Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLaura Bazley Modified over 9 years ago
1
Now the research !!!!
2
EM-Silage Research results ID-Lelystad Rapport no. 2165
3
EM-Silage Research comparision: - Without silage additive - EM- A - EM-Silage
4
EM-Silage Materials: Grass - Cutting date 7-05-2001 -Field period 40 hours -DM percentage 50% - Picked up by cutting harvester
5
EM-Silage Results : After 2 months of incubation CON EM-S EM-A Weight loss. pH. Aer. St. 39,0 a 25,8 b 23,9 b 5,88 a 4,36 b 4,29 b 60 a >525 b >525 b
6
EM-Silage DM - - - 451 440 436 Weigt loss. 2.73 3.00 6.70 11.5 24.0 21.2 pH. 6.55 6.50 5.49 5.11 4.42 4.36 Yeast - - - 2.15 <2 <2 Fungall app. - - - <2 <2 <2 Lactic accid - - - 41.9 79.3 85.2 Vinagres - - - 7.6 36.2 39.2 Ethanol - - - 11.2 17.7 11.7 Con EM-S EM-A Con EM-S EM-A
7
EM-Silage Con EM-S EM-A Con EM-S EM-A 1,2 Prop-diol - - - 0 10.0 9.0 2,3 But-diol - - - 0.3 0.3 0.3 Propionic acid - - - 2.2 2.4 2.7 1-Propanol - - - 0 2.3 2.9 Ammoniak - - - 2.5 3.5 3.6
8
EM Silage and production
11
Results after opening 0,422 Stdev 48 2.400 0,03 0,13 0,0025 0,030 0,046 ANOVA 95% - * +* + - - + +
12
DM losses after desiling and 7days after desiling. 32.83 a 4.92 a 32.06 a 2.12 b 1-Anova *** ****
13
Research EM-Silage
14
Fermentation research Maize ( LU Wageningen ) Con. EM-Silage Diff in %
16
EM-Silage Good silage additive. First class fermentation. Improves aerobical stability. Easy application. Low costs for end users.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.