Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

BENIGN VS MALIGNANT MASSES IN BREAST ULTRASOUND

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "BENIGN VS MALIGNANT MASSES IN BREAST ULTRASOUND"— Presentation transcript:

1 BENIGN VS MALIGNANT MASSES IN BREAST ULTRASOUND
Dr. Mona Rozin Director of Breast Imaging Assuta Medical Centers mrozin,md

2 Goal of Breast Ultrasound
SOLID VS CYSTIC mrozin,md

3 Goal of Breast Ultrasound
Make a more specific diagnosis than clinical and mammographic findings alone. Prevent unnecessary biopsies. Find cancers missed by mammography. mrozin,md

4 Breast cancer is extremely heterogeneous therefore we CANNOT distinguish benign from malignant on the basis of only a single sonographic finding. Breast cancer varies greatly not only from one mass to another but even WITHIN an individual mass. mrozin,md

5 Ultrasound shows morphology and not histology / biology
ONE suspicious finding requires further evaluation -----> that is biopsy and should be given BIRAD 4A up to 5 mrozin,md

6 BIRADS for U/S BIRAD 1 – normal BIRAD 2 – benign finding
BIRAD 3 – probably benign mrozin,md

7 BIRADS for U/S BIRAD 4A – abnormal finding – low suspicion
BIRAD 4B – abnormal finding – intermediate suspicion BIRAD 4C – abnormal finding – probably malignant BIRAD 5 – highly suspicious for malignancy BIRAD 6 – known malignancy mrozin,md

8 Spectrum of masses mrozin,md

9 Circumscribed vs Spiculated malignant masses – a spectrum of ultrasound features
Desmoplastic vs. inflammatory reaction Cellularity III. Vascularity mrozin,md

10 Desmoplastic Reaction
Host response to tumor – attempt to wall off the tumor with fibrosis and elastosis to keep it from spreading. Develops slowly Therefore spiculated lesions are usually slow growing GRADE 1 – 2 tumors mrozin,md

11 Inflammatory Response
GRADE 3 tumors may be circumscribed and grow so fast that desmoplasia has no time to develop. These carcinomas incite an inflammatory response with lymphocytes and plasma cells. mrozin,md

12 Cellularity Circumscribed masses are much more cellular than spiculated masses. They have lots of tumor cells, lymph cells and plasma cells – this causes posterior enhancement. Spiculated masses have much fewer cells and very hypocellular desmoplasia – this causes posterior shadowing. mrozin,md

13 Vascularity Circumscribed masses are usually very vascular – lots of cells and divisions require more blood – more angiogenetic factors; inflammatory response also creates hypervascularity. Spiculated masses may have same vascularity as normal tissue or benign masses because of the smaller amount of cells and angiogenetic factors. mrozin,md

14 mrozin,md

15 BIRADS for Ultrasound Masses
Shape Margin Orientation Lesion boundary Echogenic pattern Posterior acoustic features Effect on surrounding parenchyma Calcifications Vascularity mrozin,md

16 Background Breast Pattern
Homogenous Fatty Heterogeneous – focally or diffusely variable Homogenous Fibroglandular mrozin,md

17 Fatty mrozin,md

18 Heterogeneous mrozin,md

19 Fibroglandular mrozin,md

20 I. Shape Oval – includes tear drop shape macrolobulations may be with thin echogenic capsule Round – cysts, mets, IDC (high grade) Irregular – NOT round or oval mrozin,md

21 Oval fibroadenoma DCIS mrozin,md

22 Round cyst DCIS mrozin,md

23 Irregular radial scar IDC IDC mrozin,md

24 II. Margin Circumscribed – smooth, distinct margin
Microlobulated – may be the expression of extended lobules filled with DCIS; 80% of all IDC have a component of DCIS Indistinct – NO abrupt interface with surrounding tissue mrozin,md

25 Circumscribed mrozin,md

26 II. Margin Circumscribed – smooth, distinct margin
Microlobulated – may be the expression of extended lobules filled with DCIS; 80% of all IDC have a component of DCIS Indistinct – NO abrupt interface with surrounding tissue mrozin,md

27 Microlobulated mrozin,md

28 mrozin,md

29 II. Margin Circumscribed – smooth, distinct margin
Microlobulated – may be the expression of extended lobules filled with DCIS; 80% of all IDC have a component of DCIS Indistinct – NO abrupt interface with surrounding tissue mrozin,md

30 Indistinct mrozin,md

31 Margin – cont. Angular – part of margin has sharp corners; most accurate of all signs of malignancy; invasion follows path of least resistance – in fat: many angles; in fibrosis: horizontal and then along Cooper’s ligaments Spiculated – sharp projecting lines; use U/S MAG views to see surface characteristics This is a spectrum of findings mrozin,md

32 Angular mrozin,md

33 mrozin,md

34 Margin – cont. Angular – part of margin has sharp corners; most accurate of all signs of malignancy; invasion follows path of least resistance – in fat: many angles; in fibrosis: horizontal and then along Cooper’s ligaments Spiculated – sharp projecting lines; use U/S MAG views to see surface characteristics This is a spectrum of findings mrozin,md

35 Spiculated mrozin,md

36 Mixed mrozin,md

37 III. Orientation Parallel – wider than tall – long axis parallel to skin NOT parallel – taller than wide – long axis perpendicular to skin includes ROUND masses mrozin,md

38 TDLU mrozin,md

39 CA FA mrozin,md

40 mrozin,md

41 mrozin,md

42 post. ant. terminal mrozin,md

43 mrozin,md

44 Wider than tall !! ant. lobule terminal lobules
distended duct with invasion mrozin,md

45 IV. Lesion Boundary Abrupt interface – no transition zone between mass and surrounding tissue Echogenic rim – variant of spicules too small to resolve on U/S; some masses have a very thick echogenic rim with a tiny hypoechogenic nidus – must examine carefully; peritumoral edema usually occurs btw. mass and skin mrozin,md

46 Abrupt Interface FA CA echogenic capsule mrozin,md

47 IV. Lesion Boundary Abrupt interface – no transition zone between mass and surrounding tissue Echogenic rim – variant of spicules too small to resolve on U/S; some masses have a very thick echogenic rim with a tiny hypoechogenic nidus – must examine carefully; peritumoral edema usually occurs btw. mass and skin mrozin,md

48 Echogenic Rim mrozin,md

49 Echogenic Rim Same mass – with & without Sono-CT mrozin,md

50 V. Echogenic Pattern Hyperechoic – more than fat; very rarely can be angiosarcoma, ILC, lymphoma Isoechoic – equal to fat Hypoechoic – less than fat Mixed – hyper and hypo; can be fibrosis, fat necrosis, FA, IDC Anechoic – absence of internal echoes; mets, IDC- high grade. mrozin,md

51 normal fibrotic tisssue
fat necrosis silicone mrozin,md

52 hyper? NOT hyper with iso mo later mrozin,md

53 V. Echogenic Pattern Hyperechoic – more than fat; very rarely can be angiosarcoma, ILC, lymphoma Isoechoic – equal to fat Hypoechoic – less than fat Mixed – hyper and hypo; can be fibrosis, fat necrosis, FA, IDC Anechoic – absence of internal echoes; mets, IDC- high grade. mrozin,md

54 mrozin,md

55 Mucinous CA mrozin,md

56 V. Echogenic Pattern Hyperechoic – more than fat; very rarely can be angiosarcoma, ILC, lymphoma Isoechoic – equal to fat Hypoechoic – less than fat Mixed – hyper and hypo; can be fibrosis, fat necrosis, FA, IDC Anechoic – absence of internal echoes; mets, IDC- high grade. mrozin,md

57 IDC seroma FA mrozin,md

58 V. Echogenic Pattern Hyperechoic – more than fat; very rarely can be angiosarcoma, ILC, lymphoma Isoechoic – equal to fat Hypoechoic – less than fat Mixed – hyper and hypo; can be fibrosis, fat necrosis, FA, IDC Anechoic – absence of internal echoes; mets, IDC- high grade. mrozin,md

59 Intracystic papillary CA
phylloides hematoma mrozin,md

60 V. Echogenic Pattern Hyperechoic – more than fat; very rarely can be angiosarcoma, ILC, lymphoma Isoechoic – equal to fat Hypoechoic – less than fat Mixed – hyper and hypo; can be fibrosis, fat necrosis, FA, IDC Anechoic – absence of internal echoes; cysts mets, IDC- high grade. mrozin,md

61 cysts mrozin,md

62 VI. Posterior Acoustic Features
None Enhancement – highly cellular lesions Shadowing – seen in desmoplasia Combined Can use this finding to try and predict GRADE; very small lesions (< 5 mm) may have no transmission because haven’t had time to develop desmoplasia or inflammatory reaction mrozin,md

63 Shadowing mrozin,md

64 enhancement normal cyst CA mrozin,md

65 DO NOT FORGET - May see artifactual shadowing from steep Cooper’s ligaments – can be removed with compression ! mrozin,md

66 artifact compression mrozin,md

67 DD of Enhancement IDC – high GRADE Mucinous CA Medullary CA
Metaplastic CA Papillary CA FA Cysts mrozin,md

68 DD of Shadowing IDC – low GRADE ILC Tubular CA Scar Fat necrosis
Radial scar Calcified FA Calcified oil cysts mrozin,md

69 VII. Effect on Surrounding Tissue
Straightening of Cooper’s ligaments Architectural distortion Skin thickening – normal 2 mm Skin retraction Edema – mastitis, radiation Tx, inflammatory CA, CHF Ducts – abnormal size, branching mrozin,md

70 Architectural distortion
Thickening & straightening of cooper’s ligaments mrozin,md

71 VII. Effect on Surrounding Tissue
Straightening of Cooper’s ligaments Architectural distortion Skin thickening – normal 2 mm Skin retraction Edema – mastitis, radiation Tx, inflammatory CA, CHF Ducts – abnormal size, branching mrozin,md

72 Skin thickening Inflammatory CA mrozin,md

73 Skin retraction in scar with seroma
mrozin,md

74 VII. Effect on Surrounding Tissue
Straightening of Cooper’s ligaments Architectural distortion Skin thickening – normal 2 mm Skin retraction Edema – mastitis, radiation Tx, inflammatory CA, CHF Ducts – abnormal size, branching mrozin,md

75 Edema with dilated lymphatics
focal edema Edema with dilated lymphatics mrozin,md

76 VII. Effect on Surrounding Tissue
Straightening of Cooper’s ligaments Architectural distortion Skin thickening – normal 2 mm Skin retraction Edema – mastitis, radiation Tx, inflammatory CA, CHF Ducts – abnormal size, branching mrozin,md

77 mrozin,md

78 Duct extension Branch pattern mrozin,md

79 2nd lumpectomy with + margin
IDC Duct extension 2nd lumpectomy with + margin 1st lumpectomy with + margin mrozin,md

80 VIII. Calcifications Macrocalcifications
Microcalcifications outside a mass Microcalcifications inside a mass mrozin,md

81 FA Oil cyst mrozin,md

82 IDC DCIS mrozin,md

83 IX. Vascularity Absent Present Adjacent to lesion
In surrounding tissue mrozin,md

84 Feeding vessel IDC-Grade I mrozin,md

85 IDC-GradeII mrozin,md

86 FA mrozin,md

87 FA Cyst mrozin,md

88 mrozin,md

89 mrozin,md

90 Suspicious for Malignancy
Hard spiculations, thick rim angular margins (shadowing) Intermediate hypoechoic microlobulation taller than wide Stavaros mrozin,md

91 III. Soft duct extension branching pattern calcifications
Stavaros mrozin,md

92 Most likely benign Oval Circumscribed – echogenic capsule Parallel
Abrupt interface Hyperechogenic mrozin,md

93 Algorithm for Sonographic Evaluation
Look for malignant findings and if there are any – give BIRADS 4-5 and biopsy If there are NO malignant findings look for benign findings and if there are any give BIRADS 2-3 and suggest follow-up If NO benign findings found – give BIRADS 4A and biopsy mrozin,md

94 (without which there is nothing) technique, technique, technique
Sine Qua Non (without which there is nothing) technique, technique, technique Must always base management on the worst feature present !!!! mrozin,md

95 Thank You ! mrozin,md


Download ppt "BENIGN VS MALIGNANT MASSES IN BREAST ULTRASOUND"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google