Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byChana Fennell Modified over 9 years ago
1
AutO&Mobility: driving with a visual impairment in the Netherlands dr. Bart Melis-Dankers PhD Royal Dutch Visio Centre of expertise for blind and partially sighted people SMS-conference December 5, 2012 København
2
Shared Space 2 16.7 million inhabitants 316,000 visually impaired people [1.9%] primary care:700 optometrists and 2,500 opticians. secondary care:707 ophthalmologists [1:23,600]. tertiary care: visual rehabilitation centres: -- Royal Dutch Visio: 3,200 employees -- Bartiméus: 2,200 employees The Netherlands
3
Shared Space 3 Optimization of independent mobility is important for social participation. Driving is the main form of transport in NL. 7.7 million passenger cars. Driving itself is not the goal. Independent mobility is! Safety first. Rehabilitation programme AutO-Mobility: Individual advice and training programme to optimize independent mobility, if possible in motorised vehicles. AutO-Mobility
4
Shared Space 4 fitness to drive: NL in 1998 medical visual acuity:0.5 in best eye [6/12, 20/40] visual field:≥ 140° practical the ability to drive safely and smoothly despite one’s visual impairment. on road driving test by the Netherlands Bureau of Driving Skills Certificates [CBR].
5
Shared Space 5 VA = 0.2 visual acuity 0.5 : reading licence plate at 35m
6
Shared Space 6 Step 1: Coeckelbergh & Kooijman 1998 – 2002 N = 67 participants. Visual acuity loss and/or visual field defect. All had insufficient medical fitness to drive. Practical fitness to drive test [CBR]. [Human Factors, 2004, 46(4): 748-760]
7
Shared Space 7 central peripheral central and peripheral VA Snellen horizontal field diameter (degrees) (n=24) 0.23 142 (n=36) 0.74 84 (n=7) 0.19 91 Visual Field Defect passed failed practical fitness to drive: 6 (25%) 15 (42%) 2 (14%) 21 (58%) 5 (86%) 18 (75%) N = 67 participants Step 1: Coeckelbergh & Kooijman 1998 – 2002: data
8
Shared Space 8 Step 1: Coeckelbergh & Kooijman 1998 – 2002: conclusion N = 67 All had insufficient medical fitness to drive. 34% passed practical fitness to drive test [CBR] The medical fitness to drive (visual acuity and visual field) provides not sufficient information to decide about the practical fitness to drive. [Human Factors, 2004, 46(4): 748-760]
9
Shared Space 9 Netherlands Bureau of Driving Skills Certificates [CBR] Ministery of Transport 2 driving schools University Medical Center Opthalmology Univeristy Medical Center Traffic Medicine Royal Dutch Visio: clinical physicist optometrist occupational therapist neuro-psychologist Step 2: build a consortium 2000 - 2004
10
Shared Space 10 Impaired visual acuity: Bioptic Telescope System [BTS] Visual field defect: homonymous hemianopia Scanning Compensatory Therapy [SCT] Step 3: development of training 2004 - 2007
11
Road design Traffic signs / traffic lights Route signs Other road users VA = 0.16 = 20/125
12
Shared Space 12 Bioptic telescope system [BTS] monocular 2x - 3x magnification field of view: 15° weight: 12 gr.
13
Shared Space 13 Correct BTS use driving road signs crossings / traffic lights pedestrians / cyclists overtaking safety first right moments short goal directed in time (not too early)
14
Shared Space 14 Step 3a: pilot project BTS 2004 - 2007 inclusion: 0.16 <= BBCVA < 0.5 BTS-programme: assessment day fitting BTS [optometrist] O&M-training 4 x 3 hours [O&M-trainer] driving lessons [driving instructor] practical fitness to drive test [CBR] 9 subjects passed fitness to drive test with BTS [Visual Impairment Research, 2008, 10: 1-6] [Visual Impairment Research, 2008, 10: 7-22]
15
15 The Effects of Compensatory Scanning Training on Driving for Hemianopia Patients Gera de Haan MSc. University of Groningen, The Netherlands Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology
16
16 Current study Aim: Examining the effect of compensatory scanning training on mobility for homonymous hemianopia. Compensatory Scanning Training: 1. Increase of awareness 2. Systematic scanning strategy 3. Transfer to mobility in daily life
17
17 Systematic scanning strategy Based on training Pizzamiglio (1992) and Tant (2002) Scanning strategy: ◦ Fixate straight ahead ◦ Large saccade towards blind hemifield ◦ Saccade back to seeing hemifield ◦ Fixate straight ahead ◦... Right hemianopia:
18
18 Participants in driving study RCT of 60 hemianopic patients with mobility problems Effect of Scanning Compensatory Training on mobility and Quality of Life ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N = 27 adults reporting mobility problems because of a homonymous hemianopia, the hemianopia existing for at least 6 months N = 21 left-sided hemianopia, N = 6 right-sided hemianopia N = 18 male, N = 9 female M(age) = [27-71] M(TimeSinceLesion) = 24 months [6.5-122] No severe motor, neuropsychologic or hearing impairments No ophthalmologic dysfunctioning and binocular visual acuity > 0.5
19
19 Training group T1T2 Control group T3 Training T1 T2 Training pre post -3mth Design Tests on T1, T2 and T3: Impaired Mobility Questionnaire (IMQ; Turano, 1999) Tracking Task Obstacle course (with dual task) Hazard perception (Vlakveld, 2011)
21
21 Training group T1T2 Control group T3 Training T1 T2 Training pre post -3mth Design Tests on T1, T2 and T3: Impaired Mobility Questionnaire (IMQ; Turano, 1999) Tracking Task Obstacle course (with dual task) Hazard perception (Vlakveld, 2011) Driving simulator Fitness to drive
22
Shared Space 22 inclusion: homonymous hemianopia SCT-programme: assessment day optimizing optics [optometrist] SCT-training 10 x 1.5 hours [O&M-trainer] driving lessons [driving instructor] practical fitness to drive test [CBR] Step 3b: scanning compensatory therapy 2007 - 2012
23
Result
25
25 Practical Fitness to drive: TRIP Test Ride for Investigating Practical fitness to drive 57 items: insufficient, doubtful, sufficient Driving test taken by ‘blind’ CBR-expert Factors: ◦ VIS: visual factor ◦ OPER: operational factor ◦ TACT: tactical factor
26
26 Fitness to drive N = 27 Hemianopia patients (total N = 57) N = 21 left-sided, N = 6 right-sided hemianopia N = 18 male, N = 9 female M(Age) = 52 [27-71] CBR (Dutch department of motor vehicles) 2 on-road driving assessments: Before onset of training (N=27) 15 passed (56%) 12 failed (44%) After training (N=10) 6 failed4 passed
27
27 Fitness to drive: TRIP TRIP-factors improve after training
28
28 Conclusion Self-reported mobility in daily life improved (IMQ) Faster responses to stimuli in the blind periphery (Tracking Task) Higher walking speed in obstacle course with cognitive dual task Part of patients with hemianopiae is practical fit to drive, even without training. Visual aspects of driving are most problematic. Negative judgement due to insufficient viewing strategy, but also due to operational and tactical driving. Training improves visual and tactical aspects. No age-related effect found. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hemianopia does not necessarily impair fitness to drive
29
Shared Space 29 report to the minister of Transport decisions: May 2009 and February 2010 visual acuity impairment: VA >= 0.50 : unrestricted driving license 0.40 <= VA < 0.50 : CBR-test without BTS 0.16 <= VA < 0.40 : CBR-test with BTS visual field defect: HVF >= 120° : unrestricted driving license 90° <= HVF < 120°: CBR-test Step 4: lobby to change regulations 2007 - 2010
30
Shared Space 30 South NW North SW Step 5: extending consortium 2009 - 2010 ° ° 4 regions: 12 locations education of: 9 information officers 31 optometrists 25 O&M trainers 6 clinical physicists 5 neuro-psychologists 23 driving instructors 8 CBR experts on practical fitness to drive 12 CBR driving examiners September 2010: AutO-Mobility nationally available
31
Shared Space 31 BTS:SCT: driving licenses issued: 70 19 not fit to drive: >250 >80 Remember: AutO&Mobility is about mobility (and not driving per se). ------------------------------------------------------------ 2012: BTS-program for nystagmus patients Current situation December 2012
32
Shared Space 32 New programmes for: mobility scooter [16 km/h = 10 miles/h] microcars [45 km/h = 30 miles/h] patients with combined acuity and field impairment patients with visual and neurological impairment Step 6: future developments 2012 - 2015
33
Shared Space 33 ITMA 2012: May 19-22 International Traffic Medicine Association Hamburg www.trafficmedicine.org ----------------------------------------------------------------- ESLRR 2012: September 13-15 European Society for Low Vision Research and Rehabilitation Oxford www.eslrr.eu Interesting congresses
34
Shared Space 34 Royal Dutch Visio www.auto-mobiliteit.org BartMelis@visio.org Please contact
35
35 Practical fitness to drive: TRIP Main reason for negative judgement
36
VISOPERTACTGLOBTOT Mean (SD) Drive1 (N=27) 2.60 (0.51) 2.70 (0.48) 2.67 (0.41) 2.52 (0.64) 2.66 (0.43) Failed (N=12) 2.20 (0.53) 2.40 (0.58) 2.36 (0.44) 1.92 (0.52) 2.32 (0.45) Passes (N=15) 2.92 (0.10) 2.95 (0.10) 2.92 (0.10) 3.00 (0.00) 2.93 (0.06) p-value.001.007.001<.001.001 LHH (N=21) 2.50 (0.54) 2.64 (0.52) 2.61 (0.45) 2.38 (0.67) 2.58 (0.46) RHH (N=6) 2.94 (0.10) 2.93 (0.13) 2.88 (0.10) 3.00 (0.00) 2.93 (0.07) p-value.002.032.019<.001.003 Men (N=18) 2.61 (0.41) 2.73 (0.41) 2.71 (0.35) 2.56 (0.57) 2.69 (0.31) Women (N=9) 2.58 (0.70) 2.64 (0.61) 2.58 (0.52) 2.44 (0.80) 2.60 (0.62) p-value.896.643.451.667.609 ratings on the individual TRIP-items, split by factor (N=27)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.