Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Understanding organism energy allocations in response to climate change – ideas for approaches to ‘systems biology’ modelling? Chris Hauton.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Understanding organism energy allocations in response to climate change – ideas for approaches to ‘systems biology’ modelling? Chris Hauton."— Presentation transcript:

1 Understanding organism energy allocations in response to climate change – ideas for approaches to ‘systems biology’ modelling? Chris Hauton

2 Issues of climate change – 1) CO 2, CH 4 and temperature based on: Petit et al. (1999) Nature, 399: 429-436

3 Issues of climate change – 2) warming and salinity change Durack & Wijffels (2010) J. Climate doi: 10.1175/2010JCLI3377.1 (pss/50-years)freshwater flux (m 3 yr -1 )

4 Issues of climate change – 3) CO 2 and seawater acidification ‘the other CO 2 problem’ Doney et al. (2009) Annual Reviews - Marine Science, 1 CO 2 (g)  CO 2 (aq) CO 2 (aq) + H 2 O (aq)  HCO 3 - (aq) + H + (aq) CaCO 3 (s)  Ca 2+ (aq) + CO 3 2- (aq) H + (aq) + CO 3 2- (aq)  HCO 3 - (aq) 3a) bicarbonate buffering… carbonate dissolution…

5 Issues of climate change – 3) CO 2 and seawater acidification ‘the other CO 2 problem’ from Pörtner et al. (2004) 3b) disruption to acid base balance in osmoconformers

6 Issues of climate change – 3) CO 2 and seawater acidification ‘the other CO 2 problem’ 3b) disruption to acid base balance in osmoconformers (Hauton et al., 2009)

7 Issues of climate change – 3) CO 2 and seawater acidification ‘the other CO 2 problem’ 3a) reduced availability of carbonate ions causing a reduction in calcification (Riebesell, 2000; Sciandra et al., 2003; Gazeau et al. 2007) but species/experimental differences? (Iglesias-Rodriguez et al., 2008) 3b) direct impact on the intracellular pH (pHi) of many species (Seibel & Walsh, 2003), impacting normal protein synthesis (Kwast & Hand, 1996), respiratory function (Spicer & Taylor, 1994; Pörtner et al., 2004) and immune function (Bibby et al., 2008) disruption to the physiology and performance of marine species (Kurihara et al., 2004; Berge et al., 2006; Spicer et al., 2007)

8 All estimates are subject to uncertainty; variation with region, latitude and depth (IPCC Fourth Assessment Report) –  T of +2 to +4 o C –  pH of -0.4 to -0.5 units –  S of -0.05 psu Issues of climate change – predictions by 2100? However… coastal and estuarine environments extremely variable species which may have evolved strategies to accommodate extreme episodic low pH Ringwood & Keppler, 2002 Attrill et al., 1999

9 Requirements for modelling –stakeholders and policy makers require predictions –research efforts must be directed towards outputs which have stakeholder relevance –large-scale EU and UK research programmes have a significant component for integrating predictive models at different levels of biological organization

10 Existing approaches – ecosystem models European Regional seas Ecosystem Model version run by PML tends to treat organisms as black boxes efforts to refine this to reflect the different performance of different species keystone species and ecosystem engineers requires inputs from organism life history models

11 Existing approaches – life history models Adult Size 1 Adult Size 2 Adult Size 3 Juvenile Larval pool Losses to the system from: mortality, predation, hydrodynamics, etc –essentially concerned with reproductive output to predict numbers –do not consider organism performance as such (e.g. how active is a bioturbating species?) –need input from organism physiology models

12 Existing approaches – organism physiology models (1) Scope for growth (Bayne & Newell, 1983) SFG = A - (R + U) Scope for growth = assimilation – (respiration + excretion) expressed in terms of energy (calories or joules) A = C – [(C x %L/100) + L0 + F] R = O 2 consumed (ml O 2 consumed. day -1 ) U= ammonia excretion (ammonia-N in g.l -1 ) calorific conversions for R and U are available from the literature Saoud & Anderson, 2004 Litopenaeus setiferus

13 SFG models are regarded as ‘net production models’ –empirically determined sequence for nutrition and resource allocation based on allometry –assume that assimilated energy is immediately available for maintenance, the rest is used for growth or stored as reserves Dynamic energy budget (DEB) models (Kooijman, 2000) from Muller et al. (2010) Existing approaches – organism physiology models (2) DEB models –assimilated energy is stored in reserves which are then used for maintenance, growth, development and reproduction –do not use allometric relationships, feeding rate is proportional to surface area, maintenance scales to body volume –‘aim’ is for a generic theory of energy budgets

14 Existing approaches – organism physiology models (2) (DEB) models for the Pacific oyster (Pouvreau et al., 2006)

15 Existing approaches – organism physiology models (2) (DEB) models incorporating infection in Manila clams Rudtiapes philippinarum (Flye-Sainte-Marie et al., 2009)

16 Existing approaches – organism physiology models (2) (DEB) models incorporating heavy metal pollution in bivalves (Muller et al., 2010)

17 Existing approaches – organism physiology models (2) (DEB) models (oyster Crassostrea gigas model in STELLA™)

18 Organism life history Integration of existing models Organism physiology Ecosystem model So what is the issue?

19 Limitation of DEB and SFG models (1) – a personal view Ecosystem model 1) measurements of the impacts of perturbation in pCO 2, temperature and salinity are revealing sub-lethal changes in processes within ‘somatic maintenance’ e.g. acid base balance, protein turnover, osmoregulation, immune function

20 Limitation of DEB and SFG models (1) – a personal view Ecosystem model 1) measurements of the impacts of perturbation in pCO 2, temperature and salinity are revealing sub-lethal changes in processes within ‘somatic maintenance’ e.g. acid base balance, protein turnover, osmoregulation, immune function 2) some are (presently) unpredictable or not intuitive, but will have an impact on an organism performance when additional factors (e.g. pathogens) are added to the environment 3) current models, despite intentions, appear species or condition specific – a parsimonious solution is desired which accounts for all environmental perturbation and which is truly generically applicable

21 Limitation of DEB and SFG models (2) – a personal view Ecosystem model 4) at critical life stages (e.g. larvae, juveniles) or in some species (polychaetes, small crustaceans or gastropods) only certain types of physiological measurements are possible - protein expression, gene expression, enzyme activities, rates of protein turnover - there is no convention on converting these to energy equivalents - a need to cope with rates and proportions or relative quantities?

22 Summary –an end user need to predict the effects of future scenarios on marine ecosystems –working towards this by developing our understanding of organism physiology from laboratory studies and small-scale lab and field mesocosm experiments –results indicate non linear and indirect effect of perturbations from temperature and pCO 2, acting in isolation and synergy –have yet to incorporate in these experiments issues such as infection, pollution or salinity as multiplexed drivers –reliance on integrated modelling from organism physiology to life history and thence ecosystem models –the challenge of incorporating disparate and high resolution datasets (which are planned or being collected) into organism level models (DEB or SFG) or alternatives… (process algebra?) –a need to be generic


Download ppt "Understanding organism energy allocations in response to climate change – ideas for approaches to ‘systems biology’ modelling? Chris Hauton."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google