Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Implementation Workgroup: Current Activities and Next Steps.

Published byTierra Hilbun Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Implementation Workgroup: Current Activities and Next Steps."— Presentation transcript:

1 Implementation Workgroup: Current Activities and Next Steps

2 Member List Elizabeth Johnson, Co-Chair, Tenet Healthcare Corp. Cris Ross, Co-Chair, Mayo Clinic Robert Anthony, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Robert Barker, NextGen Healthcare Kevin Brady, NIST Anne Castro, BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina Simon P. Cohn, Kaiser Permanente Tim Cromwell,Veterans Affairs John Derr, Golden Living, LLC Carol Diamond, Markle Foundation Timothy Gutshall, Iowa HIT Regional Extension Center Joseph Heyman, Whittier IPA David Kates, NAVINET Tim Morris, Emory University Nancy Orvis, Department of Defense Steven Palmer, Texas Health/Human Services Commission Wes Rishel, Gartner, Inc. Kenneth Tarkoff, RelayHealth John Travis, Cerner Micky Tripathi, MA eHealth Collaborative Ex-Officio Aneesh Chopra, Chief Technology 2

3 Overview Test Scenario Development 2014 Test Methods Timeline 2014 Test Methods: Public Review and Comment IWG Next Steps 3

4 Unit Based Test Procedures Current Test Procedures employ a unit based testing module where each criteria is tested individually. Testing data nor results are forwarded onto any other tests for that product Development Methodology: Unit Based Testing 4

5 Development Methodology Scenario Based Test Procedures Proposed Test Procedures will employ scenario based testing where results and data is forwarded onto test for that product Development Methodology: Scenario Based Testing 5

6 Development Methodology Scenario Based Test Procedures Scenario Based Test Procedures will be modularly developed so that individual tests can be skipped for products which do not have that capability Development Methodology: Scenario Based Testing 6

7 Test Scenario Development Development Approach –Reflects a typical clinical workflow in multiple care settings –Allows persistence of data elements Provides a model for data threading between different certification criterion and various destinations within an EHR –Maintains testing flexibility (e.g. add/remove “unit test”) Types –Medication Management– Outpatient –Emergency Department– Inpatient 7

8 Test Scenario Development Process –Develop clinically plausible workflow –Current Testing Scenarios based on 2011 Edition Certification Criteria –Reevaluate against 2014 Edition Certification Criteria 8

9 Test Scenario Example PDF of Medication Management Test Scenario Review 9

10 Findings Scenario-based testing can be used to test EHRs Complexities in specific individual tests and testing data will yield difficulty in scenario testing Complexity, and cost-benefit will be evaluated further to determine next steps 10

11 2014 Test Method Timeline OCTNOVAUGSEPTDEC JAN Public Comment Period Technical Workshop (public) 11/13/12 – 11/15/12 8/23/2012 9/711/15 W2 W3 W4 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 W5 10/17 W1 9/7 9/21 W2 9/149/28 W3 9/21 10/5 W4 9/28 10/12 W5 10/1710/31 Test Procedures Revised 9/21 11/30 2014 Test Procedures Posted 12/14/2012 LRI 10/31 LRI 10/3111/14 National Coordinator Approval 12/3 12/7 10/5 A1 10/510/19 12/712/14 2014 Scope Expansion for ACBs and ATLs DRAFT Workshop 12/14/2012 2014 Certification Begins 1/2/201 A2 10/31 12/1 10/2/12 – 10/4/12 Technical Workshop (ATL/ACB) Test Scenarios Reviewed/revised 12/7 On-going 2014 Test Method Timeline 11

12 2014 Test Method (TPs, TD, TTs) Public Comment: Wave 1 Release Date: 9/7/2012 (Comment Period: 9/7/12 – 9/21/12) –170.314(a)(1)Computerized provider order entry –170.314(a)(4)Vital signs, body mass index, and growth charts. –170.314(a)(5)Problem List –170.314(a)(6)Medication List –170.314(a)(7)Medication allergy list –170.314(a)(10)Drug formulary checks –170.314(a)(11)Smoking status –170.314(a)(15)Patient-specific education resources –170.314(a)(17)Inpt setting only - advance directives –170.314(d)(5)Automatic log-off –170.314(d)(8)Integrity –170.314(d)(9)Optional-accounting of disclosures –170.314(f)(1)Immunization Information –170.314(f)(2)Transmission to immunization registries –170.314(f)(2)TOOL ONLY - Immunization Registry (IIS) 12

13 2014 Test Method (TPs, TD, TTs) Public Comment: Wave 2 Release Date: 9/14/2012 (Comment Period: 9/14/12 – 9/28/12) –170.314(a)(3)Demographics –170.314(a)(9)Electronic notes –170.314(a)(13)Family health history –170.314(a)(14)Patient list creation –170.314(d)(6)Emergency access –170.314(f)(5)Amb setting only—cancer case information –170.314(f)(6)Amb setting only—transmission to cancer registries –170.314(f)(6)TOOL ONLY - CDA Validation (Cancer Registry) 13

14 IWG Next Steps Test Scenarios –Incorporate 2014 Certification Criteria –Review against 2014 Test Procedures 2014 Test Procedures –Provide input on the draft Test Procedures 14

Download ppt "Implementation Workgroup: Current Activities and Next Steps."

Similar presentations

Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange

Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
1 HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup: Reformatted Standards Recommendations & Implementation Guidance Dixie Baker, SAIC Steven Findlay,

1 HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup: Reformatted Standards Recommendations & Implementation Guidance Dixie Baker, SAIC Steven Findlay,
HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup Recommendations for Electronic Health Record (EHR) Query of Provider Directories Dixie Baker, Chair.

HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup Recommendations for Electronic Health Record (EHR) Query of Provider Directories Dixie Baker, Chair.
2014 Edition Test Scenarios January 2013. Contents Purpose of Test Scenarios3 Completed Work4 Current Work5 Using a Narrative Test Case Scenario to Develop.

2014 Edition Test Scenarios January Contents Purpose of Test Scenarios3 Completed Work4 Current Work5 Using a Narrative Test Case Scenario to Develop.
HITSC Clinical Quality Workgroup Jim Walker March 27, 2012.

HITSC Clinical Quality Workgroup Jim Walker March 27, 2012.
HIT Standards Committee Implementation Workgroup Judy Murphy, Aurora Health Care, Co-Chair Liz Johnson, Tenet Healthcare, Co-Chair August 17, 2011 1.

HIT Standards Committee Implementation Workgroup Judy Murphy, Aurora Health Care, Co-Chair Liz Johnson, Tenet Healthcare, Co-Chair August 17,
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.

Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Menu Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Core Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated.

2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Menu Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Core Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated.
Liz Johnson Christopher Ross Implementation Workgroup August 22, 2013.

Liz Johnson Christopher Ross Implementation Workgroup August 22, 2013.
1 HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup: Recommendations Dixie Baker, SAIC Steven Findlay, Consumers Union August 20, 2009.

1 HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup: Recommendations Dixie Baker, SAIC Steven Findlay, Consumers Union August 20, 2009.
HIT Standards Committee Implementation Workgroup Liz Johnson, Tenet Healthcare, Co-Chair Judy Murphy, Aurora Health Care, Co-Chair January 12, 2011.

HIT Standards Committee Implementation Workgroup Liz Johnson, Tenet Healthcare, Co-Chair Judy Murphy, Aurora Health Care, Co-Chair January 12, 2011.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report Jamie Ferguson, Chair Kaiser Permanente John Halamka, Co-chair Harvard Medical School 21 July,

HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report Jamie Ferguson, Chair Kaiser Permanente John Halamka, Co-chair Harvard Medical School 21 July,
Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,

Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,
HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup: Standards for Consumer Engagement Dixie Baker, SAIC Steve Findlay, Consumers Union May 26, 2010.

HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup: Standards for Consumer Engagement Dixie Baker, SAIC Steve Findlay, Consumers Union May 26, 2010.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.

Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.

MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.

Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google