1. Distinction Between Law And Morality. >>> How to write an essay? Order on the website HelpWriting.Net <<<. Distinction Between Law And Morality This essay will provide a critical discussion of Fullers distinction between law's internal and external moralities. In taking a positivist stance, it will be argued that Fullers distinction is highly objectionable, especially in light of Harts argument that the internal morality is more akin to principals of efficiency and that therefore there exists no necessary connection between these purported moralities to each other, or the law itself. This essay will begin by briefly defining Fullers moralities, stating its novelty and considering the context in which it was made. What will follow is a critical appraisal of his thesis, the arguments against it, and Fullers responses to these. This essay will demonstrate that Fullers defence does not substantially allay the criticisms fronted against it. Thus, it will be concluded that his thesis cannot hold good in light of the criticisms which have followed it. In an attempt to demonstrate a connection between law and morality, Fuller has claimed that there exists both an 'internal' and 'external' morality of law. While in practise the distinction is not so clearly defined, the internal morality refers to the morality implicit in the creation and application of law, whereas the external morality concerns itself with the moral goodness of the substantive aims of law. This twofold analysis creates the novel claim that law is subject to morality not only existent in the substance of law as is traditionally argued by natural law >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

2. Essay Help Toronto - " HelpWriting.Net ". Ethics, Morals, And Laws Essay Ethics are defined as "moral principles, as of an individual." Giving dropped money back to a blind man is an example of good ethics. I believe in having a strong sense of ethics. Morality or morals can be defined as "of, relating to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong." I believe having a good moral sense is crucial to participate in the world. Without one, you can make a lot of people angry, you could get fired from a job, or you could even get thrown in jail. Legality or the laws which govern us are rules we are forced to live by. They keep us in line and stop us from doing unjust things. I believe in the Judeo– Christian laws of our country. People who don't abide by the strong morals of our country, or who are unethical, have the capacity to damage our society. The difference between Ethics, Morals, and Laws is slim. Morals make up ethics. Legality takes ethical practices and tells you things you can't do based on what society thinks of as right and wrong. Computer hacking can be both ethical and unethical. Ethical hacking is when something is hacked legally and helps better the community. For example, operating systems are usually hacked by their creators to see what the vulnerabilities are. Then they are fixed or patched. The most serious issue in the computer world (and in the presidential race) is unethical hacking. Unethical hacking is when someone steals data for their own gain, or when someone >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

3. Cheap Essay Writing Service Online - " HelpWriting.Net ". Morality Vs. Morality : Morality And Morality Although law and morality are two separate issues it is evident that morality plays a crucial role in the law. Dr. JГјrgen Habermas stated "law is internally related... to morality". The idea of law is not that it must be moral but that it provides a system to allow people to live together peacefully in a society. However, as much as it is debated, it is apparent that in order for human civilisation to work laws must generally be moral. Natural law is a theory that emphasises the role of morality in the law. Naturalists argue that all legal official and those within a position of power are under a moral obligation. A Confucian scholar Mencius stated "only the benevolent man is fit to be in high position. For a cruel man to be in high position is for him to disseminate his wickedness among the people". Positivists, on the other hand, argue that morality does not play a role in the law claiming that people should not be concerned with whether the law is moral or not. In modern times morality plays a huge part in the law even if it is not recognised. In order for new rules to be brought into place the sovereign must look at whether or not it is moral. If not this could have serious implications for the running of the country. I will further discuss these theories and issues in relation to the role that morality plays in the law. Morality, simply, is the difference between right and wrong. For most people they have been socialised into knowing the difference between right and >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

4. Help In Writing Essays - " HelpWriting.Net ". Should Law Improve Morality? Essay In "Should law improve morality?" Leslie Green argues, firstly, that law is capable of having causal impact on the nature of social morality and, secondly, that one of the functions of law should be the betterment of morality. In maintaining that the law ought to be intimately connected to morality, it appears as though Green is advocating for a modern version of the natural law perspective. After first giving an account of natural law, this paper will explicate Green 's distinction between "ideal" and "social" morality. This distinction allows him to assert that morality can be changed without violating basic intuitions about the metaphysics of moral principles, and allows him to escape the objection to natural law which refers to the diversity in moral rules found across societies. An objection to Green 's argument for the causal efficacy of law on morality and his response will then be examined. Finally, his argument for why law ought to be used to improve morality, regardless of how slow or indirect these changes might be, will be expounded and analyzed. Ultimately, it will be argued that Green is correct to assert that the law can (and should) influence morality, but that he overestimates the amount of choice involved when a society accomplishes this feat. Boyd (2015) describes the natural law perspective as stating that there is a necessary connection between morality and law, whereby the content of the law conforms to morality (p. 9). Although it is certain that >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

5. Best Essay Cheap - " HelpWriting.Net ". The Relationship Between Law And Morality The relationship between law and morality is that law is specific and straight forward, whereas morality concentrates on what is wrong and right which makes it vague. Lord Patrick Devlin and John Stuart Mill have different opinions on law and morality. Devlin believes that we may not need common religion but need common morality and also that society should be prevented from harm. It should matter what society thinks about the good and right. Devlin is incorrect. As Mill would agree, the ultimate freedom is what matters. Individuals should get to express themselves however they want, as long as it does not cause harm to others. John Stuart Mill 's theory is more rational to me because first, it explains whether or not humans are infallible, Second, it is applicable to leading a happy and free life and finally, regardless of how free it seems, it still include morals in it in a sense that no harm should be done to anyone expect for one's self. To begin with, Lord Patrick Devlin believes that we may not need common religion but need common moralism because he thinks society should be protected from harm. Society cannot be protected from harm. There is the law to protect us from harm but not everyone agrees with what the law says. The Labaye's case can be used as an example of why Devlin's theory is incorrect. The Labaye's case is about Jean–Paul Labaye who is being accused for the practice of indecency. Devlin would agree with the judge who prosecuted the accused because he did >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

6. Essay Writing Services Recommendations - " HelpWriting.Net ". Essay on Relationship Between Law and Morality In this essay I intend to discuss the relationship between law and morality through the perspectives of legal philosophers, I will provide a brief explanation of law, and what does law intend to achieve in the society. When discussing the relationship between law and morality I will consider the distinction between the theory of natural law and legal positivism and how these two theories influence each other and whether there is a legal or moral duty for the society to obey the law. Legal philosophers have tried to provide a brief explanation for the meaning of law; however their definitions have been vague and ambiguous. John Austin explained law as 'something which is man –made and separate from morality and justice, furthermore provided... Show more content on Helpwriting.net... Law also provide facilities for people to make their own arrangements, law protect and facilitate different arrangements between people, and law settles disputes about what law is and whether a certain conduct conflicts with legal rules. It aims to create laws that are predictable, that are able to be easily analysed and understandable by the general society. Morality is what the society regard as right and wrong which is highly subjective, some legal philosophers believe that there is a certain moral standard which human laws must contain. Chapter 2 in The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 which is the Bill of Rights contains moral values which the country is based. Section 1 of the Constitution provides that South Africa is an independent sovereign, democratic state which was based on following values: пѓ 'Human dignity, achievement of equality and advancement of human rights and freedom, пѓ Non racialism and non sexism.' South African Constitution is entrenched with moral standards in the Bill of Rights, these is also noted in the case of S v Makwanyane where the court declared death penalty unconstitutional based on that it conflict on the right to life, human dignity and right not to inflict bodily harm. Natural law dictates and limits the scope in which positive lawyers can enact and enforce the law, as we note in >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

7. Essay Writing Service Discount - " HelpWriting.Net ". Relationship Between Law And Morality What is law? "Laws are rules made by government that forbid certain actions and are enforced by the courts." (Government of Canada, Department of Justice, Electronic Communications, 2017). [In other words] Law is a set of rules and regulations enacted by a government that affects our daily lives. "The Rule of Law" is; none is above the law. This rule ensures equality. Another significant aspect of law is morality. Morality is what is deemed ethically right or wrong. It is a set of societal standards or principles that are based on primary sources such as religious doctrines. Morality comes from the word moral. A moral is a value or principle that differentiates the good from bad. The connection between law and morality is that, morality is that basis and foundation of law. "Law cannot be established without reference to morality" (Blair & Elliott, 2004, p. 110). Though morality is the building blocks of law, occasionally they conflict. For example, stealing is against the law, but what if a man stole a loaf of bread to feed his starving wife and children? Would it seem to be as big and bad of a crime then? No, but it is still deemed to be "illegal". In the movie "John Q" many legal issues occurred, and several laws were broken. John took 9 hostages in a last– minute attempt of getting his son a heart transplant. John was acquitted on the charges of armed criminal offence and attempted murder. John had a firearm on him during the duration of when he held the hostages, but it >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

8. Best Online Essay Writers - " HelpWriting.Net ". Outline and critically evaluate Hart's account of the relationship between law and morality. Introduction: Natural law theorists believe that all law must be morally justified if it can be legitimised as law at all. Legal positivism means the simple contention that it is in no sense a necessary truth that laws reproduce or satisfy certain demands of morality, though in fact they have otherwise done so. (Hart, DATE) In Hart's eyes, though there may be a congruence between law and morality, it is by no means a necessary connection. (Hart, DATE) Hart promotes the need for a clear distinction between law and morality on two levels. Firstly the Social and hermeneutic level in regards to both law and morality sharing vocabulary in both structure and function – showing that in many societies legal rules will match their moral rules. Second a logic and hypothetical level – Hart believes in the possibility of a legal system existing without the influence of morality as there are cases were legal systems do not match the moral grounds of society.( see Austins command theory and the idea of one sovereign ruling all) (SOURCE) Hart's idea is this: All one/society needs is a legal system based on the four rules. This paper will demonstrate how Hart's account of the relationship between law and morality shows an understanding of how they both work together yet can also work as separate entities. It will take a specific look into the internal point of view to aid the understanding of why >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

9. Custom Essays Cheap - " HelpWriting.Net ". Morality Essay examples Morality is defined as a system or code that we humans use to differentiate between right and wrong. This system could be derived from a number of factors: religion, culture, and upbringing. It is difficult enough to determine what an individual's morals are, but going further to determine how we came to possess those morals is even more ambitious. Still, regardless of its difficulty, this subject consumes many philosophers and psychologists. One such moral psychologists, Jonathan Haidt, is theorizing the possibility of evolution causing ones morality. Haidt is a moral psychologist at the Universtiy of Virgina further believes that complex social structures such as religion and politics as well as our need for social structures affect... Show more content on Helpwriting.net... One is the ancient system, a system that developed before humans could speak. This system drives our emotions. It is with this system that humans received their instinctual reactions to specific situations; it is these sorts of "gut reactions" that enabled human survival in ancient times. The other is a modern system, a system that initiated when language was invented. This system, he explains, is more associated with our ability to reason and judge. This system allows us to question our instinctual reactions and determine some explanation as to why we feel a particular way. However, he feels that these two complex systems are subconsciously active within the individual; he does not believe that people are aware of these concepts affecting their morality. These two systems are the key or answer to why moral dumbfounding occurs. It occurs when the two systems conflict В —when reasoning cannot explain your initial reaction. Furthermore, Haidt believes that emotions are linked more to one's subconscious, while reasoning is linked to one's consciousness. He believes most philosophy focuses too much on the conscious while underestimating the power of the subconscious. In regards to his experiment testing one's disgust for eating one's pet, he believes this disgust originated in ancient times when people first began to eat meat. When beginning this tradition, people had to >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

10. Essay Writers Service - " HelpWriting.Net ". Law & Morality Essay Consider the view that there is a close relationship between law and morality. Examine the debate as to whether the law should reflect moral values, and discuss issues, which show the continuing importance of that debate. (30marks + 5 for AO3) A definition of law adapted from LB Curzon, Dictionary of Law states " the law is a set of rules which are binding among the people of a community or a state, so that they will be imposed upon and enforced among those persons by appropriate sanctions". The definition of morals given by Elliott and Quinn, Law for AQA state that "morals are beliefs and values which are shared by society, or a section of society; they tell those who share them what is right or wrong". There are many similarities... Show more content on Helpwriting.net... Prostitution is the act or practice of providing sexual services to another person in return for payment. In the United Kingdom, prostitution itself is not a crime, but soliciting in a public place, kerb crawling, owning or managing a brothel, pimping and pandering, are crimes. In England and Wales and in Northern Ireland it is an offence to pay for sex with a prostitute who has been "subjected to force" and this is a strict liability offence and clients can be prosecuted even if they didn't know the prostitute was forced. It is illegal to buy sex from a person younger than 18, although the age of consent for non– commercial sex is 16. Section 53A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 creates the offence of "paying for sexual services of a prostitute subjected to force etc.", which is a strict liability offence. This section was inserted on 1 April 2010 by section 14 of the Policing and Crime Act 2009. It is an offence for a person persistently to loiter or solicit in a street or public place for the purpose of prostitution. This offence is created by section 1(1) of the Street Offences Act 1959 as amended by section 16 of the Policing and Crime Act 2009. It prohibits street prostitution. The term "prostitute" is defined for the purposes of sections 48 to 50 and 52 and 53 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, and for the purposes of section >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

11. College Application Essay Writing Service - " HelpWriting.Net ". Positivist Theories Of Law And Morality Positivist theories of law can be described as "those who understand the law to be a particular sort of social ordering, a certain kind of social technology by which individuals who live together can coordinate their behaviour and resolve disputes." Positivist theories also state that there is no necessary connection between law and morality and rejects the idea of a higher law. Classical legal positivism was first founded by Jeremy Bentham (1748 –1832). Bentham's aim was to provide an alternative to what he saw as 'errors of the conventional jurisprudence' of his time. His ideas were later developed by John Austin, who promoted the 'Command Theory' of law. HLA Hart was very much in favour of legal positivism; however, he didn't agree with some of the concepts outlined by Austin. He analysed the classical theories of positivism, particularly those of Austin and Bentham and attempted to update this view of law. His argument for legal positivism challenged many of the concepts laid out by the classical theorists. This essay will, therefore, examine Hart's argument, in favour of legal positivism, look at his analysis of other positivists theories as well as criticisms of his own theory, notably that of Dworkin, and come to a conclusion on whether he provides a persuasive argument in favour of positivism. John Austin's theory on positivism was one of the main theories in which Hart critiqued in his legal positivism argument. Austin promoted the 'Command Theory' of law, within >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

12. Custom College Essay - " HelpWriting.Net ". The Connection Between Law And Morality II. WHAT IS MORALITY? "Law would not be really imperative, we know, unless behind the sword of the magistrate, the bulk of mankind felt the weight of social obligation, the irresistible burden of custom, of immemorial tradition, and the like, a social, and even a religious sanctity." The connection of law and morality has been much discussed ever since the revival of the scientific study of jurisprudence, but the question is not yet, and perhaps never will be, settled. Every variety of opinion has been entertained, from the extreme doctrine held that law is absolutely independent of morality, almost to the opposite position that morality and law are one. The popular conception of the connection between law and morality is that in some way the law exists to promote morality, to preserve those conditions which make the moral life possible, and thus to enable men to lead sober and industrious lives. Morality is a value –impregnated concept relating to certain normative patterns which aim at the augmentation of good and reduction of evil on individual and social life. The sphere of morality denotes rules or principles governing human behaviour which apply universally within a community or class. Morality is made up of actual standards which are adopted in the life of any particular community. Positive morality, like law therefore, emphasizes conduct rather than states of mind; it is similar to law in that it is imposed on individual for it has behind it the effective >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

13. Buy Essays Online Cheap - " HelpWriting.Net ". Law And Morality Essay Law and Morality It is not an everyday occurrence that someone must decide the fate of another's life. The dilemma of making a decision that someone must die in order for the others to survive, can obviously be troubling. The process in which the termination of one's life may be easy to make, but to justify that decision is the most difficult one. This paper is given a situation in which a decision of taking one's life is essential. The situation is that a nuclear war has occurred, which has destroyed most of the centres of civilization. There are five people that are that have escaped death by finding their way to a nuclear bunker. These five people consist of a pregnant woman; an old man, who is a retired judge; two teenagers – a... Show more content on Helpwriting.net... Law and morality play a large role here, mainly because there is a legal issue and a moral issue associated with the predicament. The reason law has a part in the situation is that after the decision is made, it will be examined legally and must be accountable for its consequences. Morality has its place too, because many will find it morally wrong to take one's life despite any justification.....there is some connection between law and morality, but the two are clearly not identical. First, morality is only concerned with right or wrong, with the good and evil; law is concerned with lots of things on which there is no right and wrong – procedures for land registration, incorporation and so on. Second, morality is to some extent uncertain and a matter for each individual, law tries to be objective, written down in black and white and there for all to see. Third, morality often leaves things vague and subject to general principle, law goes into specifics.1 From that description of law and morality, it is obvious how they relate to the issue here. When the time comes for one of the five people in the bunker eventually to die, it must be legally justified. The reason for this is that murder is illegal, unless legally justified.2 On the other hand, reasons >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

14. Custom Essay UK - " HelpWriting.Net ". Morality, Law, and Politics Essay I can imagine a perfect world. A world where morality is of upmost importance in our dealings with each other, where morals are critically examined, and debated with reason as well as passion. This world would be a pinnacle of human achievement. A pinnacle that we are nowhere near. Why is this? Well, in today's society, morals are often associated with obeying the law, and since laws are legislated by politicians, they are subject to politics. Laws are not right in and of themselves, and morals are not a matter of a majority's opinion. Some matters that are in the domain of charity are done through politics, often citing morality as a reason. Where exactly does charity fit in with morals? With politics? In this paper I will explore the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net... These should be the only rules that may overrule a person's actions, for the more restricted a person's action becomes, the less likely it is that they'll submit to those restrictions. The reason morals may overrule a person's actions because these rules are justified. Without justification, there is no reason at all for people to obey the rules, for in their eyes, the rules would be arbitrary, and thus would lack any sort of authority over people. Many people ask why morals should be able to prevail over people's desires. This is a valid question, one that must be answered if morals are to be defended. Morals must not only be reasonable for people to follow, but they must also have good reasons for people to follow them, otherwise people would not bother adhering to them. These reasons should motivate people to follow these rules. They must appeal to their perceived interests, but if these rules are to apply to all people, they cannot serve the interests of just a few people. Moral rules are not for imposing your own values and tastes on other people! As Narveson puts it, "[w]hat matters for morals is that its rules are individually reasonable for people to accept and to follow, so long as others do too" (MM, 16). Every nation today has laws, instituted by the ruling class (throughout this essay, when I mention laws I am referring to legal laws, not moral laws). The >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

15. College Essay Writer - " HelpWriting.Net ". Morality and the Law Morality and the Law The United States likes to think of itself as a highly evolved nation and that its judicial process is one of the fairest and least corrupt in the world. That might in fact be true but it by no means makes the American judicial system perfect by any stretch of the imagination. Part of the flawed aspects of the court systems and legislative systems in America has to do with the fact that so much is open to interpretation. Atkins v. Virginia is a case which is classically controversial. Some view it as a shining example where the highest court in the land was able to rule with a sense of humanity and rightness which reflected the greater morality at stake. Others viewed it as a failure on all count and a complete absence of justice. This paper will examine the two sides of this coin, demonstrating how this case makes a huge influence on the eternal debate of the connection between morality and the law. Atkins v. Virginia, which ruled it would be a violation of the constitution to execute a mentally retarded criminal convicted of first degree murder, does indeed have a tremendous amount of bearing on the central debate between natural law theorists and legal positivists. The central contention between natural law theorists and legal positivists is as follows: natural law theorists believe in the inherent bond between the law and morality; legal positivists do not. This case demonstrates the inherent morality present within the constitution and >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

16. Pay For Essay Cheap - " HelpWriting.Net ". A substantial debate over the law's relationship with morality exists within the legal system. This debate gained new perspective when Oliver Wendell Holmes published The Path of Law in 1897, which outlined his view on the relationship between the law and morality. This paper will first consider whether or not Holmes believed that a writing must be moral in order to constitute a law. Next, we will explore my general agreement with Holmes' view on this matter. Then, the paper will consider an objection to my agreement with Holmes, and then reply to that objection. Finally, we will end by analyzing the discussion of the relationship between morality and law. In this paper, I will argue that Holmes does not believe that a writing must be... Show more content on Helpwriting.net... With a solid understanding of the nature of law according to Holmes, one may now determine whether or not Holmes viewed morality as a necessary condition for a writing to be considered a law. Based on the nature of the law outlined by Holmes, one can conclude that Holmes did not believe that a writing must be moral in order to constitute a law. As we have seen, the law is nothing more than a mechanism of prediction (Holmes, 184). According to this definition, a writing does not have to be grounded in morality in order to be considered a law, but rather just has to play a role in this prediction mechanism. In order to be considered a law, a writing must be a prediction of how state force will be used in the future or a past legal decision which could help make more predictions about how state force will be used. This leaves morality out of the necessary conditions of a writing to be considered a law. Holmes goes as far as to say that moral language confuses the distinction between morality and law (183). Furthermore, he says that he "often doubt[s] [whether] it would not be a gain if every word of moral significance could be banished from the law altogether" (Holmes, 185). This is in spite of Holmes noting that the law "tends to make good citizens and [morally] good men" (183). Also contrary to the hard line Holmes draws between morality and law, Holmes states that the law shows us the history and progression of morality in humans (183). These two facts show that >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

17. Best Essay Writing Service Website - " HelpWriting.Net ". The Morality Of Law, By Lon L. Fuller Essay The idea of human dignity has been remarked and articulated in a number of the jurisprudence works of the mid–twentieth American legal philosopher, Lon L. Fuller. The Morality of Law, for instance, provides a valuable snapshot of Fuller's preliminary sense of what his idea on human dignity might entail. In the core of his argument of legal morality, Fuller proposes that any neglect of eight principles of legality, which constitutes the internal morality of law, is not just only render the rational ground to obey the law and destroy the trusteeship between lawgiver and subject, but it further condemns and humiliates the dignity of person or human being as a free and responsible agent, self– determining center of action, and that they possess inherent dignity. In other important text, Fuller explicitly announces that the value of human dignity, over other extra –legal values, that must embodied within the structure of legal order. After he offers a long discussion of human capacity of action and communication under the forms of order, he writes: " there is, therefore, in an ordered system of law, formulated and administered conscientiously, a certain built – in respect for human dignity, and I think it is reasonable to suppose that this respect will tend to carry over into the substantive ends of law." Thirdly, in his draft essay Means and Ends, which can be considered both as an introductory of Fuller's eunmoics theory of social order and Fuller's reflection on the >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<

18. Mba Essay Services - " HelpWriting.Net ". Separation between Law and Morality The positivistic thesis of the separation between law and morality, and it's origin is an attempt to divorce the law and the state from claims of religion and tradition. In this perspective, law is conventional in character and should not be subject to an ideal absolute and juristic study must not be influenced by external morality. According to Hart, this legal positivity consists in the acceptance of the separability thesis that there is no necessary connection between legal and moral norms. However According to, (Payne, 1976, p. 317)In a legal system the existence of any rule may be verified, questions about the moral/non– moral value of it may be raised, also questions about the validity of every rule except the rule of recognition. With this acceptance of a social rule, Hart can preserve the fundamental contention of legal positivism, that there is a factual criterion for distinguishing law from morals. All legal rules of a society can be determined by reference to an existing rule of recognition. For moral rules however it is neither necessary nor appropriate that there be an actually existing rule of recognition by which to determine the moral rules. The idea of a normative rule, and Hart's notion of acceptance is a rejection of the dichotomy between 'law based merely on power' and 'law which is accepted as morally binding'. From hart's methodology, his substantial aim of separating law and morals itself has normative moral grounds. Rather than defend legal >>> Get more content on Helpwriting.net <<<