1. Media and Privacy An Opinion Essay
Enda Tuomey

2. Outline of Steps Vocabulary Ideas/examples for Ideas/examples against
Introduction
Body
Conclusion

3. Essay Question
Do the media treat famous people unfairly? Should famous people be given more privacy? Is publicity about their private lives the price VIPs must pay for fame?

4. Step 1: Vocabulary Circle the important words in the question.
Write down as many related words as you can
If the word is a verb, write the noun form
If the word is a noun, write the verb form
Write words with a similar meaning
Write words with an opposite meaning
Break down generalizations like “media,” “people”

5. Vocabulary

6. Vocabulary 2
Media: newspapers, magazines, Hello magazine, television, radio, internet, Hollywood, paparazzi, photographers, zoom lens, scoop, exclusive, prestige
Famous people: stars, celebrities, VIPS, dignitaries, politicians, leaders, show business, glitterati, models, businessmen
Fair: public have a right to know, stars need publicity, stars give us hope, something to dream about, investigative journalism, private life should reflect public life, models for society

7. Vocabulary 3
Unfairly: with dignity, too much pressure, too much interference, loss of respect, loss of dignity, demeaning, in a cage, crazy
Privacy: security, private life, family life, effect on relationships, effect on children, guards, compounds, virtual prison, masks, tinted windows, secrets, news blackouts,
Fame: rumors, gossip, stories, sensationalist journalism, libel, lies

8. Step 2: Ideas and examples
Start grouping words and phrases to make ideas
You need 3 ideas for the topic (agreeing with the topic) and 3 against (disagreeing)
Have some examples for each idea

9. Ideas/examples: Media are fair (1)
We pay these people’s salaries
We have a choice not to buy papers with rubbishy stories
Media only give us what we want - they don’t create the demand
Most VIPS get rich because of the media - they cannot turn it off just because they don’t like it
If you don’t want a public life, don’t become famous

10. Ideas/examples: Media are fair (2)
The public needs to know about corrupt politicians and businessmen
Many VIPs are role models. They should have good standards in both private AND public life
The media can focus on positive role models

11. Ideas/examples: Media are unfair (1)
Diana - chased to her death by photographers?
Michael Jackson - already judged guilty by media?
Clinton - unable to function as US President due to private life?
Beckham - children will never have normal lives
Only in some countries: not allowed in others
Ordinary people often not interested: media hype

12. Ideas/examples: Media are unfair (2)
Newspapers exist to make money - they just appeal to the lowest standard in us
Media can drive celebrities crazy
Too much attention can distract the celebrity from his or her real talent or work

13. Introductions Two kinds of introductions: Both kinds have 3 sentences:
Situation (some places vs. other places, past vs. present)
Opinion (some people think vs. others think)
Both kinds have 3 sentences:
One side
Other side
Thesis (This essay will…)

14. Introduction A: (Past and Present)
One side: Before newspapers, television, and the internet, ordinary people were not exposed to endless stories about pop singers, princesses, and politicians.
Other side: Today however, we are bombarded with information about who is dating whom, where they eat, and what they wear at their weddings.
Thesis: Do we really need this information? This essay will discuss if famous people should have privacy or not.

15. Introduction B: (Two Opinions)
One side: Most ordinary people respect the rights of others to a private life.
Other side: However, some people are obsessed with celebrities and VIPS. They want to know everything about them, and have an insatiable desire for more information.
Thesis: This essay will discuss whether newspapers and TV should show us intimate details of famous people’s lives.

16. Introduction C: (Two Places)
One side: In some parts of the world, privacy is very important, even for VIPs.
Other side: However, in the US and many other countries, the personal life and family life of many famous people is public property.
Thesis: This essay will discuss whether newspapers and TV should show us intimate details of famous people’s lives.

17. Step 2: Layout Use four paragraphs Introduction 3 sentences
Body (agree or disagree) 7 sentences
Body (disagree or agree) 7 sentences
Conclusion 3 sentences
This is a total of 20 sentences, at 12 words per sentence – about 240 words

18. Body There are two paragraphs in the body
agree disagree
disagree agree
Each paragraph starts with a topic sentence

19. Body (One side: media should not interfere)
Famous people deserve privacy and respect. First of all, we should admire what they do, not who they are. If someone is a famous singer or footballer, we should enjoy their talent on the pitch or at a concert, but we should not invade their family or private life through the media. Secondly, the children and family of famous people should not be affected. Some stars have to hire security for their children or spouses because of media attention. Another point is that too much attention can affect celebrities. They begin to act strangely and lose touch with reality.

20. Body (Other side; media should examine VIP lives)
Although, generally speaking, the media should not interfere in people’s private lives, there are times when it is correct to do so. If a politician is becoming very rich, the media should investigate where the money is coming from. If a businessman is committing a crime, the public should know. It is also fair for the media to show contradictions between a famous people’s private and public lives. A further point is that media such as TV or papers are meeting a demand. We can make the media accountable by not buying rubbishy magazines or watching sensationalist programs

21. Conclusions A good conclusion:
summarizes the two ideas (for and against) and
looks to the future and/or
gives your opinion

22. Conclusion
In conclusion, the responsibility lies with us, the consumers. We should treat celebrities the way we would like to be treated—with respect, and we should treat trashy media with the scorn it deserves.