Research.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Increasing the impact of publications: self-archiving and eScholar Dr Phil Butler, Steve McIndoe, Samantha Aston The University of Manchester Research."— Presentation transcript:

1 Increasing the impact of publications: self-archiving and eScholar Dr Phil Butler, Steve McIndoe, Samantha Aston The University of Manchester Research Staff Conference, 11th May 2010

2 What is self-archiving?

3 “Self-archiving involves … depositing a free copy of a digital document... in the author’s institutional repository...”

4 What is an institutional repository?

5 Manchester eScholar is … a locus for individuals to manage, disseminate and share their scholarly work

6 Manchester eScholar is … a place to store and preserve intellectual assets

7 Manchester eScholar is … a catalogue of research outputs

8 Technology a.sustainable, scaleable storage ~15,000 items per year b.future-sensitive e.g. primary research data c.metadata + full-text d.indefinite preservation

9 Dissemination a.search engines b.faculty, school, personal websites c.richer content

10 Why self- archive? more dissemination and sharing of scholarly work Self-archiving in Manchester eScholar means...

11 Why self- archive? more dissemination and sharing of scholarly work better storage and preservation of intellectual assets Self-archiving in Manchester eScholar means...

12 Why self- archive? more dissemination and sharing of scholarly work better storage and preservation of intellectual assets easier cataloguing of research outputs Self-archiving in Manchester eScholar means...

13 Why self- archive? Self-archiving in Manchester eScholar means... easier access, better usage, greater impact of your research...

14 There are risks … many are myths open access Self-archiving DOES NOT mean...

15 There are risks … many are myths open access less peer review Self-archiving DOES NOT mean...

16 There are risks … many are myths open access less peer review more piracy Self-archiving DOES NOT mean...

17 There are risks … many are myths open access less peer review more piracy more work Self-archiving DOES NOT mean...

18 There are risks … many are myths open access less peer review more piracy more work more SPAM Self-archiving DOES NOT mean...

19 What are your self-archiving options? Option 1.Lite-cite submission (not recommended) Option 2.Key metadata Option 3.Option 2 + supplementary metadata Option 4.Option 2 + full-text pre-peer review (draft), post-peer review (non-publishers document), post-peer review (publishers document) Option 5.Option 2 + supplementary files

20 What are your self-archiving options? Option 1.Lite-cite submission (not recommended) Option 2.Key metadata Option 3.Option 2 + supplementary metadata Option 4.Option 2 + full-text pre-peer review (draft), post-peer review (non-publishers document), post-peer review (publishers document) Option 5.Option 2 + supplementary files

21 What are your self-archiving options? Option 1.Lite-cite submission (not recommended) Option 2.Key metadata Option 3.Option 2 + supplementary metadata Option 4.Option 2 + full-text pre-peer review (draft), post-peer review (non-publishers document), post-peer review (publishers document) Option 5.Option 2 + supplementary files

22 What are your self-archiving options? Option 1.Lite-cite submission (not recommended) Option 2.Key metadata Option 3.Option 2 + supplementary metadata Option 4.Option 2 + full-text pre-peer review (draft), post-peer review (non-publishers document), post-peer review (publishers document) Option 5.Option 2 + supplementary files

23 What are your self-archiving options? Option 1.Lite-cite submission (not recommended) Option 2.Key metadata Option 3.Option 2 + supplementary metadata Option 4.Option 2 + full-text pre-peer review (draft), post-peer review (non-publishers document), post-peer review (publishers document) Option 5.Option 2 + supplementary files

24 Who wants you to self-archive? Many of your colleagues in rival institutions Most UK research councils The University Who doesn’t want you to self- archive?

25 Manchester 2015 Goal Two – World Class Research “… among 25 strongest research universities … on commonly accepted criteria …”

26 Manchester research is under threat - ARWU Aug 09 [http://www.arwu.org]

27

28 Southampton University – ranked 25 th in the World, 3 rd in the UK

29 RPE, REF

30 The self-archiving effect – an individual’s experience, Ray L Frost, QUT

31

32 Manchester eScholar - evolving services Electronic theses Content search, display and reporting services Post RPE’09 improvements Metadata curation and enhancement

33 Questions? www.manchester.ac.uk/escholar

34 Drivers and barriers to self-archiving: an ongoing debate?


Download ppt "Increasing the impact of publications: self-archiving and eScholar Dr Phil Butler, Steve McIndoe, Samantha Aston The University of Manchester Research."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google