1. Doña Rosario National High School Tubay District II

4. MERLE S. PACATANG Ph.D. CIP Consultant MERLE S. PACATANG Ph.D. CIP Consultant JESSIE C. GALAPIN Facilitator/Process Observer JESSIE C. GALAPIN Facilitator/Process Observer MRS. REAH BAHAN Communication MRS. REAH BAHAN Communication NANCIE E. QUEMADA Scribe NANCIE E. QUEMADA Scribe MAXIMINO B. ANGOB JR. Documentation MAXIMINO B. ANGOB JR. Documentation WILLIAM E. FELISILDA CIP TEAM LEADER WILLIAM E. FELISILDA CIP TEAM LEADER

8. The Project ASPIRE aims to improve the item analysis and identify the least learned competencies in all subject areas thru automation of checking of papers to lessen the burden of the teachers.

13. Based on REPUBLIC ACT NO. 4670, teacher must be engaged in the preparation and correction of exercises and other work incidental to his normal teaching duties. An efficient teacher can also examine the test item, try to identify what was tricky about it, and either change the item or modify instruction to correct a confusing misunderstanding about the content. As of the first quarter examination 28 out of 30 teachers said that getting a validation of quarterly examination and submission of item analysis is a salient contributor of tedious wo rkload of a teacher.

16. If items are too difficult, teachers can’t immediately modify the questions. Checking of test papers is a tedious task Wala ko nakasabay dungan sa schedule exam Langan pag check sa papel Langan ang pag validate sa correct and wrong answers kada item. BEFORE DURING AFTER No unified format of the answer s heet Walay standard format sa test q uestions There is no proper way to assess the validity of the appropriateness of test questions

17. SUPPLIERS INPUTS PROCESS OUTPUTS CUSTOMERS Quarterly Assessment Quarterly Assessment 30 out of 30 teachers submit grades, Item Analysis and MPS on time 30 out of 30 teachers submit grades, Item Analysis and MPS on time Grade 7-12 Teachers Developing Test Questions Item Writing Quarterly Assessment Quarterly Assessment Item Analysis Submission of MPS and Least Mastered Skills Teachers

18. Developing Test Questions Review of Test Quarterly Assessment Quarterly Assessment Submission of MPS and Least Mastered Skills Competency Manual Checking of Output Manual Checking of Output Conduct Item Analysis Conduct Item Analysis

19. Inaccurate report on MPS an d Least Mastered Skills Inaccurate tallying of correct response s of some teachers END Tedious task and dif ficulty to determine the appropriateness and validity of each test item Some teachers di d not follow the exam schedule Developing Test Questions Review of Test Quarterly Assessment Quarterly Assessment Submission of MPS and Least Mastered Skills Competency Manual Checking of Output Manual Checking of Output Conduct Item Analysis Conduct Item Analysis Not all advisers/ subject teachers prepare TOS START

20. As of August 2018, 32 out of 35 teachers did not submit Item Analysis and Mean Percentage Score due to manual checking and computation of item analysis.

21. 30 (100%) out of 30 Teachers are delaye d in submission of MPS & Least-learne d Competency No existing unified Answer Sheet No standard type of T est Questions Teachers do not admi nister exams as sche duled Teachers have different type of Test Teachers lack skills in d eveloping MCQ Overlapping of Activities Overlapping of Activities Teachers lacked of Skills in utilization in appropriat e technology Teachers lack of training Teachers lack of training Teachers lack of training on MCQ Making Teachers lack of training on MCQ Making Some teachers are alway s sent to seminars & con tests Too many reports require d to be submitted

22. Development of enhancement intensive remediation program to improved the MPS of each learner in which they can learn and study even after class hours. To enhance the teacher ICT literacy skills on utilizing ICT-based instructional materials for the least learned competency.

23. Download Unified TQs and TOs, Copy and Paste to ASPIRE E- Tool START Validating TOs & TQs NO YES Crafting Unified Answer Sheet and Reproduced TQs Distribution and Retrieval of Summative Test Automation Checking of Papers Encode Item Analysis to ASPIRE E- Tool END

26. During the pilot period, 4 out of 4 of teachers were able to automate the checking of papers and immediately submit Item Analysis, MPS and Least Learned Competencies.

30. DateDayActivityPerson Involved MondayPlanning for Plot TestingModel Team,Grade 10 Teachers, ICT coordinator, Department Head TuesdayDialogue with School Head for Approval of Pilot Testing Teachers, ICT Coordinator, Model Team principal WednesdayOrientation for Pilot TestingTeachers,ICT Coordinator, Model Team principal Thursday & FridayImplementation of Pilot TestingGrade 10 Students, MODEL TEAM FridayReport of Pilot TestingTeachers, ICT Coordinator, Model Team Principal, Coaches, Mentor

33. The C.I. Team is continuing to monit or the uploading of files from the imple menting teachers for the synchronizati on of cloud-based data management in t heir summative tests and the conduc t of automated review of test.